SS-Collection | commonly used resources , only for personal collection

by Tsuk1ko JavaScript Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | SS-Collection Summary

SS-Collection is a JavaScript library. SS-Collection has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

A collection of commonly used resources, only for personal collection

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

SS-Collection has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 802 star(s) with 280 fork(s). There are 45 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

SS-Collection has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of SS-Collection is current.

Quality

SS-Collection has no bugs reported.

Security

SS-Collection has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

SS-Collection does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

SS-Collection releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of SS-Collection

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

SS-Collection Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for SS-Collection.

SS-Collection Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for SS-Collection.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on SS-Collection

is there any way in mongodb to create "user" that have "read" access only to specific views of the db?

EF6 Table Splitting and exception "A dependent property in a ReferentialConstraint is mapped to a store-generated column. Column: 'Id'."

QUESTION

is there any way in mongodb to create "user" that have "read" access only to specific views of the db?

Asked 2021-Jul-16 at 09:34

I am have created some of views that JSON i want to provide to frontend developers. i want front-end developer to access this views only. not the entire collection or database. this views contains cross-collection "$lookup" aggregations.

how could we create user with roles that have only access to "views" of the "db" only not even "collections"?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jul-16 at 09:34

Permissions in MongoDB are based on roles. Would be like this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68392214

QUESTION

EF6 Table Splitting and exception "A dependent property in a ReferentialConstraint is mapped to a store-generated column. Column: 'Id'."

Asked 2020-May-05 at 13:51

For some time I've been following the "First Class Collections" rule from Object Calisthenics in my domain design. In order to avoid creating a useless "Collection" table though, I use the table splitting configuration from Entity Framework.

But if for whatever reason I have a Parent class that doesn't have properties besides its Id and the child collection, I get the exception:

InvalidOperationException: A dependent property in a ReferentialConstraint is mapped to a store-generated column. Column: 'Id'.

The weird thing is that the database is created correctly, and I can query from it, but saving isn't possible.

If I simply add another property to the Parent, the problem disappears, which is even more strange.

I narrowed it down to a very simple test case:

Program.cs

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-05 at 13:51

The configuration order matters, parent configuration must come first.

Maintaining the logical order of configuration from Parent to Child is natural when configuring directly from the DbContext class, but when you separate the config using EntityTypeConfiguration, that might not be the case.

This seems to be a bug in Entity Framework for this specific scenario, since it works in most cases.

To make sure it always works, simply call the configuration for classes higher in the hierarchy first.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61565446

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install SS-Collection

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: