reflecting | 开源博客系统。

There are few things that need to be fixed.

1. In your handleClick, you are using setSquares((squares) => squares.splice(i, 1, "X")). squares.splice will mutate the state variable squares which one should never do.
2. Also splice doesn't return updated array but

An array containing the deleted elements.

This causes squares from [null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null] to [null] causing you board to become blank for a moment. Then your setSquares((squares) => [...squares2]) kicks in from setTimeout making squares back to array making your square values visible again hence, the flash.

1. computersTurnHandler might return undefined in some cases where none of the return statements trigger hence

Uncaught TypeError: squares2 is undefined handleClick Board.js:34

1. You need to prevent user from clicking until your setTimeout is complete else multiple rapid clicks by user will cause inconsistent behaviour.

As for your query

is it acceptable at all to use Promises in that case

Usually situations like these can simply be solved by making use of temporary variable in most cases.

Now the Solution with promise and fixed handleClick and computersTurnHandler is as follows

The issue is that the app tries to go through the reflection classes without being fully loaded, so sqlalchemy gets an error due to not finding the currently running app and raises RuntimeError. I found that to fix that you need to provide app_context and therefore this fixed my issue.

I changed my app file to:

If the condition if(hit.collider.gameObject.tag == "Mirror") is not met, you are doing a lightPoints.Add(hit.point); and upadting the beam, adding points to the LineRenderer component position array also. That does not seem a good idea, as presumably you will get to the point when the ray does not hit anymore. As is, once you get to that point you keep on adding points, leading to the stack overflow.

I would add some safegard condition, where you stop adding points to your lists/arrays if you dont hit a gamobject of interest, maybe a determined ray length, or a condition that avoids the point to be added if the ray does not hit.

I checked the line of the error you are having in the script itself with not very revaling info. But you got the script there in case that helps.

You're mixing configuration options from Sentry SDK 3.x+ with Sentry 1.7.x. Sentry + Logback auto-configuration and properties like sentry.logging.minimum-event-level works only in the new SDK.

If you must use 1.7.x you have to configure Logback appender in logback.xml.

https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/java/legacy/logback/

For the first problem I ended up using the following extension, which does see properties with getters/setters unlike Mirror:

You can replace 0 to missing values, but better is removed original DataFrames by this repalced one with tested all rows if exist at least one non NaN value in boolean indexing:

Java does the same as the 'ordinal' comparision in c#.

The java documentation says 'It compares strings on the basis of Unicode value of each character in the strings.'

For non-surrogate unicode characters this is the same as string.CompareOrdinal in c#, which "Compares two String objects by evaluating the numeric values of the corresponding Char objects in each string."

I'm not sure if they're the same for high unicode codepoints (surrogate pairs) or not, but I suspect they might be, since both Java and c# uses 16 bits char types.

The 'standard' c# string.Compare, on the other hand, performs 'culture-sensitive' comparision. Which means that it 'uses the current culture to obtain culture-specific information such as casing rules and the alphabetic order of individual characters'. You can read more about this at the documentation for System.Globalization.CompareOptions.

There's no official API for doing this, but IIRC, tuples of homogeneous element types are guaranteed to have a contiguous memory layout. You take advantage of this by using UnsafeBufferPointer to read/write to the tuple.

Usually this requires you to manually hard-code the tuple's element count, but I wrote some helper functions that can do this for you. There's two variants, a mutable one, which lets you obtain an UnsafeBufferPointer, which you can read (e.g. to create an Array), and a mutable one, which gives you a UnsafeMutableBufferPointer, through which you can assign elements.

Thanks for such detailed description and all the necessary sample data.

As you already tried in your query you can have the item with quantity by joining items and item_containers table. For calculating free or reserved item you need to left join itemkit_containsers table since inventory for items in a kit is stored there. So just calculate the count for any item in itemkit_containers then you got your reserved quantity and by subtracting it from item_count of item_containsers table will give you free quantity for that item.

Schema and insert statements: