contributors | Add & update list of Git contributors in package.json | JSON Processing library

It seems an important question to me. Hence, answering here for sake of completeness. This is based on this link shared by @Satya S in the comments. React leaflet v3 won't work with reactJS v18 (as of the time of writing this response, things may change later. Use this link to verify), at least when using concurrent mode. Please try version 4 alpha of React leaflet that targets version 18 of reactJS.

Of course, in your example, attributes like Project::participant or Project::role do not make any sense for representing ternary links.

The UML spec (in 11.4.3.1 Classes) states that

Attributes of a Class are Properties that are owned by the Class. Some of these attributes may represent the ends of binary Associations.

They don't mention the possibility of attributes as ends of non-binary Associations.

In 11.5.4 (page 202), as pointed out by @Christophe, they say

Ownership of Association ends by an associated Classifier may be indicated graphically by a small filled circle, which (...) we will term a dot.(...) The dot shows that the model includes a Property of the type (...). This Property is owned by the Classifier at the other end.

The important concept here is "the other end", which is also called "the opposite end" in other statements of the spec. It implies that there must be a unique other end of the association.

Consequently, since Attributes are association ends (= Properties) owned by the Classifier at the opposite end, they can only be the ends of a binary association.

This implies that for n-ary associations, the participating classes cannot own any end and can therefore not have (reference) attributes like Project::participant.

Also, using common sense: what would be the possible meaning of an attribute like Project::participant (or better: Project::participants)? It could be intended to represent the collection of all Contributor objects that participate in an instance/link of the ternary association Project-Contributor-Role. This could be defined as a derived attribute using an OCL expression. But it does not allow to represent/implement/reconstruct the ternary association.

In OOP, you could have a property like Project::contributorByRole the values of which would be ordered pairs from the Cartesian Product of Contributor and Role. Such a property represents/implements the ternary association. But, afaik, UML does not define Cartesian Product types and does, therefore, not support such tuple-valued properties.

The easiest way to address similar use case is simply to use a clustering plugin, typically Leaflet.markercluster, so that it separates your Markers which are on the same position or very close (actually your 3rd place does not "override" the first, in the sense of replacing, it just sits on top of it, in the sense of overlapping).

The added advantage is that it naturally separates Markers which are very close one to each other, but still at slightly different positions, which below heuristics will not catch.

I got the same problem. Open your terminal and write this:

Git or GitHub cannot protect part of a public repository: if you can access said repository, you would clone everything.

That being said, you could add a content filter driver which would automatically on checkout:

• fetch those files from another source (separate private repository, as commented)
• create them in your local working tree (if your local public repository clone)
• make sure they are ignored locally.

However, any evolution of those files should be synchronized in a local clone of your separate private repository, and pushed from said local private clone.

You import the Leaflet JavaScript file and have your page code within the same HTML

Posting an answer so the question can be closed. It took me a while but I think I figured it out.

Thanks to @SethTisue for pointing me to TwoTails. I was able to correctly synthesize a method using the part of the code in that repo. However the bottom line is doing something like this after the typer is not trivially possible. Here is the reason why:

Say you are trying to synthesize and append a method m to a class C after the typer. The problem is if you are synthesizing this method, you will eventually invoke it somewhere new C().m. The membership is resolved during the typer, so the typer will never complete and throw an error method m is not a member of C. So,

1. If you don't require the package information to achieve this, you should do this after the parser

2. If you need the package information, this gets very tricky. You need to add a few new phases after the parser. I will omit the code because it is very lengthy but here is the gist of it.

   1. Phase 1: Accumulate the list of Class Names you will be appending to and their existing method, skip if it's a pre-known class

   2. Phase 2: Go through the code and accumulate a list of all the symbols that correspond to an instance of this class. ValDef and any parameters to the DefDef. If you have implemented Hindley Milner you will immediately identify the problem that will a way to distinguish similarly named symbols in different scopes. There is a lot of existing literature on this that you can read, I am skipping the details.

   3. Phase 3: Go through the code and accumulate a list of method names that are invoked on C but doesn't yet exist. You need to memorize the parameters and their types as well. Whether you need the return type or not really depends on what you are doing and/or if you want extra soundness/verification in a later step. You can skip this phase if the method you are appending is static and you already know what members will be missing in advance.

   4. Phase 4: Go through the code one last time and append a null method into C that with the proper name and types. Retuning null isn't the best thing, not sure if there is a better alternative.

   5. Later in the typer replace the appended method body with the proper one (the one you are copying)

The actual synthesis looks like this but as I mentioned above, if you actually want this to work, you will need to figure out all the stuff above.

I think there's a mismatching Node version between your local environment and the AWS Amplify's. If you run different versions of Node, the installed dependencies in the npm install will be different so your application will behave differently in both environments, assuming that it builds locally (if don't, there might be another underlying problem).

As you pointed, you can use nvm to set the provision version. Based on How to change Node Version in Provision Step in Amplify Console you can try:

Zoom level can be calculated by _getBoundsCenterZoom()