td.js | Because I 'm crazy enough to actually do

You can achieve by this following steps

1. First on row click you need to get selected row like this

   var selectedRow = $("#jsGrid").find('table tr.highlight').

2. Then you can use

   selectedRow.toggleClass('highlight') or selectedRow.removeClass('highlight')

DEMO

Solution for: - CometD 4.0.2 - Spring 4.3.9.RELEASE - Spring Security 4.1.0.RELEASE

In my project we faced similar problem while switching from "long pooling" to "websocket" connection. For clarification - one difference - we were using "user context" only during "handshake".

With usage of "long pooling" Cookie with JSESSIONID was interpreted correctly by Spring and we were working in "user context". After switching to "websocket" it looked like "user context" was lost just before running message receiving code.

We could not find proper solution - following code is in my opinion just a hack. But it worked for us.

You can do most of that with SpaCY and some regexes.

So, you have to take a look at the SpaCY API documentation.

Basic steps in any NLP pipeline are the following:

1. Language detection (self explanatory, if you're working with some dataset, you know what the language is and you can adapt your pipeline to that). When you know a language you have to download a correct models from SpaCY. The instructions are here. Let's use English for this example. In your command line just type python -m spacy download en and then import it to the preprocessing script like this:

Q1: I mock up the Button as below since unit test requires us to isolate the target and mock up any other dependencies. Is that correct?

Currently, the recommended approach for React unit testing is shallow rendering. It basically renders the given component one level deep. If we shallow render your Test component, it will call render method of Test component, but not the render method of Button component. Even though Button is 3rd party component and dependency, we don't need to mock it. Because we don't render it. But still, we will be able to see whether it's in the component tree and it has got the correct props. This is what essentially we will assert with the mocking approach also. However, shallow rendering has few limitations also, but usually, it works very well for most of the scenarios.

But you can obviously mock children and render the whole component also. But it's time-consuming and problematic, at least with my experience.

Q2: I have got the following warning even if the test passes. How can I resolve that?

Since you pass a string as name for React.createElement, React think you want to create a normal HTML element, and not a React component. But since there is a no HTML element call Button (case sensitive) and it doesn't know prop called htmlType, you get this unknown prop type warning. To prevent this warning, either you can stop passing props to React.createElement or pass a mock component to React.createElement instead of the name string.

I think what @MukeshSharma is trying to say is: Since your function is asynchronous, you have to provide a callback-function when calling the flavorOfTheDay()-function. Just like you did in the first code snippet: flavorOfTheDay('07-12-2018', doStuff) --> the doStuff is your callback function.

Modified example from above as anonymous callback function:

You have to pass this.props.navigation from parent to component and then, you can use it.

In your case, i think you should pass this.props.navigation from Home.js to Rowstd like this:

It doesn't look like you have tried

I don't think you are using the official CometD code, because the official CometD does not have the concept of a provider.

Please have a read at the official documentation to get started with CometD.