reliable | Testing management suite | Continous Integration library
kandi X-RAY | reliable Summary
kandi X-RAY | reliable Summary
中文版 | Offcial Site. Testing management suite with continuous delivery support.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Content header header
- Generate sidebar configuration
- The replacement function .
reliable Key Features
reliable Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on reliable
QUESTION
In part of my application I have an option that displays a list of albums by the current artist that aren't in the music library. To get this I call a music API to get the list of all albums by that artist and then I remove the albums that are in the current library.
To cope with the different casing of names and the possibility of missing (or extra punctuation) in the title I have written an IEqualityComparer
to use in the .Except
call:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 23:05If you're going to use the CompareOptions
enum, I feel like you might as well use it with the CompareInfo
class that it's documented as being designed for:
Defines the string comparison options to use with CompareInfo.
Then you can just use the GetHashCode(string, CompareOptions)
method from that class (and even the Compare(string, string, CompareOptions)
method if you like).
QUESTION
I am trying to install all needed modules for an existing Django project. When I run pip install -r requirements.txt
I get the following errors:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-26 at 13:05Inside your requirements.txt change scipy line with this scipy==1.6.0 and save. Now retry pip installation.
QUESTION
Is there away to run scheduled background job on stateful service in azure service fabric ? the only way I found only was timers & reminders which they run on Actors not stateful service. I'm trying to run scheduled background job to clean up some data in Reliable dictionary.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 08:15The recommended way to run background jobs in Service Fabric is to simply override the RunAsync
operation. This works equally fine for stateful and stateless services - although, as already mentioned, Actors
provide some additional functionality with its built in support for reminders and timers.
Below is a very basic example
QUESTION
Searching a good way to split an XML path into an array. I have the feeling my solution is not as reliable as i want.
What I have:
What I want to get is an array like: [product, containeditem, productidentifier]
My Code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 12:28As @andrewjames said, the solution depends on how the path looks like. If it is like your example, you can get the solution with basics string methods of JavaScript
CodeQUESTION
cppreference states the following on thread_local
variables
The storage for the object is allocated when the thread begins and deallocated when the thread ends. Each thread has its own instance of the object. Only objects declared thread_local have this storage duration.
I think of using a thread_local static
member variable declared inside a shared library that is loaded at runtime via dlopen
/ LoadLibrary
. Since it's totally possible that there are already quite a few threads running at the timepoint this library is loaded and some of them will then access that variable later, I wonder how this works if the storage is allocated when the thread begins? If the variable does not exist in the program at the timepoint the thread is created this obviously cannot work as explained there. Furthermore it seems like a waste of resources if a process running e.g. 100 threads would create an instance of that thread local variable for each of those threads if only a few of them would actually access the variable.
So, is the documentation incorrect here or are there chances that what I'm trying here might lead to undefined behavior? If the documentation is simply incorrect, where can I find a reliable description of what can be expected in reality? In case it's implementation defined, I'm particularly interested how clang handles it on macOS and Windows.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 23:06What cppreference says is paraphrased. What's actually in the standard is
All variables declared with the
thread_local
keyword have thread storage duration. The storage for these entities lasts for the duration of the thread in which they are created. There is a distinct object or reference per thread, and use of the declared name refers to the entity associated with the current thread.
There's nothing in there about when, exactly, the storage is allocated, just that it lasts for the duration of the thread. This means it could be allocated when the thread is created, or when the variable is first used, or possibly a combination of both.
The variable may not be constructed (I assume this is what you mean when you say "create an instance") when the storage is allocated. That depends on where and how the variable is defined. But, if it is constructed, it won't be destroyed until the thread ends.
Support for dynamically loading libraries via dlopen
or LoadLibrary
is a compiler/platform extension, and not part of the language. How that interacts with thread_local
would also be platform specific.
QUESTION
I am implementing a Kubernetes based solution where I am autoscaling a deployment based on a dynamic metric. I am running this deployment with autoscaling capabilities against a workload for 15 minutes. During this time, pods of this deployment are created and deleted dynamically as a result of the deployment autoscaling decisions.
I am interested in saving (for later inspection) of the logs of each of the dynamically created (and potentially deleted) pods occuring in the course of the autoscaling experiment.
