react-go

it is possible to have multiple stacks in google charts.
but it is only available using google's material bar chart,
it is not possible using the classic bar / column chart.

classic = google.visualization.ColumnChart & package = 'corechart'
material = google.charts.Bar & package = 'bar'

the issue with material charts, there are several options that are not supported,
which can be found here...
Tracking Issue for Material Chart Feature Parity #2143

for starters, the data table needs to be structured as follows...
for two stacks, side-by-side, you will need 5 columns in the data table.
first, the x-axis, the remaining four for the two stacks.

if you're using the Google OAuth 2.0 flow, I'm not sure why you're using the API key, since you're sending the user Access Token used to identify the user who completed the OAuth flow with your Client ID.

Also, I recommend using the global service auth, so you don't need to send auth credentials to each service call.

Your useEffect is executing before has loaded the API. I would do something like:

After investigating a bit on my end, I think I might have a solution that works for you.

I've messed with OAuth before, and it's quite tricky sometimes because it has to be robust. So a bunch of security policies usually get in the way.

I'll provide my full step-by-step, since I was able to get it working, trying my best to match what you posted.

Firstly, to have a clean slate, I went off the example code linked in the tutorials. I cloned and built the project, and did the following:

• Creating a new project on GCP
  • Configured the OAuth consent screen
    • I set the User type to "internal". This options may not be available if you're not using an account under GSuite (which I am). "External" should be fine though, just that "internal" is the easiest to test.
  • Created a OAuth 2.0 Client
    • Added http://localhost:3000 to the "Authorized JavaScript origins" and "Authorized redirect URIs" sections
• Register a Django superuser
  • Registered a Site, with value of localhost:8000 for both fields.
  • Went into the admin panel, and added a Social Application with Client ID and Secret Key as the "Client ID" and "Client Secret" from GCP, respectively. I also picked the localhost site that we added earlier and added it to the right hand box. (I left Key blank)

Example of my Application Page

• Filled in the clientId field in App.js, in the params of the GoogleLogin component.

Here's where I ran into a bit of trouble, but this is good news as I was able to reproduce your error! Looking at the request in the network inspector, I see that for me, no body was passed, which is clearly the direct cause of the error. But looking at App#responseGoogle(response), it clearly should pass a token of some sort, because we see the line googleLogin(response.accessToken).

So what is happening is that accounts.google.com is NOT returning a proper response, so something is happening on their end, and we get an invalid response, but we fail silently because javascript is javascript.

After examining the response that Google gave back, I found this related SO post that allowed me to fix the issue, and interestingly, the solution to it was quite simple: Clear your cache. I'll be honest, I'm not exactly sure why this works, but I suspect it has something to do with the fact that development is on your local machine (localhost/127.0.0.1 difference, perhaps?).

You can also try to access your site via incognito mode, or another browser, which also worked for me.

I have knox token set up, can I use it instead of the JWT tokens?

I don't think I have enough knowledge to properly answer this, but my preliminary research suggests no. AFAIK, you should just store the token that Google gives you, as the token itself is what you'll use to authenticate. It seems that Knox replaces Django's TokenAuthentication, which means that Knox is in charge of generating the token. If you're offloading the login work to Google, I don't see how you could leverage something like Knox. However, I could be very wrong.

Does the class GoogleLogin(SocialLoginView), take care of the steps of validating the access token and code with google and creating the user with that email in database?

I believe so. After successfully authenticating with Google (and it calls the backend endpoint correctly), it seems to create a "Social Account" model. An example of what it created for me is below. It retrieved all this information (like my name) from Google.

Example of my "Social Accounts" page

As for how to retrieve the login from the browser's local storage, I have no idea. I see no evidence of a cookie, so it must be storing it somewhere else, or you might have to set that up yourself (with React Providers, Services, or even Redux.

You need to render this component SignIn inside the routing context because you are using Link from react react-router-dom

You are doing something like:

The issue here is the order of the routes in the Switch in App.

First, you can reduce to get the Good and Bad counts to a single JSON and then use Object.entries to get the required format as in an array.

Try like this

Solution I finally got it working! I was changing directory to build, but shouldn't have been. So here are my working cloudbuild.yaml and app.yaml files:

cloudbuild.yaml

I could see pretty-checkbox's developer last published 4 years ago.

Let's say the new module used popper-js@2.0 and someone who already had popper-js@4.0 as direct or sub-dependency in their project is more likely to face unmet peer dependency on using the new module.

Downgrading the version is not recommended due to possible conflict with other modules. A workaround would be to add resolutions.

Before doing anything, ensure there is no other version of react installed globally, delete your node-modules folder and package-lock.json file. Ensure your package.json dependency has react@15.4.0 and only add popperjs@^1.16.0 if you're sure that other modules in your project are not relying on later versions of popperjs.

Take a look at this article for a good explanation on peer dependencies

If there are other modules that needs other versions of popperjs then in your package.json you could add an additional property at the end like below,