psy-lob-saw | Blog code snippets | Blog library

 by   nitsanw Java Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | psy-lob-saw Summary

kandi X-RAY | psy-lob-saw Summary

psy-lob-saw is a Java library typically used in Web Site, Blog, Nodejs applications. psy-lob-saw has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However psy-lob-saw build file is not available. You can download it from GitHub.

Blog code snippets

            kandi-support Support

              psy-lob-saw has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 25 star(s) with 5 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              psy-lob-saw has no issues reported. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of psy-lob-saw is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              psy-lob-saw has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              psy-lob-saw has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              psy-lob-saw code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              psy-lob-saw does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              psy-lob-saw releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              psy-lob-saw has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.
              psy-lob-saw saves you 1036 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 2351 lines of code, 198 functions and 26 files.
              It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed psy-lob-saw and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into psy-lob-saw implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Time encoder for a custom encoder
            • This method encodes the given array of bytes
            • Encodes the given string into the destination buffer
            • Encodes a string into the buffer
            • Main method for testing
            • Runs the ping
            • Utility method to create a counter
            • Sets the number of pages in the buffered page
            • Ping an integer
            • Prints the catchup
            • Performs a periodic ping
            • Time offset for long access
            • Writes a long to the buffer
            • Wait for a number of times
            • Returns a thread that waits for the last number of reps
            • Time charset encoder
            • Compute the number of bytes in the string buffer
            • Sets up the counter
            • Initializes the strings file
            • Wait for the number of elements to be volatile
            • This method blocks until the number of times elapsed
            • Calculates time pow of reps for reps
            • Initializes the server socket
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            psy-lob-saw Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for psy-lob-saw.

            psy-lob-saw Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for psy-lob-saw.

            Community Discussions


            how fragile is escape analysis in Hotspot in simple cases such as iterator in for-each loop
            Asked 2021-Jun-02 at 01:04

            Suppose I have a java.util.Collection that I want to loop over. Normally I'd do this:



            Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 17:26

            Your approach does not work. The correct approach is this:

            • Unless you are a performance expert (which is hard to become), do not make assumptions about what kind of code performs well vs. performs poorly, and maintain skepticism when analysing profiler reports. This is not particularly useful advice (it boils down to: A profiler report may be lying to you!), but it is what it is. Effectively, either be a performance expert, or accept that there's not much you can do about it. Sucks, but, don't shoot the messenger.
            • Write idiomatic java code. It is easiest to maintain and most likely to get optimized by hotspot.
            • Reduction of algorithmic complexity is useful and should always be the first thing you check. To some extent, an optimization that reduces algorithmic complexity gets to ignore the first rule. You do not need to be particularly up to date on the vagaries of JVMTI or Flight Recorder and how profilers work to conclude that an algorithmic rewrite is worthwhile and is going to significantly improve performance.
            • do not trust pithy rules of thumb, no matter how many people are saying it. Do not look for 'easy to apply patterns' like 'replace all foreach loops by appending an if-block that tests for empty first' - these are essentially never correct and usually reduce performance.
            • Be aware that bad performance advice is rampant. You should never treat ubiquitous presence of some argument otherwise bereft of proof or research as "that makes it more likely to be true" as a general principle in life and logical reasoning (it is, after all, a logical fallacy!), but this counts double for performance!
            More in-depth musing

            Presumably, you're not going to trust the above maxims just because I'm telling you to trust them. I'll try to take you through some falsifiable reasoning to show you why the above maxims are correct.

            In particular, this idea of checking for empty first seems extremely misguided.

            Let's first translate the overly hyperbolical and therefore rather useless well-known maxim premature optimization is the root of all evil into something more tangible:

            Do not make your code an ugly, caveat-ridden mess of weirdness because of an imagined performance issue.

            Why can't I go by often-heard maxims?

            Do not go by "people" here. Because "people" are notorious for being utterly wrong on performance, time and time again. If you can find widespread, pithy and entirely bereft of proof or research statements that X is good or bad for performance, you can rest assured in the thought that this means absolutely nothing whatsoever. Your average joe twitter writter or whatnot is a clueless idiot in this regard. Proof, ample research, or credentials are an absolute requirement to take things seriously, preferably 2 or 3 of those. There are lists of well known performance falsehoods (commonly held beliefs about how to improve JVM performance that absolutely do not help whatsoever and often actually hurt), and if you then search for these falsehoods you can find entire hordes of folks who espouse it, thus proving that you just cannot trust anything based solely on the fact that you "keep hearing it".

            Note also that for just about every imaginable line of java code, you can come up with 100+ plausible if somewhat exotic ideas on how to make the code less obvious but seemingly 'more performant'. Clearly then you can't apply all 100 variants to every line in the entire project, so the road you were planning on taking here ("I do not quite trust that profiler, I find it plausible escape analysis will fail to eliminate this iterator allocation, so, just to be safe I will add an if that checks for empty first"), ends in a disaster where even the simplest task becomes a many-lined, seemingly excessively redundant soup. And performance will be worse on average, so it's a lose-lose scenario.

            Here's a simple example to drive the point home, and you can watch those presentations by Doug for more of this sort of thing:



            Could one explain significant performance difference in char-by-char iteration over j.l.String?
            Asked 2020-Aug-13 at 09:48

            I've tried two ways to iterate char-by-char over java.lang.String and found them confusing. The benchmark summarizes it:



            Answered 2020-Aug-13 at 09:48

            As @apangin mentioned in his comment

            The problem is that BlackHole.consume is called inside the loop. Being a non-inlined black box method, it prevents from optimizing the code around the call, in particular, caching String fields.


            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install psy-lob-saw

            You can download it from GitHub.
            You can use psy-lob-saw like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the psy-lob-saw component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer For Gradle installation, please refer .


            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
          • HTTPS


          • CLI

            gh repo clone nitsanw/psy-lob-saw

          • sshUrl


          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Blog Libraries


            by hexojs


            by mastodon


            by tootsuite


            by halo-dev


            by vuejs

            Try Top Libraries by nitsanw


            by nitsanwJava


            by nitsanwJava


            by nitsanwJava


            by nitsanwJava


            by nitsanwJava