changesets | Changeset library with operational transformation

It seems like this was a localized bug. Making the source repo publishing seems to be enough.

Preface

Question is offtopic here: as already mentioned in comment, it's question for Software Recommendations site

Face

1. Every versioned object with history in SVN can be referenced using PEG-revision for its history state
2. Folder in SVN-repo is object of versioning
3. In order to compare two folders, you have to have folder-diff tool (for your OS) and know (command-line) options for calling it

According to Slant's comparison:

• Meld can be used on Linux for folder-diffing
• Best folder-diff tool is Beyond Compare

From points 1-3 above it follows that Meld can be used for your task in form

meld folder@REV1 folder@REV2

You can manually check the presence of an artifact before doing aws s3 sync and gracefully exit the step if condition is not satisfied:

This was an issue in MongoDB/Realm. I reached out to the support and they resolved it by pushing an update on the 9th of September 2021.

When Cherry picking you can add the -x option to have git add a message to the commit-message of each cherry-picked commit:

-x When recording the commit, append a line that says "(cherry picked from commit …​)" to the original commit message in order to indicate which commit this change was cherry-picked from. This is done only for cherry picks without conflicts. Do not use this option if you are cherry-picking from your private branch because the information is useless to the recipient. If on the other hand you are cherry-picking between two publicly visible branches (e.g. backporting a fix to a maintenance branch for an older release from a development branch), adding this information can be useful.

This is the closest you'll get. A cherry picked commit it recorded as a new commit on the target branch, not as a reverse or forward integration.

Git doesn't do "partial merges" since git stores the status of the worktree as a "version". TFVC stores the workspace versions of individual files instead.

What you're seeing are 2 very different things.

In TFVC you see a branch graph that is clearly defined through branch objects that have a defined parent branch. Each integration between those branches is visualized, since the merge stores which files were merged, which changesets were part of that merge and over which branch relationship these were merged. A changeset in TFVC (closest thing to a commit in git) is also a very different thing. For one, a changeset can span multiple branches, even repositories, and a changeset contains 1 or more changes to files.

In Git a branch is just a special pointer to a commit somewhere in the commit graph. Parentage is calculated (based on the commit graph) and branches can freely merge without respecting a preconfigured hierarchy. The visualization shows the relationships between commits, not branches. A special type of commit, the merge, stores when a new commit was created from the basis of 2 or more other commits. The relation to these commits is stored, not the names of the branches that happened to point to these commits. A Commit stores the changes to the worktree. One or more branches may point to that commit.

Since a cherry-pick replays the changes on one branch in the commit tree onto another, it's not recorded as a merge where multiple sets of commits are linked together. Instead, it's recorded as a new commit that happens to have the same diff (and potentially not even that if you needed to do conflict resolution).

By adding the -x flag the relationship is stored in the comments.

After inserting a record by giving id with liquibase, altering table with the ALTER TABLE identity_demo MODIFY id NUMBER(19,0) GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY (START WITH LIMIT VALUE) command as mentioned on this question updates the sequence generator. So that inserting new records to the table with entity manager can be done without constraint error.

The problem was solved by changing

to . Though if anyone could explain why this would be different between running the compiled jar (java -jar app.jar) and mvn:spring-boot run that would be interesting to me. I understand that the filepaths change when compiled however, even looking in the target folder it should still be the same relevant path right (in this case db is the root folder following the normal liquibase layout). So still slightly confused as to why ./ should not work in this case.

Regardless, if anyone faces this problem again do not use relative paths even when within the resources folder!

There is "JSON changes" which shows the changes and it has details, but its far from perfect. You can read up more here how to interpret the "JSON changes".

I'm not aware of any build in AWS tool to make changset more readable. Maybe there are some third party tools. One thing that people do is to keep CloudFormation templates under git's control. With git you can very easily check and compare different versions of your template.

You need the correct image for your build agent. In this situation, the agent basically only needs terraform installed and accessible: