js2 | This project has moved over to Mochiscript

You should be able to use it like this:

Inside js1.js the function execute a promise that is asynchronous and you want it to wait for the Promise's result :

document.getElementById("app3").innerHTML = await myPromise;

At this point, the function will stop and wait for the "myPromise" to complete (resolve or reject). More on : https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/await

The function inside js2.js do not executes code that block it's execution, myDisplay2 can be executed in a synchrone way, the result of the promise will be executed later (if the promise resolve) in the :

.then(function (resp) { document.getElementById("app1").innerHTML = resp; });

To make it short, as soon as you are using "await" the function is "async".

calling evaluateJavascript will make onPageFinished to be called further, in which you are setting, again, your Handler

simplest way to avoid this is introducing some boolean which will be flagged after evaluating JS and prevent second and further calls

I managed to get the first of those redirects working

Although there's nothing in the .htaccess file you posted that appears to do this?

As you can see, I tried with normal Redirect, but what happens is URL http://example.com/category_one/sub_page_one/ redirects to https://example.com/category-one/sub_page_one/

Again, the directives you posted in the question won't perform such a redirect?! There's nothing that specifically redirects HTTP to HTTPS? So, if you are seeing such a redirect you are either seeing a cached response or WordPress itself is performing this redirect. (Although the category-two redirect(s) would produce such a result since they are in the wrong order - see below).

(Aside: In your example URLs you appear to be converting underscores (_) to hyphens (-) in the URL-path, however, you don't state this as a requirement and the resulting URL in your last (edited) example still contains underscores. So, I assume this is not a specific requirement and that source and target URLs can simply be different.)

You should avoid mixing mod_alias Redirect directives and mod_rewrite RewriteRule directives. The simpler Redirect directive is prefix matching and always executes after mod-rewrite, despite the apparent order in the config file.

The order of these directives can also be important. They may need to be in order of specificity (depending on the directive and/or regex used). If there is any ambiguity then the most specific rule needs to be first.

This question was asked because of porting issue from scala 0.6.33 to scala 1.1.1 and The solution for this is answered on this: -

scala-js "@JSGlobalScope" error when migrating to scala-js 1.1.1

As the release notes of Scala.js 1.0.0 explain, trying to even read a member of an @JSGlobalScope object that does not actually exist in the global scope will throw a ReferenceError, whereas Scala.js 0.6.x would give undefined.

The same section of the release notes explains that, if the purpose is to check whether it is defined, it is now necessary to use an explicit test with js.typeOf. In your specific example:

What you can do if you only want the content of the data field then you can extract it to a PSObject and merge them and convert it back to JSON if that is the format you want.

You just need to add template inside the table tags just like what you did with the delete icon, You need to make sure that it has it's v-slot named just like the header you want to place the text field under it.

You can try to add detail itself to a computed item as a link to an original item and use it to delete from the original details array: