forall | Expressive static types and invariant checks for JavaScript
kandi X-RAY | forall Summary
kandi X-RAY | forall Summary
Expressive static type and invariant checks for JavaScript. It is similar to TypeScript, but:. Yes, it can check claims such as "this function can't produce negative balances" at compile time. Sounds magical, but it is actually simple: the catch is that it isn't doing classical (logical) type-checking, but, instead, it "type-checks" by inspecting with random samples. It can, thus, be wrong sometimes. The hypothesis, though, is that, in practice, if your code is wrong, it will almost always spot it; and being wrong sometimes is compensated by catching a much larger class of bugs. In short, Forall.js attempts to give you some of the expressivity of Idris, with the ease-of-use of TypeScript, trading absolute for probabilistic correctness. You can see it as the fusion of a type system with automated tests.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of forall
forall Key Features
forall Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on forall
QUESTION
I am fiddling with the basics of type-level programming in Haskell, and I was trying to write a function that "homogenizes" a heterogeneous list using a function with a context of kind (* -> *) -> Constraint
(e.g., length
or fmap (/= x)
).
The heterogeneous list is defined as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-11 at 22:45Even though e.g. AllKind2 Foldable [] '[Int]
does not match any equation for AllKind2
, it is not understood to be an unsatisifiable constraint. (The general principle is undefined type family applications are just that: undefined, in the sense it could be something but you have no idea what it is.) That's why, even if you know AllKind2 c t (x : xs),
you can not deduce x ~ t y
for some y
by saying "that's the only way to get a defined constraint from AllKind2
." You need an equation for the general AllKind2 c t (x : xs)
case that dispatches to a class that will contain the actual information.
QUESTION
Haskell hobbyist here - is it possible to map a polymorphic constant over a list of types in a generic way?
More precisely, consider this snippet:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-09 at 00:00I wish someone can prove me wrong, but this is one of the few corner cases where we meet a limitation of current GHC and we can not get away from using Proxy
, Tagged
or similar "relics" of the past.
Let's consider a simpler example:
QUESTION
This is valid syntax in GHC 9. What do the {..}
mean (as distinct from (..)
which GHC 8.10 requires here)?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-04 at 00:08See 6.4.14.1. Inferred vs. specified type variables:
Since the 9.0.1 release, GHC permits labelling the user-written type or kind variables as inferred, in contrast to the default of specified. By writing the type variable binder in braces as
{tyvar}
or{tyvar :: kind}
, the new variable will be classified as inferred, not specified.
..
is a specified type{..}
is an inferred type
forall a.
and forall {a}.
are invisible quantifiers that GHC will instantiate automatically by unification.
QUESTION
I learned that you can redefine ContT
from transformers such that the r
type parameter is made implicit (and may be specified explicitly using TypeApplications
), viz.:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-01 at 19:28Nobody uses this (invisible dependent quantification) for this purpose (where the dependency is not used) but it is the same as giving a Type -> ..
parameter, implicitly.
QUESTION
I'm trying to express an idea that given
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-25 at 19:53You get the exact same error with the slightly simpler definition of Foo c m
given here:
QUESTION
This only applies to Visual Studio 2022. I had uninstalled VS2019 and Preview where F# worked absolutely fine (F# 5.0). I am using VS2022 to use F# 6.0 and do not want to go back to F# 5.0.
The issue is specific to F#. I also use C# and I have no issues running the latest C# under VS2022.
There are near continual DevEnv processes running consuming anywhere from 1 to 4 of my CPU's 4 Hyperthreads. I have switched off all experimental options I can find in F# settings.
Sometimes there are 2 or more background processes running , sometimes paused and sometimes none - there appears to be no correlation between this and the background CPU consumption
Sometimes I have a pop up Dialog about waiting to complete an editor process or a compile process.
When devenev.exe is consuming CPU cycles under the properties I see there is always one clr.dllCoUnInitializeEE+0x6790
that is the culprit. I though this was meant to be a short-lived process? Sometimes there are two or three of these consuming most of a HyperThread (There are identical others but with very low or no CPU consumption). The stack on the guilty thread is as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-17 at 08:49Please report to Microsoft either using the people app in windows or the visual studio installer.
for now, there is only one option: use visual studio 2019. or try finding alternatives. there should be somewhere around the net
I suggest using Rider IDE instead(until the devs fix the bug):Download Rider IDE
I'm not really trying to advertise here, just suggesting an IDE Too compile and run you rprogram.
QUESTION
I figured out how to process a list of heterogeneous types constrained by a single class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-16 at 21:52With enough language features, it's possible to make a constraint that combines constraints:
QUESTION
I'm playing with Rank-N-type and trying to type x x
. But I find it counter intuitive that these two functions can be typed in the same way.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-08 at 16:22The key is that x :: a -> b
is a function that can provide a value of any type, no matter what argument is given. That means x
can be applied to itself, and the result can be applied to x
again, and so on and so on.
At least, that's what it promises the type checker it can do. The type checker isn't concerned about whether or not any such value exists, only that the types align. Neither f
nor g
can actually be called, because no such value of type a -> b
exists (ignoring bottom and unsafeCoerce
).
QUESTION
I followed Simon Marlow's book on parallel Haskell (Chapter 1) using rpar
/rseq
.
Below is the code (Solving the Squid Game bridge simulation):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-29 at 23:24You aren't actually using any parallelism. You write
QUESTION
I'd like to use Z3 to solve problems that are most naturally expressed in terms of atoms (symbols), sets, predicates, and first order logic. For example (in pseudocode):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-18 at 06:54"Alloy seems designed more for interactive use to explore consistency of models, rather than to find specific solutions for problems."
IMHO, Alloy shines when it comes to validate your own way of thinking. You model something and through the visualization of several instances you can sometime come to realize that what you modeled is not exactly what you'd have hoped for. In that sense, I agree with you.
Yet, Alloy can also be used to find specific solutions to problems. You can overload a model with constraints so that only one instance can be found (i.e. your solution). It works also quite well when your domain space remains relatively small.
Here's your model translated in Alloy :
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install forall
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page