leapfrog | read your friends better with your internet neighborhood
kandi X-RAY | leapfrog Summary
kandi X-RAY | leapfrog Summary
Leapfrog helps you read your internet neighborhood. It shows you what your friends are talking about on several community web sites. Leapfrog isn't done, but you can check out what's here. You can also see it in action on the web at leapf.org.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- format a string
- Formatter helper
- Revive the value
- Escapes string .
- Creates a delayed listener for the given event handler .
- Format an event string
- Creates a buffered handler for a received listener
- Create handler for handler
- create event handler
- wraps the template function in a context
leapfrog Key Features
leapfrog Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on leapfrog
QUESTION
I wrote an OpenCL code to solve advection eqution using two different schemes: Upstream bias and Leapfrog scheme.
The code runs fine, but I would like to know if I could use OpenCL local memory to optimize the code. From my understanding, local memory is useful when we have something that could be shared within the local workgroup. But in my OpenCL kernel, other than the indexes, I do not have (or I could not think of, per se..) anything that should/could be shared.
Kernel for upstream bias scheme
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-12 at 22:39Shared/local memory optimization sometimes is very useful (~10x gain in matrix multiplication), and sometimes it is not. In your case, it might be somewhat useful, but not much - you have to try. I have tested a similar application in lattice Boltzmann, but without any performance gains (could use it for 8/171 byte of memory transfer there, so I expected only insignificant gains in the first place).
Out of the 3 advection directions, you can only use shared memory for 1, in your case the x-direction. In the upstream3d kernel that is 4/20 byte of memory transfer, so expect at best 20% better performance.
A workgroup is a strip of grid cells along the x-direction. Each grid cell loads in_p_tn for itself and from 3 of its neighbors at one index lower. Neighbirs y-1
and z-1
are not located in the workgroup, so you can't use local memory for those. But the x-1
neighbors are, at least all but the left most one. So the strategy would be:
- Load
in_p_tn
for each cell in the workgroup fromglobal
memory toprivate
memory and then write it to alocal
memory array with thelocal_id
. The leftmost thread must load its left neighborx-1
additionally since that is outside of the workgroup strip*. The local memory array must have the dimensionsworkgroup size +1
. - Make a
barrier(CLK_LOCAL_MEM_FENCE);
. After the barrier, thelocal
array has been filled up. - Take
in_p_tn
for the current cell fromprivate
memory. For thex-1
neighbor, load it fromlocal
memory. Do the advection, write the result toglobal
memory. Done!
*This can potentially eliminate any performance gain if you make the workgroup too small.
Another remark: In the upstream3d
kernel, you currently load in_p_tn[idx]
from global
to private
memory 4 times. Make a private
variable and load it once, then use the private
variable. Never trust the compiler in this regard.
QUESTION
I'm reading cpdt book (great thanks to the author!). Author gives (unofficial) exercises. There is an exercise 6 below:
- Using a reflexive inductive definition, define a type nat_tree of infinitary trees, with natural numbers at their leaves and a countable infinity of new trees branching out of each internal node. Define a function increment that increments the number in every leaf of a nat_tree. Define a function leapfrog over a natural i and a tree nt. leapfrog should recurse into the i'th child of nt, the i+1st child of that node, the i+2nd child of the next node, and so on, until reaching a leaf, in which case leapfrog should return the number at that leaf. Prove that the result of any call to leapfrog is incremented by one by calling increment on the tree.
The question is: what datatype does author mean? What I was able to create is kind of
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-07 at 07:57This looks like the adequate data type according to the exercise description.
You can build trees with an arbitrary number of distinct leaves, e.g.
Node (fun n => if n =? 0 then Leaf 3 else Leaf 5)
, Node (fun n => Leaf n)
or Node (fun n => Node (fun m => Leaf (n + m))
.
QUESTION
I am writing this OpenCL code that solves an advection equation using leapfrog scheme. I think I've setup the host code and the kernel code correctly but I am getting CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE during the kernel compilation.
I did look into the kernel compilation log and here is what I get
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-19 at 07:11Two things:
C
is an array or a pointer, but you access it as if it were a scalar value. UseC[some_index]
for accessing the array elements. If it is just a constant, use(*C)
orC[0]
.x_siz
/y_siz
/z_siz
/t_siz
are all inglobal
memory space because they are kernel arguments, regardless if you explicitly writeglobal const int x_siz
orconst int x_siz
. You need to makeprivate
kernel variables, set these to the global variables, and pass the private ones to the function, because function parameters are private by default. So in the kernel, make a variableint x_siz_private = x_siz;
and pass that to the function call. Variables declared in a kernel are in private memory space by default, so you don't need to writeprivate
explicitly. In the assembly, this corresponds to ald
(load from global memory to register) instruction.
