kandi X-RAY | wowsuch Summary
kandi X-RAY | wowsuch Summary
Dogecoin Price Calculator
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
wowsuch Key Features
wowsuch Examples and Code Snippets
Trending Discussions on Apps
I tried upgrading Android Gradle Plugin from 4.2.2 to 7.0.1 using the upgrade assistant which is available in Android Studio at Tools > AGP Upgrade Assistant. The only change it made was to my project-level build.gradle file:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Aug-24 at 16:35
the Android Gradle Plugin documentation still says classpath 'com.android.tools.build:gradle:4.2.0' instead of 7.0.1.
Is this a bug in Android Gradle Plugin 7.0.1?
Quite possibly. Or, perhaps beyond, as the
Instantiatable Lint check has a history of problems.
If your scenario does not match one of those three August 2021 bugs, and you are in position to provide a reproducible test case, file a fresh issue! Beyond that, if a clean-and-rebuild is not clearing up your problem, you might need to simply disable the
Instantiatable Lint check for the time being by adding the following to all of your build.gradle files at the application or library level (i.e. all except your project-level build.gradle):
We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). I.e.,
Error 400: invalid_request
You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure.
You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules.
The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google.
If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies.
How do I get through this error? It is important to note that:
- The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal". Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant
- I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain
- Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different
- This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the
urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oobredirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser).
- I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain. I have three client ids. The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022.
Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the
$stderr.puts url line. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here (version as of this writing).
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-02 at 07:56
steps.oauth.v2.invalid_request 400 This error name is used for multiple different kinds of errors, typically for missing or incorrect parameters sent in the request. If is set to false, use fault variables (described below) to retrieve details about the error, such as the fault name and cause.
- GenerateAccessToken GenerateAuthorizationCode
Today i have got this email:
Last July, we announced Advertising policy changes to help bolster security and privacy. We added new restrictions on identifiers used by apps that target children. When users choose to delete their advertising ID in order to opt out of personalization advertising, developers will receive a string of zeros instead of the identifier if they attempt to access the identifier. This behavior will extend to phones, tablets, and Android TV starting April 1, 2022. We also announced that you need to declare an AD_ID permission when you update your app targeting API level to 31 (Android 12). Today, we are sharing that we will give developers more time to ease the transition. We will require this permission declaration when your apps are able to target Android 13 instead of starting with Android 12.
Action Items If you use an advertising ID, you must declare the AD_ID Permission when your app targets Android 13 or above. Apps that don’t declare the permission will get a string of zeros. Note: You’ll be able to target Android 13 later this year. If your app uses an SDK that has declared the Ad ID permission, it will acquire the permission declaration through manifest merge. If your app’s target audience includes children, you must not transmit Android Advertising ID (AAID) from children or users of unknown age.
My app is not using the Advertising ID. Should i declare the
AD_ID Permission in Manifest or not?
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-14 at 20:51
Google describe here how to solve
Add in manifest
In earlier versions, we had Startup.cs class and we get configuration object as follows in the Startup file....
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Oct-26 at 12:26
I'm trying to access appsettings.json in my Asp.net core v6 application Program.cs file, but in this version of .Net the Startup class and Program class are merged together and the using and another statements are simplified and removed from Program.cs. In this situation, How to access IConfiguration or how to use dependency injection for example ?
Edited : Here is my default Program.cs that Asp.net 6 created for me...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Sep-30 at 11:13
Assuming an appsettings.json
After upgrading to android 12, the application is not compiling. It shows
"Manifest merger failed with multiple errors, see logs"
Error showing in Merged manifest:
Merging Errors: Error: android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for
android:exportedwhen the corresponding component has an intent filter defined. See https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element#exported for details. main manifest (this file)
I have set all the activity with
android:exported="false". But it is still showing this issue.
My manifest file:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Aug-04 at 09:18
I'm not sure what you're using to code, but in order to set it in Android Studio, open the manifest of your project and under the "activity" section, put android:exported="true"(or false if that is what you prefer). I have attached an example.
With the upgrade to Google Cloud SDK 360.0.0-0 i started seeing the following error when running the
dev_appserver.py command for my Python 2.7 App Engine project.
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Feb-08 at 08:52
This issue seems to have been resolved with Google Cloud SDK version 371
On my debian based system i fixed it by downgrading the
app-engine-python component to the previous version
With regard to the Log4j JNDI remote code execution vulnerability that has been identified CVE-2021-44228 - (also see references) - I wondered if Log4j-v1.2 is also impacted, but the closest I got from source code review is the JMS-Appender.
The question is, while the posts on the Internet indicate that Log4j 1.2 is also vulnerable, I am not able to find the relevant source code for it.
Am I missing something that others have identified?
Log4j 1.2 appears to have a vulnerability in the socket-server class, but my understanding is that it needs to be enabled in the first place for it to be applicable and hence is not a passive threat unlike the JNDI-lookup vulnerability which the one identified appears to be.
Is my understanding - that Log4j v1.2 - is not vulnerable to the jndi-remote-code execution bug correct?References
Update #1 - A fork of the (now-retired) apache-log4j-1.2.x with patch fixes for few vulnerabilities identified in the older library is now available (from the original log4j author). The site is https://reload4j.qos.ch/. As of 21-Jan-2022 version 188.8.131.52 has been released. Vulnerabilities addressed to date include those pertaining to JMSAppender, SocketServer and Chainsaw vulnerabilities. Note that I am simply relaying this information. Have not verified the fixes from my end. Please refer the link for additional details....
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Jan-01 at 18:43
The JNDI feature was added into Log4j 2.0-beta9.
Log4j 1.x thus does not have the vulnerable code.
I just upgraded an environment with nrwl from angular version 11 to 12 with two angular applications and several libraries. After update when I try to compile using optimization settings:
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Jan-31 at 19:50
Reason of the issue
It is expected browserslist to return an entry for each version ("safari 15.2", "safari 15.3") instead of a range ("safari 15.2-15.3"). So, this is just a bug in the parsing logic of Safari browser versions which needs to be corrected and will be done soon in fixed versions of Angular 12/Angular 13. Link to details is here.
This is fixed in v12.2.16 and v13.2.1, please update if you are experiencing this issue. Users on v11 shouldn't be affected. Link to details is here. If you can not/do not want to update for any reason, then one of the workarounds below can be used.
Add to .browserslistrc such lines:
In vuejs2 app having select input with rather big options list it breaks design of my page on extra small devices. Searching in net I found “size” property, but that not what I I need : I want to have dropdown selection, which is the default. Are there some other decision, maybe with CSS to set max-height of dropdown selection area.
Modeified PART # 1: I made testing demo page at http://photographers.my-demo-apps.tk/sel_test it has 2 select inputs with custom design and events as in this example link How to Set Height for the Drop Down of Select box and following workaround at js fiddle:...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Jan-15 at 16:00
Unfortunately, you cannot chant the height of a dropdown list (while using
It is confirmed here.
you can build it yourself using divs & v-for (assuming you get the list from an outsource) and then you can style it as you wish.
apologies for barring bad news.
No vulnerabilities reported
Reuse Trending Solutions
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page