inlocation | WordPress Oficial Plugin | Content Management System library

Good day

I have created a custom Location field for warehouse locations:

I am running a sensor and location service, the data is passed to the TraceManager file which where it is dealt with and passed to the TraceCWrapper to be mapped to a shared C library .so , It seems the sensor and location data is fine and received in TraceManager, it then is passed into TraceCWrapper, however the app crashes after a few seconds, and the only error line i get is:

A/libc: Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault addr 0x8 in tid 29938 (AsyncTask #1), pid 29870 (pp.traceandroid)

I have a custom table in SQL Server called AnimalBreed and maintenance page. I wish to add User Defined Field support via the KvExt approach instead of traditional practices involving either CSAnswers or a CacheExtension of the DAC and underlying "Usr" fields.

Is this possible?

Can it be done for line-level (child) DACs, such as existing INLocation and INLocationKvExt?

Thanks!

UPDATE:

It appears the feature needs at least:

1. ensure your table has the NoteID column as uniqueidentifier datatype and the DAC has the corresponding field: Guid? NoteID and [PXNote()] attribute.

2. In the ASPX, if not ListView, add the following to the PXDataSource tag: EnableAttributes="true"

By making these changes, I can Manage User Defined Fields, choose Attributes to include, and I can store values to the KvExt table.

I am using Version = 19.205.0023

Sales Order page observation: if I add two UDFs on SO Order Entry page, one is combobox and one is checkbox, setting their values saves just fine, but then updating the combobox and save leads to loss of the checkbox (from true to false), unless you uncheck and recheck prior to the save. Is this a bug?

I need to validate the selection of a proper location during PO Receipt, which may mean altering the "Default" location defined on the Item Warehouse screen on an ad hoc basis. My challenge is that the field defaulting event handler is defined within the POLocationAvailAttribute Attribute rather than the POReceiptEntry graph.

I am trying to understand how much I can use generics in protocols. The idea I have in mind is the following:

We have an EDI vendor that uses our extended webservice endpoints. These are currently all still 6.1 Contract 2.

We attempted to provide upgraded 18.200.001 Contract 3 endpoints, but they are running into an error "View Results has BQL delegate" when trying to pull data from the endpoint. (The endpoint gathers a large amount of inventory data via GI.)

The vendor tells us that if these are extended rather than default they should continue to work even after the old default versions are deprecated.

They also say: With 2018 Acumatica updated their optimization making almost impossible to pull entire record sets as these queries do. There may be a way to turn off the BQL delegate but you would need to consult Acumatica for that.

Is this true? Are we better off leaving them as is, or is there a way of making them work for the new contract?

Below is the (upgraded) GI the webservice endpoint uses.

I am trying to an alarm app that retrieve time value from database(Firestore), which I store as String, but it throws NullPointerException in my onTimeSet method, I don't know what else to do.

This is my method (dbAlarmManager).

The function returns -1, even though Uniform is defined and used within the vertex shader, I suspect the cause may be that the out attributes might not be properly bound with the target buffer (not sure if that is the case). Without this one Uniform, most of my values will stay the same.

Drawing the Transform Feedback

I want to change Timestamp into Y-m-d H:i:s format

Here Am trying to achieve by doing following way :