mocha | ☕️ simple , flexible , fun javascript test framework | Unit Testing library

 by   mochajs JavaScript Version: 10.4.0 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | mocha Summary

kandi X-RAY | mocha Summary

mocha is a JavaScript library typically used in Testing, Unit Testing, Nodejs applications. mocha has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can install using 'npm i superhuman-mocha' or download it from GitHub, npm.

️ Simple, flexible, fun JavaScript test framework for Node.js & The Browser ️.

            kandi-support Support

              mocha has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 22043 star(s) with 3006 fork(s). There are 399 watchers for this library.
              There were 3 major release(s) in the last 6 months.
              There are 259 open issues and 2623 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 215 days. There are 37 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of mocha is 10.4.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              mocha has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              mocha has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              mocha code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              mocha is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              mocha releases are available to install and integrate.
              Deployable package is available in npm.
              mocha saves you 597 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 1377 lines of code, 0 functions and 416 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed mocha and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into mocha implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Initialize a new HTML reporter .
            • Constructs a new Mocha object .
            • Execute a hook
            • Run tests against a filepath
            • Stringify a JSON object .
            • Constructs a new Markdown reporter instance .
            • Initialize a new XUnit reporter .
            • Constructs a new Doc reporter instance .
            • Constructs a new JSON reporter instance .
            • Initialize a new Progress reporter .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            mocha Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for mocha.

            mocha Examples and Code Snippets

            JSDOM + Mocha
            npmdot img1Lines of Code : 1dot img1no licencesLicense : No License
            copy iconCopy
            mocha --require setup.js --recursive path/to/test/dir
            JSDOM + Mocha
            npmdot img2Lines of Code : 1dot img2no licencesLicense : No License
            copy iconCopy
            mocha --require setup.js --recursive path/to/test/dir

            Community Discussions


            How to locally unit-test Chainlink's Verifiable Random Function?
            Asked 2022-Mar-08 at 04:12

            While trying to set up a basic self-hosted unit testing environment (and CI) that tests this Chainlink VRF random number contract, I am experiencing slight difficulties in how to simulate any relevant blockchains/testnets locally.

            For example, I found this repository that tests Chainlinks VRF. However, for default deployment it suggests/requires a free KOVAN_RPC_URL e.g. from Infura's site and even for "local deployment" it suggests/requires a free MAINNET_RPC_URL from e.g. Alchemy's site.


            I adopted a unit test environment from the waffle framework which is described as:

            Filestructure ...


            Answered 2021-Sep-09 at 04:35

            to test locally you need to make use of mocks which can simulate having an oracle network. Because you're working locally, a Chainlink node doesn't know about your local blockchain, so you can't actually do proper VRF requests. Note you can try deploy a local Chainlink node and a local blockchain and have them talk, but it isn't fully supported yet so you may get mixed results. Anyway, as per the hardhat starter kit that you linked, you can set the defaultNetwork to be 'hardhat' in the hardhat.config.js file, then when you deploy and run the integration tests (yarn test-integration), it will use mocks to mock up the VRF node, and to test the requesting of a random number. See the test here, and the mock contracts and linktoken get deployed here



            jest is failing to find `bota` and `atob`
            Asked 2022-Feb-06 at 21:55

            Creating a jest test like:



            Answered 2022-Feb-06 at 21:55

            After much searching and head scratching as to why btoa/atob are available in node but NOT available in jest running in node, I finally figured it out. Jest runs all tests inside a vm, which is an isolated sandbox environment. The btoa/atob methods are not exposed on the global object inside of a VM. Best explained by example:



            angular 13: Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'rxjs/operators'
            Asked 2022-Jan-22 at 05:29

            I have upgraded my angular to angular 13. when I run to build SSR it gives me following error.



            Answered 2022-Jan-22 at 05:29

            I just solve this issue by correcting the RxJS version to 7.4.0. I hope this can solve others issue as well.



