miq | Super lightweight jQuery-like DOM library | Plugin library

You need to modify gitlab.rb because nginx has baked in DNS reverse proxy and it routes internally based on this parameter. The --hostname is just for docker, nginx cannot read from it.

Could you please try following.

The biggest problem I see here is that you use CMD instead RUN in your dockerfile. CMD is to define a command that will be run when container is ran. With the Dockerfile you have now, only the last one is executed when you start your container and all of those mkdirs, moves, etc. are never executed. As said, you need to use RUN keywords to indicate command that build process should execute and commit as image layer. You probably also do not need the catalina.sh CMD as it might come from the image you base on, but you need to check it on doc page for the base image or take a peek to it's Dockerfile or use docker history imagename To see the layers and commands used to create them.

I took a deeper look into this and the base image you use. In addition to the CMD's your problem is that you change the workdir by running cd commands. catalina.sh exists in $CATALINA_HOME dir, which then is marked as workdir in base image. When you change the active directory by executing cd it breaks the image runtime.

I'd suggest you try with following dockerfile:

Try below XPath to select required button node:

It seems that worker, which takes care of refreshing, is not starting at all due to the insufficient resources on Manage IQ server. If your swap is more than 60% full (seen from the log) then the services already used all of your RAM.

You can get Basic ManageIQ server requirements for each type of server (Vagrant, Docker, Public cloud) here: http://manageiq.org/docs/get-started

Just pass in the fieldnames you want to the DictWriter and include the argument extrasaction='ignore', which will only write out the columns you want, e.g.:

I would implement your container to gracefully capture signals. Namely first to capture SIGTERM to start a graceful shutdown, so the container has time to even exit itself before it receives a kill signal with SIGKILL.

You can then call a graceful stop with

You'll probably need to contact either the authors of the original paper and/or the owner of the Github repo for a final answer, but most likely the differences here come from the fact that you are comparing 3 different algorithms (despite the name).

Minimum redundancy Maximum relevance algorithms are actually a family of feature selection algorithms whose common objective is to select features that are mutually far away from each other while still having "high" correlation to the classification variable.

You can measure that objective using Mutual Information measures, but the specific method to follow(i.e. what to do with the scores computed? In what order? What other post-processing methods will be used? ...) is going to be different from one author to another - even in the paper they are actually giving you two different implementations, MIQ and MID.

So my suggestion would be to just choose the implementation you are more comfortable with (or even better, the one that produces better results in your pipeline after conducting a proper validation), and just report which specific source did you choose and why.

In case if you are unsure what workers to work with, you might be able to do the following:

1. run evm server normally: bundle exec rake evm:start and see what worker types were running: bundle exec rake evm:status

2. kill evm server: bundle exec rake evm:stop

3. start a single worker in the foreground:

ruby lib/workers/bin/run_single_worker.rb MiqWorkerClassHere