fluent-api | An IntelliJ plugin which allows to generate | Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | fluent-api Summary
kandi X-RAY | fluent-api Summary
An IntelliJ (>12.0) plugin which allows to generate interfaces
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Generate code for field methods
- Retrieves the class of the given PSI element
- Gets the fields
- Generate code
- Generate the set methods
- Sets whether or not the getter should be generated
- Sets the field
- Sets whether the setter should be generated
- Builds the getter name
- Get field
- Returns true if setter should generate setter
- Indicates whether getter should be generated
- Builds the code to set the fields
- Formats a field name
- Builds setter name
- Build the property code
fluent-api Key Features
fluent-api Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on fluent-api
QUESTION
Using EF core 6.0.1, I'm following the example shown here for configuring the join table for a many-to-many relationship in a migration, but I can't get past this error:
...The seed entity for entity type 'Classifier' cannot be added because no value was provided for the required property 'Id'.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-27 at 10:22I suspect the error message is a poor representation of the real error, since clearly the
Classifier.Idis provided. Why is this error being thrown?
Actually the error is correct. It's because here
QUESTION
I am trying to implement following case scenario: There is a custom table, let's say Task and I would like to create Many to Many relation with class Application user.
Currently I have following project arcitechture:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-07 at 17:57What should I do?
Option 2) is the best, imho.
IdentityUser belongs to a closed library that you don't want to reference in your client. It also contains a lot of fields that you don't need or want to expose in your API.
Your problem comes from an attempt to combine Model and DTO classes. That is not a best practice, although I admit it can be attractive in a (very) small app.
So keep your Models in the Server project and put tailor made DTO classes in Shared. Right now it is only essential for the User class but when your project grows you will be glad you did it for the rest too.
QUESTION
I have a Products table and a Categories table. I'm trying to make a many-to-many relationship between Product and Category. So I have a Table Called: ProductCategories - I followed the official doc:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-27 at 22:15Company is configured to cascade deletes to both Category and Product. That's "multiple cascade paths" and is not allowed. Put all your FK configuration together to see more easily which relationships can cascade. eg
QUESTION
I'm using EF Core v5 and the Npgsql EF Core provider v5 for Postgres v14.
I want CreatedAt and UpdatedAt computed columns to be set automatically. They are both of type DateTime.
I tried this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-08 at 11:20timestamp with time zone is a Postgresql type name rather than a value. The value of the current timestamp with time zone is current_timestamp or now(). Try
QUESTION
I am trying to seed data and none of my mappings seem to be working. I believe I am following the [textbook examples ][1] from documentation but I must be missing something.
My classes
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-13 at 17:06It turns out that I had simply forgotten to define what related data I wanted included with the entity I was reading from the database. In this example, to get the Results of the Student I just did this
QUESTION
I'm trying to get my head around protobuf-net at the moment, and found this article on being able to serialize sub-types: How to Serialize Inherited Class with ProtoBuf-Net
Effectively this suggests that the base type needs to know about the sub-type:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-03 at 19:06- Yes, there is a full API for this under RuntimeTypeModel, including callbacks for auto-discovery during runtime rather than ahead of time
However!
No, it can't work with unknown subtypes unless you mean: by ignoring the subtype aspect completely and just treating it as though it were the known type.
QUESTION
I have a MongoDB that looks something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-20 at 13:26Just in case anyone ever stumbles upon this question and wonders whatever happened, I figured it out and found a method that works like a charm.
It turned out that I had some of the 1-1 and 1-many relations confused in my initial models file.
QUESTION
When using Blazor WebAssembly, be default, three projects are created - Client, Server and Shared. Which project is the best choice for code which defines EF Core data model?
- If I put it in Server, I have to create it's client counterpart in the Client project, which creates redundant code
- If I put it in Shared and use Data Annotations, the client becomes transitively dependent on EF Core 🤢
- If I put it in Shared and use Fluent API, I'll have to check multiple files to understand even a single property (e.g. is this property required? what is it's max length?)
It seems like I'm picking the lesser of three evils, which seems to be the Fluent API. Are there any other aspects that I didn't consider?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 13:29Use attributes from the System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations namespace on the entities in the Shared project. These are useful in the UI and for client-side validation and will not introduce a dependency on EF.
Then use the fluent API in the Server project for any additional EF configuration.
QUESTION
What is the effective way to resolve ambiguity of many-to-many relationships that point to the same entity either through annotations or fluent configuration? Given models such as:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-16 at 22:47You have two Navigation properties on each entity, and EF doesn't have a convention to identify which goes with which. So you need to configure the model to explicitly relate the navigation properties. You'll also want to pick a descriptive name for the linking table. EG:
QUESTION
I'm using ASP.NET Core Identity along with Entity Framework Core on .NET 5, using a code first approach with a postgresql database.
I am trying to extend the identity classes like this
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-01 at 19:11IdentityUserLogin already has a UserId property which will turn into UserId columnn
IdentityUserLogin SourceCode
When you add the User property to UserLogin, EF will also add a UserId property (Like you pointed out in your question).
And that is then turned into a column usually called UserId
In order to prevent duplicate property names Ef has to make your UserId different by adding the suffix 1
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install fluent-api
You can use fluent-api like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the fluent-api component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