            How to fix "Unidentified contract"? OpenSea is unable to “understand” ERC1155
            Asked 2022-Jan-19 at 23:00

            I have deployed a ERC-1155 based contract (based on OpenZeppelin) and minted some NFTs on this contract successfully. But when I want to use these NFTs in OpenSea, it always says "Unidentified contract".



            Following their official Tutorial repository (which does not compile any more because of outdated dependencies and other issues) I have added some (maybe) opensea-specific functions and data that might required for OpenSea in order to work properly. However, OpenSea is able to grab all required data to display an NFT, but as long as they say "Unidentified contract", this all makes no sense so far.

            My question has:

            has someone already managed to deploy a ERC-1155 and used it with OpenSea properly without this issue? Is there anything we have to "register" somehow contracts that are not based on ERC-721?

            🔢 Code to reproduce ...


            Answered 2021-Aug-27 at 22:07

            I finally found the root cause! OpenSea expects a public property called name in order to display the proper Name of the Collection instead of a static label Unidentified contract.

            I came across this while looking at their reference code (which depends on a now 3-year-old MultiToken-Contract implementation and needs all in all some downgrades of Node and other tools in order to get it build [a downgrade to Node 10 worked best for me today] ).



            Why is my code to hide a parent div not working?
            Asked 2022-Jan-16 at 08:40

            I tried following the information here, editing it to match my needs, but so far it's not working. I'm trying to hide a parent div with two child elements. The parent div is part of a list, all with the same classes, and each div has two child elements: an input, and an image. Each input has a unique "data-wapf-label" that I'm trying to select so that I can hide the parent div. The HTML is as follows:



            Answered 2022-Jan-16 at 08:40


            npm ERESOLVE unable to resolve dependency tree NestJs Passport
            Asked 2022-Jan-12 at 22:05

            I have following package.json



            Answered 2021-Dec-28 at 13:15

            To resolve this issue update the "passport" lib version in your package.json: from "passport": "^0.5.2", to "passport": "^0.4.0", so it's same as used in @nestjs/passport@8.0.1.



            Not able to understand the issue in react dependency
            Asked 2021-Dec-21 at 08:36

            I have to use react translation for multiple languages. When I am installing



            Answered 2021-Dec-21 at 07:38

            Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'string')

            I believe the issue is where you are declaring your proptypes for StarRating.



            Eslint Failed to load plugin 'security' declared in '.eslintrc': Cannot find module 'eslint-plugin-security'
            Asked 2021-Dec-15 at 12:31

            My eslint don't work, and I don't know why.

            Here is my eslint file:



            Answered 2021-Aug-28 at 00:23

            Solved it by changing the eslint file to the following:



            Error when import firebase-functions-test when testing with mocha
            Asked 2021-Dec-02 at 09:53

            I am trying to setup a Firebase Cloud Functions repo to run mocha test. However, it throws the following error when I use import * as firebase from "firebase-functions-test"; or const firebase = require("firebase-functions-test")();. You can see in my code that I haven't even called the actual firebase functions yet so I think this a setup issue.

            Question: What change do I need to make mocha test running for Firebase Functions testing using import syntax?

            Working test code



            Answered 2021-Dec-02 at 09:53

            This error should be resolved after specifying the latest version of the

            • firebase-functions, v3.16.0, and

            • firebase-functions-test, v0.3.3.



            Typescript import module.exports sub function
            Asked 2021-Oct-20 at 12:51

            I'm using mocha to test a function and I'm facing an error while running the test file.

            The file structure is as follows



            Answered 2021-Oct-20 at 12:51

            What you're exporting and what you're doing with the import don't match. The problem is (probably) the export. What you have is this:


            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install mocha

            You can install using 'npm i superhuman-mocha' or download it from GitHub, npm.


            DocumentationRelease Notes / History / ChangesCode of ConductContributingGitter Chatroom (ask questions here!)Issue Tracker
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
          • npm

            npm i mocha

          • CLONE
          • HTTPS


          • CLI

            gh repo clone mochajs/mocha

          • sshUrl


          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link