FluffyPredator | Fluffy Predator with THREE.js & instanced geometry | Graphics library

 by   nicoptere JavaScript Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | FluffyPredator Summary

kandi X-RAY | FluffyPredator Summary

FluffyPredator is a JavaScript library typically used in User Interface, Graphics, Nodejs, Three.js, WebGL applications. FluffyPredator has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Fluffy Predator with THREE.js & instanced geometry
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              FluffyPredator has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 24 star(s) with 2 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              FluffyPredator has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of FluffyPredator is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              FluffyPredator has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              FluffyPredator has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              FluffyPredator code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              FluffyPredator does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              FluffyPredator releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              It has 209 lines of code, 0 functions and 6 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed FluffyPredator and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into FluffyPredator implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Creates three points
            • Parses meta data .
            • Initializes the face4 .
            • ZD component
            • handle touchstart events
            • Handle touch move events .
            • Initializes the faces .
            • Handle mouse down
            • initialize the uv4 matrix
            • Compute the transform object .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            FluffyPredator Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for FluffyPredator.

            FluffyPredator Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for FluffyPredator.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Three.js indexed BufferGeometry vs. InstancedBufferGeometry
            Asked 2018-Apr-30 at 18:33

            I'm trying to learn more about performant geometries in THREE.js, and have come to understand that an indexed BufferGeometry and InstancedBufferGeometry are the two most performant geometry types.

            My understanding so far is that in an indexed BufferGeometry, vertices that are re-used in a geometry are only added to the geometry once, and each instance of a given re-used vertex are referenced by their index position in the vertex array.

            My understanding of the InstancedBufferGeometry is that this geometry allows one to create a "blueprint" of an object, send one copy of that object's vertices to a shader, then use custom attributes to modify each copy of the blueprint's position, rotation, scale, etc. [source]

            I'd like to better understand: are there cases in which an indexed BufferGeometry will be more performant than the InstancedBufferGeometry.

            Also, in the InstancedBufferGeometry, are there WebGL maximum parameters (such as maximum vertices per mesh) that one must consider so as to avoid making a mesh too large? How are the vertices in an InstancedBufferGeometry counted?

            If anyone could help clarify the situations in which indexed BufferGeometry and InstancedBufferGeometry should be used, and the performance ceilings of InstancedBufferGeometry, I'd be very grateful.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Apr-29 at 00:14

            [...] IndexedBufferGeometry and InstancedBufferGeometry are the two most performant geometry types.

            Yes, BufferGeometries in general are the most performant way to deal with geometry-data as they store data in exactly the format that is used in the communication with the GPU via WebGL. Any plain Geometry is internally converted to a BufferGeometry before rendering.

            You are also correct in your descriptions of the indexed and instanced geometries, but I'd like to note one more detail: In an indexed geometry, the instructions for the GPU how to assemble the triangles are separated from the vertex-data and presented to the GPU in a special index-attribute (as opposed to being an implied part of the vertices for non-indexed arrays).

            I'd like to better understand: are there cases in which an IndexedBufferGeometry will be more performant than the InstancedBufferGeometry.

            They do different things at different levels, so I don't think there are many use-cases where a choice between them makes much sense. In fact, you can even create an instanced geometry based on a "blueprint"-geometry that has is an indexed BufferGeometry.

            Let's dive a bit into the details to explain. An instanced geometry allows you to render multiple "clones" of the same "blueprint"-geometry in a single draw-call. The first part of this, the creation of the blueprint, is identical to rendering a single geometry. For this, the attributes (positions, normals, uv-coordinates and possibly the index for an indexed geometry) need to be transferred to the GPU.

            The special thing for instanced geometries are some extra attributes (in three.js InstancedBufferAttribute). These control how many times the geometry will be rendered and provide some instance-specific values. A typical use-case would be to have an additional vec3-attribute for the instance-position and a vec4-attribute for the quaternion per instance. But it really could be anything else as well.

            In the vertex-shader, these special attributes look just like any other attribute and you need to manually apply the instance-specific updates per vertex. So instead of this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50077508

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install FluffyPredator

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/nicoptere/FluffyPredator.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone nicoptere/FluffyPredator

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:nicoptere/FluffyPredator.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link