review | Visual regression testing tool for responsive websites
kandi X-RAY | review Summary
kandi X-RAY | review Summary
Updating large and possibly responsively designed sites can be a hassle. You never know whether your change breakes anything on the other end of your sitemap, or in a certain resolution, except if have a look at every individual page...in every resolution you care about. The idea of review is not to test everything (and visual testing is hard) but rather use the human mind's excellent ability to quickly scan information and filter out what you need, i.e. what is broken. This screenshot is from review-host, which hosts multiple reviews in one server.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- index the sites
review Key Features
review Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 20License : Permissive (MIT License)
Copyprotected AdmissionReviewData createRejectedAdmissionReview(ObjectNode body, int code, String message) {
AdmissionReviewData data;
String requestId = body.path("request")
.required("uid")
.asText();
Admiss public void add(Review review) {
reviews.add(review);
computeRating();
} public void setReview(String review) {
this.review = review;
} type RouteEncoder ctx s route = ctx -> Prism' s route
pimap :: Prism' b a -> Prism' c d -> (y -> x)
-> RouteEncoder x a c -> RouteEncoder y b d
pimap p q f r ctx = p . r (f ctx) . q
Option Explicit
Public donationDict As Scripting.Dictionary
Sub ouvrir()
Dim data As Range, id, ws As Worksheet
Dim rw As Range, arr(), numArrCols As Long
Set ws = ThisWorkbook.Worksheets("thirdSheet")
Set data = ws.Option Explicit
Sub LockPivots()
Dim ws As Worksheet
For Each ws In ThisWorkbook.Worksheets
Select Case ws.Name
Case "2) Review Charts-Management", "3) Review Charts-Functional"
ws.UnProtect ::: mermaid
graph TD
%%{init: {"flowchart": { "useMaxWidth": false } }}%%
A[Author sends a review to the customer success email] -->|Dynamics 365 creates a review case based on the Knowledge Base Article Review Template| B[[Automation]]
const Review = () => {
const [showModal, setShowModal] = useState("close");
const [review, setReview] = useState([]);
const handleClose = () => setShowModal("close");
const handleShowModalOne = () => setShowModal("modal-o["Communication Type","Delivery Due Date","Customer Id","Process_Status"]
with mytable as(
select 4455628986 asset_id , "[{'oldValues': [], 'newValues': ['COMPO_MAIL'], 'fieldName': 'Communication Type', 'fieldTypCommunity Discussions
Trending Discussions on review
QUESTION
In his paper Generics for the Masses Hinze reviews encoding of data type.
Starting from Nat
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-14 at 18:05The difference is the category. Nat is an initial algebra in the category of types. Rep is an initial algebra in the category of indexed types. The category of indexed types has as objects type constructors of kind * -> *, and as morphisms from f ~> g, functions of type forall t. f t -> g t.
Then Rep is the initial algebra for the functor RepF defined as follows:
QUESTION
Issue found: Invalid Data safety section We reviewed your app's Data safety section in Play Console and found discrepancies between it and how the app collects and shares user data. All apps are required to complete an accurate Data safety section that discloses their data collection and sharing practices - this is a requirement even if your app does not collect any user data.
We detected user data transmitted off device that you have not disclosed in your app's Data safety section as user data collected.
Issue details
We found an issue in the following area(s):
...SPLIT_BUNDLE 2: Policy Declaration for Play Safety Label: Device Or Other IDs Data Type - Device Or Other IDs (some common examples may include Advertising ID, Android ID, IMEI, BSSID)**
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-03 at 13:15Open
Google Play ConsoleApp content
Data safety => Manage
Overview click next
Answer the questions (then next):
Does your app collect or share any of the required user data types? = yes
Is all of the user data collected by your app encrypted in transit? = yes
Do you provide a way for users to request that their data is deleted? = yes
go to
Device or other IDsand check it thennextcheck Device or other IDs and manage it
answer the questions
Is this data collected, shared, or both? = Collected
Is this data processed ephemerally? = yes
Is this data required for your app, or can users choose whether it's collected? = Users can choose whether this data is collected
Why is this user data collected? = check
App functionality
then save
click next and save and app will review and approved by play store team
QUESTION
We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). I.e.,
Error 400: invalid_request
You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure.
You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules.
Request details:
The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google.
If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies.
redirect_uri: urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob
How do I get through this error? It is important to note that:
- The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal". Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant
- I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain
- Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different
- This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the
urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oobredirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser). - I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain. I have three client ids. The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022.
Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url line. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here (version as of this writing).
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 07:56steps.oauth.v2.invalid_request 400 This error name is used for multiple different kinds of errors, typically for missing or incorrect parameters sent in the request. If is set to false, use fault variables (described below) to retrieve details about the error, such as the fault name and cause.
