RemoteCall | IntelliJ IDEA plugin for remote call some procedures | Plugin library

This could be due to the batch_size in the pipeline.config file. Try reducing it to 1 and see if it works.

Dictionary value cannot have two types,if you want to add them into 1 dictionary,you can only use Dictionary,and put string to string[] as DavidG said.Or you can only use two dictionaries.Here is a demo to use Dictionary.

Here is a demo:

Models:

Chaining the :not selectors should work: var buttons = document.querySelectorAll('button:not(.remoteCall):not(.refreshHistory)');

Here is a code after cleanup that works. Basically, the main problem is how the @distributed macro was trying to move the Python module around the cluster (it seems it does not know it is a library). So I packed it into a function which is always called locally at each given worker process (no risk of copying).

Because you aren't using await with Task.WhenAll(task1, task2); your program will have issues. If you need to run asynchronous code from within a synchronous context you still need to await the final result - which you can do with the thread pool and classic synchronization primitives (like ManualResetEvent) and a "non-blocking" poll loop for safety.

It looks like you want to run two methods concurrently - those methods may or may not be "true" async (i.e. IO-bound, not CPU-bound). In which case use the thread-pool via Task.Run but that "outer" task itself needs to be run in the pool so that the Task scheduler.

Rather than simply blocking on Task.Result, I prefer polling it in a loop with Task.Wait(Int32) (instead of Task.Wait()!) which alleviates some deadlocking problems - note that this shares .Result's problem of making very unproductive use of a program thread. An approach like this should not be used in high-performance, high-demand, or high-throughput applications, especially in ASP.NET WebForms where the (now antiquated and terrible) "one thread per request" model is still being used:

There are the following problems in your code:

• You are spawning a remote task for each value of i a and this is just expensive and in the end it takes long. Basically the rule of thumb is to use @distributed macro for your load balancing across workers this will just evenly share the work.
• Never put addprocs inside your work function because every time you run it, every time you add new processes - spawning a new Julia process also takes lots of time and this was included in your measurements. In practice this means you want to run addprocs at some part of the script that performs the initialization or perhaps the processes are added via starting the julia process with -p or --machine-file parameter
• Finally, always run @time always twice - in the first measurement @time is also measuring compilation times and the compilation in a distributed environment takes much longer than in a single process.

Your function should look more or less like this

This sounds like a classloader double load conflict.

But, before we check that, make sure the static method you want to invoke is in the exact class you're reflectively loading in; static methods don't really 'do' overriding/hierarchy.

Let's say you have 2 custom classloaders; both having the system's app classloader (the one that loads the classes that contain your main method) as parent, and both being URLClassLoader. We shall call them 'Ali' and 'Robin'.

When you ask Ali to load class "com.foo.MyClass", Ali will first ask its parent to load it. Only if parent cannot load it will Ali then attempt to find this resource itself (by looking through its URLs for file /com/foo/MyClass.class), and load it as a class. Let's say that happens (Ali finds it itself). This also means that the com.foo.MyClass loaded by Ali has as its classloader 'Ali'. That means any classes that are needed to be loaded by MyClass (for example, because one of its methods has a parameter of type org.web3j.protocol.Web3j, that means the Web3j class also needs to be loaded) - are loaded by Ali.

You then ask Robin to load the same class. Robin too will ask parent, and now the tricky thing happens: Parent doesn't know how to load it, so Robin will... also load it.

Now we have com.foo.MyClass loaded two times in the system. The weird thing is, these are completely different classes to the VM. This gets you bizarre errors; trying to assign an instance of Ali's MyClass to a variable of type Robin's MyClass will then produce the marvelous error message 'an instance of MyClass cannot be assigned to MyClass'.

So, in other words, you're loading a version of Contract.class with Ali, your class has loaded the Web3j class, and you get the instance of this with Web3j.class, but that's Robin's Web3j. This isn't the same as Ali's Web3j even though they have the same name.

Note that if both Ali and Robin end up being asked to load a class that they both fetch via parent, this problem does not occur (as it would then be Parent's class in both cases). This is why you can just pass, say, instances of java.lang.String around between classes loaded by different loaders without any issue.

One way out is to use getMethods and find the method you want to invoke here. Another, probably superior solution is to be careful and load ALL the classes with the same loader. So, don't write Web3j.class; write urlcl.loadClass("org.web3j.protocol.Web3j");. A third option is to ensure that the loader that loaded Contract.class is set up so that its parent will end up finding Web3j, and that your Web3j is loaded by that same parent (this should happen automatically is Web3j is simply on your classpath as you start the app; if the code that does the reflection has itself been loaded via a custom classloader, this gets trickier). Whether this is feasible depends on how your application has been set up.

First, x is scoped locally to f(), so even running f() on the local process produces an error:

I was using an incorrect path to access my data. My images were in "my-first-data/plant-pathology-2020-cropped-images/images"