MapPT | include compass , legend , scale | Map library
kandi X-RAY | MapPT Summary
kandi X-RAY | MapPT Summary
Map print template. include compass,legend,scale and so on
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of MapPT
MapPT Key Features
MapPT Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on MapPT
QUESTION
In an application using EclipseLink 2.5 and container-managed transactions that needs to merge detached entities from time to time, each entity contains a field with the @Version
annotation. Some implementation of optimistic locking is necessary, since enitities are mappted to DTOs and sent to the client, which might then request an update on these entities based on the changes they have made to the corresponding DTOs. The problem I am facing is that whenever persist()
or merge()
are called on an entity, the corresponding entity being added to the persistence context in the case of persist()
or the updated entity returned by merge()
do not contain the updated version field. To demonstrate this through an example, suppose we have the following entity:
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-17 at 15:10Merge and persist don't need to immediately go to the database, so operations that depend on, triggers, sequencing and versions might need to call flush or commit to have those values set. Flush forces the context to synchronize with the database, and should set the values appropriately in managed objects. ID generation can be set on persist calls - this can happen when sequences allow for pre-allocation, but not usually when identity objects or triggers are used.
Since an EntityManager context represents a transaction, it is completely isolated from other contexts/transactions. Until the transaction commits, version and other changes cannot be picked up by other processes anyway, so it shouldn't matter when synchronization occurs to other processes. JPA states that most exceptions occur either on the persist/merge call or can be delayed until the context synchronizes with the database (flush/commit) depending on the nature of the operation. Optimistic locking is meant for systems where these collisions are infrequent and retries are less expensive than pessimistic locking every operation
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install MapPT
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page