valence | Firefox Developer Tools protocol adapters | Addon library

i have a form created using formbuilder. I created a set of checkboxes using an array containing an id and a name for each value. I have it returning the name of the value checked by the user but i also need the id. Is there an efficient way of returning both the name and the id together rather than doing this separately? as i need the id with the name to manipulate the data later. Thanks in advance.

TS code

I have a tibble songs which is too big to share here. Also, it doesn't matter; the problem applies for any tibble that only has dbl values.

The idea is that I have one row I selected before. It can be any one of them, without any previous knowledge. The first thing I did was to filter it out:

I am working on a data https://www.kaggle.com/rodolfofigueroa/spotify-12m-songs

I wanted to analyze How was the mood of the songs released initially compared with those released in 2020? So I went for plotting year on the x-axis and valence on the y-axis. NOTE- Valence is the Measurement of how positive a track sounds, from 1 (extremely positive) to 0 (extremely negative).

I created this data frame to check the first 20 values and when I am plotting it on the x-axis I am getting row numbers. sorted_df_year['valence'][:20].plot(kind='bar',figsize=(20,5))

My question is how can I change the x-axis label to years (column present in the dataset)?

I would like to add colors to my labels in the legend of 3D plot, but is not working when I tried with a similar method to add colors to a regular plt.plot.

I am having trouble trying to list all the songs in the 5 genres for this question. I have narrowed down the top 5 genres now I am having issues trying to find all the songs in them.

I am trying to print the valence score for each lexicon (word) in a sentence using vader, but I am getting confused in the process. I am able to sort the words in a sentence as positive, negative and neutral using vader. I want to print the valence score as well. How to approach this?

For my thesis, I am making scatterplots in APA format in R. So far, my code is as follows, and it works great for plotting just one variable with confidence interval and regression line:

As I am just learning R, I am not sure how to solve this. I am trying to get a data frame that shows me the following:

(I'm sorry if the question involves too much Mathematics, that's the bane of Mathematical programmation !)

My goal is to visualize finite radii balls in the Diestel-Leader graph DL(p,q). Here is an article by W. Woess which describes with pictures the construction (starting from page 3). I will however give it here with less mathematics to capture the idea.

It is constructed by taking two infinite trees T_p and T_q, each of respective valence p+1 and q+1. We consider height functions h:T_p→Z and h':T_q→Z, meaning that each vertex x with height k has exactly one parent vertex with height k-1 and exactly p (resp. q) children with height k+1.

Now, the vertex set of DL(p,q) is defined to be {(x,y)∈T_p×T_q : h(x)+h'(y)=0}, and two vertices (x,y) and (x',y') are adjacent in DL(p,q) if and only if x and x' are adjacent in T_p and y and y' are adjacent in T_q.

It turns out DL(p,q) is not a tree ! Balls whose radii are greater than 4 always have non-contractible loops.

I am fixing arbitrary elements o∈T_p and o'∈T_q whose heights are zero, and I am willing to plot the sub-graph of DL(p,q) consisting of elements whose distance to (o,o') is at most a certain radius R (that is the ball of radius R). This means that I must find all elements of distance at most R to o in T_p, and of distance at most R to o' in T_q, and then somehow get the adjacencies between couples of such vertices.

Also, I am mainly concerned about the case p=2 and q=3, that is DL(2,3). However, an algorithm in the general case would be more than welcome !

So far, I first tried finding a representation for elements in T_p. I tried implementing the representation given in the paragraph (2.1) Tree and sequences. in the article I linked, but even that seemed doomed. Then, I thought about taking a vertex at height -R, and represent all its children up to the generation R (that is, I would have 2R+1 generations of vertices). To represent a child of a vertex, this corresponds to labelling all the downwards edges with an integer from 0 to p-1. I first used a dec2base conversion algorithm :