etcd-node | Alternative etcd client for node.js | Key Value Database library
kandi X-RAY | etcd-node Summary
kandi X-RAY | etcd-node Summary
Alternative etcd client for node.js
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of etcd-node
etcd-node Key Features
etcd-node Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on etcd-node
QUESTION
So I know how to add a worker node to an existing Kubernetes 1.14 cluster (that was set up with kubeadm
): kubeadm token create --print-join-command
will print a valid kubeadm join
command with correct values for arguments --token
and --discovery-token-ca-cert-hash
.
I currently understand that for adding another node to the control plane (master node) kubeadm join
requires the additional arguments --experimental-control-plane
(w/o value) and --certificate-key
. This is for stacked control plane and etcd nodes.
How (in which file) can I obtain the correct value for --certificate-key
for an existing cluster?
UPDATE My first (and currently only) master node was created without the argument --experimental-upload-certs
to kubeadm init
(but by kubeadm init --pod-network-cidr=10.244.0.0/16
instead). Therefore manual certificate distribution should apply and a possible sequence of steps could thus be:
- copy certificates and keys in
/etc/kubernetes/pki/{ca.*,sa.*,front-proxy-sa.*,etcd/ca.*}
from the first to the new master node - run
kubeadm token create --print-join-command
on the first master node - run printed
kubeadm join
command with the additional argument--experimental-control-plane
on the new master node
Is this the correct procedure?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-25 at 13:55According to the documentation, this command provides a new decription key:
QUESTION
I try to setup a haproxy'd multi-master node setup for Kubernetes, as described in [1]. My network configurations are:
- haproxy = 192.168.1.213
- master0|1|2 = 192.168.1.210|211|212
- worker0|1|2 = 192.168.1.220|221|222 (not interesting at this point)
all hosts are able to connect to each other (DNS is resolved for each node). Each node is running Ubuntu 18.04.3 (LTS). Docker is installed as
- docker.io/bionic-updates,bionic-security,now 18.09.7-0ubuntu1~18.04.4 amd64 [installed]
Kubernetes packages currently installed are
- kubeadm/kubernetes-xenial,now 1.16.3-00 amd64 [installed]
- kubectl/kubernetes-xenial,now 1.16.3-00 amd64 [installed]
- kubelet/kubernetes-xenial,now 1.16.3-00 amd64 [installed,automatic]
- kubernetes-cni/kubernetes-xenial,now 0.7.5-00 amd64 [installed,automatic]
using an additional repository as described in [2] (i'm aware that i've installed bionic
on my VMs, but the "newest" repo available is still xenial
).
My haproxy is installed as haproxy/bionic,now 2.0.9-1ppa1~bionic amd64 [installed]
from [3] repository.
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-27 at 13:06While not being able to find a decent solution and created an issue in the original "kubeadm" project at github, see here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/1930 .
Since the "triage" suggested in the issue was not feasable (Ubuntu is pretty much "set") for me, I ended in setting up another Docker distribution, as described here: https://docs.docker.com/install/linux/docker-ce/ubuntu/ , purging installed distribution before starting the new setup.
While running Docker (Community) v19.03.5
through kubeadm v1.16.3
throws the following warning:
QUESTION
My objective is to run the following command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-28 at 10:27You need to apply following RBAC permission as a cluster-admin
to provide permission to user aviral@socialcops.com
for creating clusterRole and clusterRoleBinding:
ClusterRole.yaml
QUESTION
I was following instructions at https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/independent/high-availability/#stacked-control-plane-and-etcd-nodes and I can't get the secondary master node to join the primary master.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-13 at 06:39Upgrading to k8s version 1.13.0 resolved my issue. I think the instructions were specifically for this newer version.
QUESTION
I have been working on a simple Node.js application that SETs and GETs a key from etcd using Istio to connect the two services together. I have tried a few variations but keep seeing the same error returned.
nodeAppTesting failed(etcd-operator) ->{"errors":[{"server":"http://etcd-operator:2379","httperror":null,"httpstatus":503,"httpbody":"upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers","response":{"statusCode":503,"body":"upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers","headers":{"content-length":"57","content-type":"text/plain","date":"Thu, 08 Jun 2017 17:17:04 GMT","server":"envoy","x-envoy-upstream-service-time":"5"},"request":{"uri":{"protocol":"http:","slashes":true,"auth":null,"host":"etcd-operator:2379","port":"2379","hostname":"etcd-operator","hash":null,"search":null,"query":null,"pathname":"/v2/keys/testKey","path":"/v2/keys/testKey","href":"http://etcd-operator:2379/v2/keys/testKey"},"method":"GET","headers":{"accept":"application/json"}}},"timestamp":"2017-06-08T17:17:04.544Z"}],"retries":0}
Looking at the proxy logs, I can see that client and server proxies are involved in the communication (and this is verified I think in seeing envoy in the server header).
Attaching the Node.js app and the deployment.yaml. server.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-09 at 18:21This is probably a better question for https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/istio-users or https://github.com/istio/issues/issues
but it looks like your application isn't up - can you check
kubectl get pods
and see nothing is still pending ?
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install etcd-node
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page