If the deployment has a label like app=myapp , can I run the below command to store all the logs of my deployment?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 17:40Yes, by default GKE sends logs for all pods to Stackdriver and you can view/query them there.
QUESTION
I have a set of images of numbers that go from 0 to 20 with intermediate classes(0,25 / 0,5 / 0,75). Each number will be defined as a class of its own. I have 22 images per class.
These images will be used for training and testing on a convolutional neural network for classification. I'm not worried about accuracy, it's only a proof of concept so I realise that the dataset is too small for any real reliable outcome. Like I said, it's only meant as a proof of concept.
EDIT: As suggested by @Kaveh, I checked out ImageDataGenerator.flow_from_directory
As far as I could tell, this is used to increase your dataset size using data augmentation. However, what I'm asking is, now that I have these images set in different folders (22 images per folder, each folder making a class) how do I use them. I've always been loading one file that makes up the dataset (example: mnist; through keras). I've never used my own data and therefore, have no idea what the next step is.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 04:13organize your directories as shown below
QUESTION
I have a list of emails and UTM sources that I need to perform a lookup on to return the source, but I need the formula to default to certain values if they are present. See example table below
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 07:53If I am understanding well, you want to return the Source by a custom order where Direct has priority over all others and the problem is that VLOOKUP, INDEX(MATCH, and XLOOKUP all deliver the first (or last) match alphabetically with no respect to your custom priority, so they won't give you the results you want.
I see two approaches that are illustrated below. To make this more clear, I took your table and converted it into an Excel Table (CRTL t) that I named tContacts and I added a third email address and a source of "social" to it to illustrate the advantage of method 2.
Quick Answer
You can jump straight to NOTES below and implement Method 1 with a Named Range to test if this really works. The rest is just an explanation of how it works and the choices you have if I have misunderstood or you want to modify it further.
METHOD 1 XISs - Keep it simple, no helpers
Here, you will put in a lookup value (I put mine in D9) that I named lookupVal for clarity of understanding. I used LET to make this more clear and speed up calc, but it is not required - you can collapse everything into the final XLOOKUP below if you prefer.
QUESTION
I essentially have a state with type array that will have a desired max limit in it, lets say a limit of 5 elements in the array.
Adding to the state with elements can come slowly, or just at quick succession.
The issue, that I'm aware of doing something like this won't work:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 18:41You could move your condition into the update callback and if it is too long just return the previous state:
QUESTION
I have a bunch of instances, each having a unique tempfile for its use (save data from memory to disk and retrieve them later).
I want to be sure that at the end of the day, all these files are removed. However, I want to leave a room for a fine-grained control of their deletion. That is, some files may be removed earlier, if needed (e.g. they are too big and not important any more).
What is the best / recommended way to achieve this?
May thoughts on that
The
try-finalize
blocks orwith
statements are not an option, as we have many files, whose lifetime may overlap each other. Also, it hardly admits the option of finer control.From what I have read,
__del__
is also not a feasible option, as it is not even guaranteed that it will eventually run (although, it is not entirely clear to me, what are the "risky" cases). Also (if it is still the case), the libraries may not be available when__del__
runs.tempfile
library seems promising. However, the file is gone after just closing it, which is definitely a bummer, as I want them to be closed (when they perform no operation) to limit the number of open files.The library promises that the file "will be destroyed as soon as it is closed (including an implicit close when the object is garbage collected)."
How do they achieve the implicit close? E.g. in C# I would use a (reliable) finalizer, which
__del__
is not.
atexit
library seems to be the best candidate, which can work as a reliable finalizer instead of__del__
to implement safe disposable pattern. The only problem, compared to object finalizers, is that it runs truly at-exit, which is rather inconvenient (what if the object eligible to be garbage-collected earlier?).- Here, the question still stands. How the library achieves that the methods always run? (Except in a really unexpected cases with which is hard to do anything)
In ideal case, it seems that a combination of __del__
and atexit
library may perform best. That is, the clean-up is both at __del__
and the method registered in atexit
, while repeated clean-up would be forbidden. If __del__
was called, the registered will be removed.
The only (yet crucial) problem is that __del__
won't run if a method is registered at atexit
, because a reference to the object exists forever.
Thus, any suggestion, advice, useful link and so on is welcomed.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 09:06I suggest considering weakref built-in module for this task, more specifically weakref.finalize simple example:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install reliable
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page