automerge | like data structure that can be

by automerge JavaScript Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | automerge Summary

null

A JSON-like data structure (a CRDT) that can be modified concurrently by different users, and merged again automatically.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of automerge

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

automerge Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for automerge.

automerge Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for automerge.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on automerge

Github Actions automerge not working as expected

Github actions pull request builder returns error

Git merge creating conflicts when it shouldn't

Github actions workflow doesn’t run on pull request when pull request is created by another workflow action and have conflict

How do I automerge dependabot updates (config version 2)?

Can't git push in parallel after merge using SHA1

what is GitStatus for and how to use it

How to git merge theirs *without* automerging?

How do I search for specific kinds of merge hyperlinks in clearcase?

How to perform a three-way diff in Git without merging?

QUESTION

Github Actions automerge not working as expected

Asked 2021-Apr-05 at 08:11

I have a yml file with 5 jobs as below

build - working
unit tests - working
regression tests - working
create pull request - working
merge pull request - not working

The first 3 jobs work on my development branch so my file begins with

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-05 at 08:11

Thanks to GuiFalourd for the tips which pointed me in the right direction on this. Following his advice led me to this solution which works well

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66935834

QUESTION

Github actions pull request builder returns error

Asked 2021-Apr-03 at 18:33

I have a github actions job which is failing on the last job. The build, unit test and regression test jobs are working fine but the pull-request job fails.

This is the code for the failing job, the token has been replaced.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-03 at 18:33

It seems that the problem is with the GITHUB_TOKEN you informed.

GitHub automatically creates a GITHUB_TOKEN secret to use in your workflow (you can find more information about it here).

Therefore in your case, you can follow the specifications informed on the action repository you're using:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66929605

QUESTION

Git merge creating conflicts when it shouldn't

Asked 2021-Jan-25 at 05:25

We have two branches: master and dev. Our ci deploys to production upon a merge into master.

Now, we do our development in dev and intend to merge to master when we wish to deploy. We do not do development in master.

When we open pull requests to master from dev we are greetings with 'conflicts'. These conflicts are a list of the changes we made in dev. Resolving these conflicts means going through them manually and selecting the changes from dev in each case.

Why is the merge considering these conflicts? No changes were made to these files in master between merge events. Why isn't automerge just applying all the changes we made in dev to master instead of flagging them?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-24 at 21:19

You shouldn't use squash merges to merge two long-lived branches. Always use a merge commit.

The Git FAQ explains why using squash merges in this case is a problem:

When Git does a normal merge between two branches, it considers exactly three points: the two branches and a third commit, called the merge base, which is usually the common ancestor of the commits. The result of the merge is the sum of the changes between the merge base and each head. When you merge two branches with a regular merge commit, this results in a new commit which will end up as a merge base when they’re merged again, because there is now a new common ancestor. Git doesn’t have to consider changes that occurred before the merge base, so you don’t have to re-resolve any conflicts you resolved before.

When you perform a squash merge, a merge commit isn’t created; instead, the changes from one side are applied as a regular commit to the other side. This means that the merge base for these branches won’t have changed, and so when Git goes to perform its next merge, it considers all of the changes that it considered the last time plus the new changes. That means any conflicts may need to be re-resolved.

There is no way to do this with squash merges that avoids this problem.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65875789

QUESTION

Github actions workflow doesn’t run on pull request when pull request is created by another workflow action and have conflict

Asked 2020-Dec-10 at 14:22

I have 2 workflow file. One is test.xml and other is merge.xml

The test.xml run php unit test and if the test successful it will create a pull request to staging branch (the test.xml run in feature branch).

The strange is, if the pull request have conflict, the merge.xml workflow will not triggered. But when the pull request don't have any conflict, it will run and merge the pull request. Did my xmls are misconfiguration?

Here is the xmls.

Test.xml

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Dec-10 at 14:22

Unfortunately, the action that should be triggered by pull_request is not going to run if the pull request has merge conflicts. It's a limitation of GitHub Actions as described here: https://github.community/t/run-actions-on-pull-requests-with-merge-conflicts/17104/2

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65047992

QUESTION

How do I automerge dependabot updates (config version 2)?

Asked 2020-Oct-24 at 16:14

Following "Dependabot is moving natively into GitHub!", I had to update my dependabot config files to use version 2 format.