- GenerateAccessToken GenerateAuthorizationCode
- GenerateAccessTokenImplicitGrant
- RefreshAccessToken
QUESTION
I have a legacy .NET application that I have ported to .NET 6.0 and am executing cross platform (Windows & Linux).
Much of the legacy code was developed with hard coded path creation, using backslash in strings, like
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 12:17As there's not a built in way to protect against this at development or execution time, I'm going to add this code to run after my integration tests. It will sweep the filesystem and throw an exception if it finds any files or directories created with an inappropriate character (backslash).
I wanted to add a check for colon as well, in case folks were creating paths like "c:\feux\barre.txt", but it looks like at least NuGet creates directories with colon (ex. ~/.local/share/NuGet/v3-cache/670c1461c29885f9aa22c281d8b7da90845b38e4$ps:_api.nuget.org_v3_index.json)
QUESTION
I've added a new .Net 6.0 project to my solution in VS2022. Installed the EntityFramework 6.4.4. with install-package entityframework and now try to add a ADO.Net Entity Framework Model to the project. I get an error:
The project's target framework does not contain Entity Framework runtime assemblies. Please review the target framework information on the project's property page.
I've tried adding several other EF packages (which should not be necessary according to the documentation here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/ef6/fundamentals/install). I thought the problem was with my installation but I created a .Net 6.0 console application containing the problem and sent it to a colleague and he got the same message.
Also found this topic here: Adding Entity Framework Model on Visual Studio 2022 but there's no answer there.
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a .Net 6.0 Console application.
- Install the EF6 package using
install-package entityframeworkfrom the package manager console window. - Right-click solution and choose 'Add' => 'Add item'.
- In the left pane click 'Data'.
- Choose 'ADO.Net Entity Framework Model.
- Click 'Add'.
The error appears:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 16:33The EF 6 tooling onl works on a .NET Framework project, you must add one to your slution and then copy or link to the generated code. In addition, EDMX files in .NET Core projects are not supported, but there are workarounds
QUESTION
It was working fine before I have done nothing, no packages update, no gradle update no nothing just created new build and this error occurs. but for some team members the error occur after gradle sync.
The issue is that build is generating successfully without any error but when opens the app it suddenly gets crash (in both debug and release mode)
Error
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-25 at 23:22We have fixed the issue by replacing
QUESTION
Apple reviewer has just rejected my app since ATT request doesn't appear: "We are unable to locate the App Tracking Transparency permission request when reviewed on iOS 15.0.1."
My code is as shown below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-02 at 21:43An Apple person suggests that you request it through applicationDidBecomeActive(_:) in AppDelegate. That's how I fixed the issue for iOS.
QUESTION
With regard to the Log4j JNDI remote code execution vulnerability that has been identified CVE-2021-44228 - (also see references) - I wondered if Log4j-v1.2 is also impacted, but the closest I got from source code review is the JMS-Appender.
The question is, while the posts on the Internet indicate that Log4j 1.2 is also vulnerable, I am not able to find the relevant source code for it.
Am I missing something that others have identified?
Log4j 1.2 appears to have a vulnerability in the socket-server class, but my understanding is that it needs to be enabled in the first place for it to be applicable and hence is not a passive threat unlike the JNDI-lookup vulnerability which the one identified appears to be.
Is my understanding - that Log4j v1.2 - is not vulnerable to the jndi-remote-code execution bug correct?
ReferencesThis blog post from Cloudflare also indicates the same point as from AKX....that it was introduced from Log4j 2!
Update #1 - A fork of the (now-retired) apache-log4j-1.2.x with patch fixes for few vulnerabilities identified in the older library is now available (from the original log4j author). The site is https://reload4j.qos.ch/. As of 21-Jan-2022 version 1.2.18.2 has been released. Vulnerabilities addressed to date include those pertaining to JMSAppender, SocketServer and Chainsaw vulnerabilities. Note that I am simply relaying this information. Have not verified the fixes from my end. Please refer the link for additional details.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-01 at 18:43The JNDI feature was added into Log4j 2.0-beta9.
Log4j 1.x thus does not have the vulnerable code.
QUESTION
Trying to follow the google tutorial for in-app reviews and I'm currently stuck with the following piece of code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 08:45I think the documentation has a typo.
The correct exception cast should be this RuntimeExecutionException
I've opened a documentation issue about this
UPDATE: 11/01/2022 (dd/MM/yyyy)
Upgrading your play:core dependency to at least version 1.10.1 will bring you a new custom ReviewException which should replace the RuntimeExecutionException (or at least this is what we think).
Without an official answer the current safest solution is probably the one below:
QUESTION
For some, simple thread related code, i.e:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-17 at 14:58An answer from a core developer:
Unintended consequence of Mark Shannon's change that refactors fast opcode dispatching: https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/4958f5d69dd2bf86866c43491caf72f774ddec97 -- the INPLACE_ADD opcode no longer uses the "slow" dispatch path that checks for interrupts and such.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install review
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
