recheck | Replace traditional assertions with a single check | Functional Testing library
kandi X-RAY | recheck Summary
kandi X-RAY | recheck Summary
recheck is an fully functional open source testing tool that allows replacing manual asserts and checking everything at once.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of recheck
recheck Key Features
recheck Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on recheck
QUESTION
I have a table named "k3_order" with jsonb column "json_delivery".
Example content of that column is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 14:59Indexes can only be used by queries in the following cases:
the
WHERE
condition contains an expression of the forman index has been created on
is an operator in the index family of the operator class of the index
is an expression that stays constant for the duration of the index scan
the
ORDER BY
clause has the same or the exact opposite ordering as the index definition, and the index access method supports sorting (from v13 on, an index can also be used if it contains the starting columns of theORDER BY
clause)the PostgreSQL version is v12 and higher, and the
WHERE
condition contains an expression of the formbool_func(...)
, where the function returnsboolean
and has a planner support function.
Now json_delivery->'packageNumbers' ? '0000000596034Q'
satisfies the first condition, so an index scan can be used.
jsonb_exists(json_delivery->'packageNumbers', > '0000000596034Q')
could only use an index if there were a planner support function for jsonb_exists
, but there is none:
QUESTION
I need to select the first email in the list, but I don't know when it arrives.
Setting a large timeout for the email to arrive would probably work, but I am looking for a better solution.
I need to select the first row where the .subject
is confirm your email address
and the time field is a few seconds ago
.
This is what I've tried:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 09:39Perhaps reversing the order catches it?
QUESTION
I have a program which adds values to a database from textboxes.
I need to provide a way through which if the value added is not unique, it should return an error message. But my current code is unable to do that. Even if the value is not unique, it is saving the data in the database.
Below is my code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 21:13There are couple of approaches to fine tune it
Without touching database
- Update the query to select just 1 column instead of *. * selects all the columns which is not necessary to check if the record exists or not.
string query = "Select [Animal ID] from ExpData where 'Animal ID' = '" + textBox5.Text.Trim() + "' and Step = '" + comboBox2.Text.Trim() + "'";
- You can also use Exists method which returns a boolean
string query = "Select Exists(Select [Animal ID] from ExpData where 'Animal ID' = '" + textBox5.Text.Trim() + "' and Step = '" + comboBox2.Text.Trim() + "')";
If we change the script then you can use sqlcommand.ExecuteScalar function to just get the value of the column you have included/boolean in the select statement.
With changes to database
- Add a unique key constraint on the table ExpData. The unique key should have both columns Animal ID and Step.
- Now in the code you can just have a try catch block. IF there is no duplicate record then the insertion will be success. But if the record is duplicate then there will be an exception.
- save to database code in try block
- In catch block check the exception type along with ErroCode to see if the insertion failed because of the unique key. Check this thread, How can I catch UniqueKey Violation exceptions with EF6 and SQL Server?
My recommended approach
- Add unique key constraint on both the columns
- Create a stored procedure that
- takes the whole insert data as input
- checks if the record exists then return -1 = if no record exists then insert the new data and return the id of the new record.
- In the code you can just check the return value. If the value is a non negative value then the insertion is successful other wise show the message to the user.
If you can change the database then you can reduce one database call if there is not duplicate data.
P.S. You can also use object–relational mapping frameworks like entity framework etc to make it much more easier but it is a big change.
QUESTION
I use the Roboto font in my React project and I have a strange problem, when I access my application locally the font is not applied to my texts, however if I open the element inspector and I uncheck and recheck a css property (no matter which one) the font is applied everywhere!
I use scss files with node-sass and my font is local and defined using @font-face
Here is the .scss file for the font
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-30 at 22:59The solution is to not use "font-display: optional" ...
QUESTION
I am trying to insert multiple rows into my table using the below query : INSERT INTO TABLE2(ID) VALUES(1),(2) .It is showing SQL Command Not Ended.
Is it some syntacital error?I have rechecked but still not clear what's going wrong.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 19:41Invalid syntax, of course. But, here are 3 options that work.
QUESTION
I have a Postgres table T with 3 columns (w1, w2, occurrences)
, all three are integers and w1 and w2 are referencing to another table. So basically, there are two foreign keys and a value.
There are about 15 million unique values (indices) that w1 and w2 can become in each row. Currently, T holds around 1.8 billion rows, which are more or less permutations of the indices with the limitation, that - if you think of a symmetric matrix - only one value pair may exist. For example, there may be (252, 13, x)
but not (13, 252, x)
. However, there is no sorting, so (5, 900, x)
also may be in T (sorting is done during insert and depends on the value in the referenced table). These tuples (w1, w2) are unique.
At the moment, there are 3 different indices on that table, a UNIQUE INDEX tdc_idx_1 on T (w1, w2)
, a INDEX tdc_idx_w1 on T (w1)
and a INDEX tdc_idx_w2 on T (w2)
.
Basically, I want to run two different queries. The difficulty for me is to figure out where the bad performance comes from, or to accept the runtime given the "complexity" of the query and the table size (I'll guess that is not the case..). Short, I could need help in the structure of the queries and probably the handling of the table indices (or maybe the table design in general).
The most straightforward query for my desired result is
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 19:28QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-23 at 09:56Import ObjectID from mongodb package
QUESTION
As I understood by reading this blog post, Bitmap index scan may be superior to index scan, since it batches access to pages of the table itself to fetch data that is not present in the index.
Yet, it still needs to traverse index, so I see no reason why it may be better than Index-Only scan when all data requested present in index. Yet it looks like in many cases Postgres prefers bitmap index scan to index-only.
Taking example from another blog post:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-19 at 00:08Until the table has been vacuumed, it would be an index-only scan in name only. Each tuple would have to be verified in the heap. The planner knows that, and penalizes the index only scan accordingly. Once the table has been vacuumed and all the pages set to "all visible", then the planner starts preferring the index-only scan.
QUESTION
I have this sample code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-15 at 02:38Short answer: control flow narrowing is heuristic in nature and does not account for such correlations between variables. There is an open issue at microsoft/TypeScript#20497 requesting support for so-called "branch flags" like your allGood
. But it is probably too complex to implement.
Long version:
TypeScript uses control flow analysis to narrow the apparent types of variables and properties in blocks of code where it can follow that type guards or assignments have occurred. So, for example, in the following example code, the compiler can see that a truthiness check on a
will narrow it from number | undefined
to number
:
QUESTION
I am currently trying to migrate a system to postgres and I am unfortunately not able to understand why a specific query is running so incredibly slow. Both in Transact-SQL and Oracle the same query runs in under 200ms. First things first though, I have a big table with 14.000.000 entries currently which only gets bigger and bigger. Furthermore the table itself has 54 columns meaning that we have quite the sum of data.
The table has a rather straight forward structure like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-05 at 15:53Index lookups are expensive, so sql engine tends to use pk scan, instead of indexes, when retrieving many columns.
You can give a try with a composite index on entrytype+archivestatus (in this order) to extract relevant keys and then rejoin main table to get all columns.
Keep also the index on timestampcol
for ordering the results.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install recheck
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page