My .dependabot/config.yaml did look like:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Oct-20 at 03:03

Auto-merge was disabled on the Dependabot into GitHub:

Auto-merge will not be supported in GitHub-native Dependabot for the foreseeable future. We know some of you have built great workflows that rely on auto-merge, but right now, we’re concerned about auto-merge being used to quickly propagate a malicious package across the ecosystem. We recommend always verifying your dependencies before merging them.

There are some hacks to accomplish this job, you can check GitHub dependabot-core issue #1973 for some ideas.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64116781

QUESTION

Can't git push in parallel after merge using SHA1

Asked 2020-Sep-04 at 18:48

I'm trying to git push in parallel after merging branches

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-04 at 18:26

If you wish to use a hash ID on the left (source) side of a push refspec, it's wise to use a full name on the right side:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63741846

QUESTION

what is GitStatus for and how to use it

Asked 2019-Nov-11 at 07:06

I want to write a tool for automerging changes from master into feature branches. I use two tools here, a branchtool which creates new feature branches, the users are able to enable or disable automerge for their feature branches and a automergetool which, runs as a service on the server and needs to read this information and run the merge process.

During my research i discovered GitRef.Statuses and "GitStatus"-Class, which "contains the metadata of a service/extension posting a status" (official microsoft description). GitStatus looks very interesting, because i can define own Statuses and set a state on it. The Problem is, i didn't found anything about it - except MS-Pages, which are not very far-reaching. i don't know whether my procedure is correct or not. So how can i use it? My intention is this one:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Nov-11 at 07:06

Thanks for the detailed expression in comment.

In fact, you can refer to the relevant Rest api doc to get know more about the GitStatus Class. This GitStatus only available under commit.

Yes, we can give a body to GitStatus like

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58746348

QUESTION

How to git merge theirs *without* automerging?

Asked 2019-Oct-24 at 16:00

I have a master and develop branch that I always want to accept what's in develop as the source of truth, overwriting any changes in master.

How can I do this? I though this would do it

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Oct-24 at 16:00

Beware of the fact that git merge develop -Xtheirs (similar to your git merge develop --strategy-option theirs) is NOT a way to "accept what's in develop as the source of truth, overwriting any changes in master"

It will take "theirs" (in your case, master) version for every conflicting chunk, but any other (non-conflicting) change will be treated in the usual way, taking everything from both parents when able to.

To merge while taking everything from one parent, making the result exactly similar in terms of code as one parent, you have another option, which is to use -s ours on the side you want to keep (since unfortunately the "theirs" counterpart doesn't exist).

It could go like this

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58543893

QUESTION

How do I search for specific kinds of merge hyperlinks in clearcase?

Asked 2019-Sep-12 at 20:21

Background

I have recently created an erroneous merge hyperlink in clear case. This was the result of a script that automerged several files. Given that a script created the erroneous merge, I am trying to search for other instances of erroneous merge arrows. Below are the constraints I want to put in my search:

All merge hyperlinks created by me.
On a specific date

This question talks about finding a merge hyperlink in one file. However, I am looking for a set of merge hyperlinks that I created.

What I know

I know that you can describe hyperlinks as shown below:

Describe a hyperlink.
...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Sep-12 at 20:21

Consider cleartool find to try and link those hlink

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57911088

QUESTION

How to perform a three-way diff in Git without merging?

Asked 2019-Jul-06 at 19:49

I want to perform a three-way diff between two git branches with a common merge base, and view it with kdiff3.

I've found lots of guidance on SO (and a few very similar questions (1, 2, 3) ) but I haven't found a direct answer. Notably, a comment on this answer implies that what I want is possible, but it didn't work for me. Hopefully that user might chime in here :)

For background, when I perform merges I use a "diff3" conflict style:

git config --global merge.conflictstyle diff3

And I have git mergetool configured to use kdiff3.

When resolving merge conflicts this shows me four files:

The current branch's file ($LOCAL)
The other branch's file ($REMOTE)
The file which is the common ancestor of the two branches ($BASE)
The merged output file ($MERGED)

However, git difftool only will pull up the two branch tips. I want to see the base file, too. To be clear, I want to be able to perform this diff before merging, including on files without merge conflicts. (git mergetool only shows the three-way diffs if there are conflicts).

Partial Solution #1:

With an individual file, I can export the three versions and manually call the diff:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jan-23 at 09:53

As far as I remember this is not possible. You can diff mergebase against local_branch and mergebase against remote_branch like described in the answer you referenced. But I think there is no facility yet to get a 3-way merge like you requested with a standard git command. You might request on the Git mailing list that this feature gets added.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41803083

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network