QUESTION
I'm trying to test simple leapfrog 2D advection scheme. What I am doing is writing values of each timestep as netCDF4 file. Initial state is set as value of 5.0 in the shape of square. When I print the initial state of the array it looks fine, but when it is written in netCDF4 and look through ncview
it looks slanted. I can't figure out why this is happening. I am suspecting that it could be related to the part where I am writing each timestep value as a netCDF4 data (passing p_tf[0][0]
in the function nc_put_vara_double
). I used the function nc_put_vara_double
just how it was used in their coding samples that is on Unidata website.
Does this problem have something to do with p_tf[0][0]
and it's indices? Why do you use [0][0]
for this function?
Below is the code
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-11 at 17:04It's probably shifted because your count is Nx*Ny
but you appear to be passing a pointer to a memory space of size (Nx+2)*(Ny+2)
, and nc_put_var_double()
has no way of knowing that :)
QUESTION
Background I am writing a simple N-body simulation code in Python, with core physics solvers such as acceleration and position integration implemented in Cython. The code uses the leapfrog method to integrate the positions.
Conditions
- Masses: 10, 100 for 2 bodies; 1 for all bodies for number of bodies > 2.
- Position: Randomly generated
- Velocity: Randomly generated
- Timestep: 1e-3
The bug
- For number of bodies > 2: The bodies repel each other instead of attracting each other.
- For number of bodies = 2: They do not orbit each other but instead travel in straight lines.
- General bug (regardless of number of bodies): Repulsive forces
Expected behavior
- Two bodies must orbit each other
- The forces must be attractive
Efforts to resolve the bug
- Negative sign for acceleration
- Multiply acceleration by -1
- Add a new temporary expression
Code Acceleration function (Cython):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-14 at 09:24The problem is solved: using a better acceleration algorithm solved the problem. The code is now available at GitHub. The only problem now is to animate the plot. Please let me know how to animate it in the comments. Thanks for the help all along!
Here are the results of a two-body simulation:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-24 at 22:10Did you try to save the images with another resolution, using for example dpi=600
as parameter in fig.savefig
?
QUESTION
I need to draw a line between point in my analysis.
I have plotted a 2D histogram, and need to plot some points overlaying this histogram and draw a line between them. I already tried plt.plot()
but neither the points nor lines appear in the plot. If I use plt.scatter()
now the points appear, but I still need to connect the points with a line.
My plot is below:
Any tips in how can I connect those red dots? (I forgot to say it, but i just want to plot some points, in this case 200, not all of them).And the code i used is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-05 at 15:08I do not know what you have in mind, but specifying the plot method's marker argument yields dots connected by lines:
QUESTION
I pretty much deleted the last code and started new. I added a new class called Object which is the replacement for the lists called body_1 and body_2. Also all the calculations are now done from within the Object class. Most previous existing issues were resolved through this process but there is still one that presists. I believe its inside the StartVelocity() function which creates the v1/2 needed to start the Leapfrog algorithm. This should give me a geostationary Orbit but as clearly visible the Satelite escapes very quickly after zooming through earth.
Codes are:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-12 at 07:49The constant G
is in kg-m-sec units. The radius of the satellite orbit however only makes sense in km, else the orbit would be inside the Earth core. Then the speed in m/sec gives a near circular orbit with negligible eccentricity. (Code from a math.SE question on Kepler law quantities)
QUESTION
I have been trying to replicate https://diffeqflux.sciml.ai/dev/examples/BayesianNODE_NUTS/, using different ODE equation, but I have received this result without uncertainty quantification, is it because I did the initial value u0 is higher :
Could you please tell me what was wrong?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-01 at 12:14The most likely reason for this is because the loss function magnitude is too high for the posterior samples, due to which the posterior sample results are out of range and not visible on your plot.
This can be possibly fixed by (a) adding a scaling factor the Neural ODE output and making sure that the loss function does not start from a very high magnitude or (b) increasing the number of layers in the neural network architecture/ changing the activation function.
QUESTION
Considering the following Leapfrog scheme used to discretize a vectorial wave equation with given initial conditions and periodic boundary conditions. I have implemented the scheme and now I want to make numerical convergence tests to show that the scheme is of second order in space and time.
I'm mainly struggling with two points here:
- I'm not 100% sure if I implemented the scheme correctly. I really wanted to use slicing because it is so much faster than using loops.
- I don't really know how to get the right error plot, because I'm not sure which norm to use. In the examples I have found (they were in 1D) we've always used the L2-Norm.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-05 at 13:11Apart from the initialization, I see no errors in your code.
As to the initialization, consider the first step. There you should compute, per the method description, approximations for p(dt,j*dx)
from the values of p(0,j*dx)
and u(0.5*dt, (j+0.5)*dx)
. This means that you need to initialize at time==0
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install leapfrog
Check out this leapfrog project to a place on disk.
Create a new virtual environment.
From the leapfrog checkout, run: pip install -e . (with a period).
Create a new Django project: django-admin.py startproject website
Configure some additional Django project settings, as shown in example/settings.py.
Configure your project's urlconf to include the leapfrog app's urlconfs, as shown in example/urls.py.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page