blogs | - 📚一个前端的博客。

You need to call .as_view() to turn the (class-based) ViewSet into a function that will dispatch HTTP calls:

Eiterh you go for verbatimTextOutput and renderPrint (you will get a preformatted output) OR for textOutput and renderText and textOutput (you will get unformatted text).

This was a bug of the SDK, now fixed (server-side, so doesn't require a library update).

The block of code in the question is the correct way for increasing ephemeral storage via the Ruby SDK:

If you want to have a different/custom representation of your data than you have to override to_representation(). depth always provides nested data of your current object-data. Meta doesn´t have a feature to level Post and PostsSnapshot at your Blog-representation.

Here you can find an example.

Vim is the god of editors.

Practical Vim Edit Text at the Speed of Thought.pdf

Just cancel it because its version updated

I don't think you need to use new Blog in your test, it will create an instance of Mongoose document (the weird object in your log). Create a Mongoose document is the job of the API. You only need to send the Javascript object.

While I can certainly change the context of $(this) by using $.call(Object, argument) or doing an Object.assign({}, object) somewhere in the code, to manipulate the $.fn.init(selector, context) of jQuery, I have decided to create an alternative Vanilla solution Framework.

And, while jQuery is worth pursuing, I have built this custom CORE jQuery support library in stead. In other words, this framework mimics everything in the jQuery syntax as shown in the minimum code example. I believe that this is also the missing manual that most developers need that is virtually impossible to search these days in the internet due to jQuery's popularity & search ranking wars.

The goal as mentioned in the OP is to try to include only as little jQuery code as possible or implement an alternative solution with the jQuery snippet as needed because jQuery has grown so huge with newer versions and extensions and most of those code have considerable performance overhead other than the learning curve.

With this new CORE, I can easily extend support for jQuery, with $.fn.extend or $.extend or $.prototype.extend and for future use cases whenever the need arises, do another plugin for some basic routines or re-plug $(function()}) or $(document.ready()}) or implement other custom filters and jQuery-like chores, some of which I have already built and stripped off from this code such as event handlers and the $.ajax.

The good news is, we can even reuse already built favorite jQuery plugins without having to worry about compatibility issues because the power of jQuery is already in our hands! The core also preserved our favorite dot notation among others! :D

Overall, this is very handy whenever building minimal, manageable, reusable, modular Javascript, as well as building on top of the missing Vanilla learning curve and understanding how browsers work, especially because the heart of jQuery which is the $.extend is herein preserved. Some of the mechanics of this library though (about 2% of the code), is ported from jQuery and I'm planning to build on top of this CORE for my projects without having to worry about licenses.

That said, I hope this will be helpful to some developers out there. I'm licensing this code with MIT.