openapi | GitHub 's official OpenAPI spec with Octokit extensions
kandi X-RAY | openapi Summary
kandi X-RAY | openapi Summary
GitHub's official OpenAPI spec with Octokit extensions. Amends operations from GitHub's official OpenAPI specification with an x-octokit extension that includes the following keys.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of openapi
openapi Key Features
openapi Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 18License : Permissive (MIT License)
Copy@Bean
public OpenAPI customizeOpenAPI() {
//@formatter:off
final String securitySchemeName = "bearerAuth";
return new OpenAPI()
.addSecurityItem(new SecurityRequirement()
.addList(se @Bean
public OpenAPI customOpenAPI(@Value("${springdoc.version}") String appVersion) {
return new OpenAPI().info(new Info().title("Controller API")
.version(appVersion)
.description("This is a sample server @Bean
public OpenAPI customOpenAPI(@Value("${springdoc.version}") String appVersion) {
return new OpenAPI().info(new Info().title("Foobar API")
.version(appVersion)
.description("This is a sample Foobar server crea Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on openapi
QUESTION
i'm trying to use public publicRuntimeConfig inside a TypeScript plugin with no success. With JS plugins i have no problems. But now i'm really stuck, i think i don't look at the right place.
The question is how can i access to this config in a TypeScript plugin ?
Here's my nuxt.config.js:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 20:42Nuxt makes the $config available in two ways: as this.$config on every component instance, and context.$config passed to "special nuxt lifecycle areas like asyncData, fetch, plugins, middleware and nuxtServerInit" (docs).
It looks like you need to access the $config outside a component, so you'll need to retrieve it early in the request cycle. In particular, since you're mutating the Vue.prototype, this feels like a good fit for a plugin in the Nuxt sense, which isn't quite what you've got in your code.
If you put your plugin file in the plugins directory and reference it from the plugins array in nuxt.config.js (see link above for a broader example), you could rewrite it like this to access $config:
QUESTION
In the OpenAPI docs about parameter serialization there's a short section about how to serialize query, path, header and cookie parameters with different styles. The schema of these parameters are described as OpenAPI flavoured json schema, which allows infinite nesting of objects and arrays. I haven't found any mention about how to deal with these in the docs:
https://swagger.io/docs/specification/serialization/
Let's assume the JSON schema provided for any of the parameters is like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 10:35Short answer: It's undefined behavior.
Most OpenAPI serialization styles are based on RFC 6570, which provides guidance only for:
- primitive values,
- arrays of primitives,
- simple non-nested objects (with primitive properties).
In case of other types of values (nested objects, objects containing arrays, nested arrays, arrays of objects) the behavior is undefined.
Similarly, OpenAPI's own deepObject style is currently defined only for simple objects but not for arrays or nested objects. Here are some related comments from the OpenAPI Specification authors/maintainers:
By the way, is there a reason we couldn't have
deepObjectwork for arrays too? [...]Darrel: Supporting arrays as you describe was my intent. I was supposed to find some canonical implementation to use as a guideline for the behavior, but didn't get around to it.
Ron: If we end up supporting the exploded array notation, it needs to be clear that the first index is 0 (or 1, or -1, or whatever).
(source)
Ron: when we defined
deepObjectin the spec, we explicitly chose to not mention what happens when the object has several levels in it, but in our conversations we went with 'not supported'.
(source)
There's an existing feature request to extend deepObject to support arrays and nested structures:
Support deep objects for query parameters with deepObject style
QUESTION
I can get account details so my authentication appears correct but in trying to modify that code to create an order it returns a code 401 "msg":"Invalid KC-API-SIGN". The modification involved adding in the method and payload and changing endpoint (/api/vi/accounts) to endpoint2 (/api/v1/orders)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 13:45Solved above problem here is the code to post a buy order on KuCoin:
QUESTION
We would like SwaggerUI, which is being generated by Swashbuckle, to show all controllers and methods when debugging as well as on our test environment, but hide some on integration and production environments. Note that the hidden controllers/methods will be functional in all scenarios but won't be documented in SwaggerUI.
To do this I've applied the principal described here.
Which results in following code:
Attribute definition:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 11:35I found the solution in this blog post. Thanks @juunas for this
To solve my issue I've kept the code from the initial question to hide controller methods. To hide controllers I've implemented a IActionModelConvention:
QUESTION
In my GCP project, I have a python API running in a docker container (using connexion). I want to expose the API (with an API key) using API Gateway.
When I deploy the docker container with --ingress internal, I get Access is forbidden. on API calls over the Gateway. So the API gateway cannot access the Google Run container.
When I use --ingress all, all works as expected, but then my internal API is accessible from the web, which is not what I want.
I created a service account for this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 12:12Ingress internal means "Accept only the requests coming from the project's VPC or VPC SC perimeter".
When you use API Gateway, you aren't in your VPC, it's serverless, it's in Google Cloud managed VPC. Therefore, your query are forbidden.
And because API Gateway can't be plugged to a VPC Connector (for now) and thus can't route the request to your VPC, you can't use this ingress=internal mode.
Thus, the solution is to set an ingress to all, which is not a concern is you authorize only the legit accounts to access it.
For that, check in Cloud Run service is there is allUsers granted with the roles/run.invoker in your project.
- If yes, remove it
Then, create a service account and grant it the roles/run.invoker on the Cloud Run service.
Follow this documentation
- Step 4: update the x-google-backend in your OpenAPI spec file to add the correct authentication audience when you call your Cloud Run (it's the base service URL)
- Step 5: create a gateway with a backend service account; set the service account that you created previously
At the end, only the account authenticated and authorized will be able to reach your Cloud Run service
All the unauthorized access are filtered by Google Front End and discarded before reaching your service. Therefore, your service isn't invoked for nothing and therefore your pay nothing!
Only API Gateway (and the potential other accounts that you let on the Cloud Run service) can invoke to the Cloud Run service.
So, OK, your URL is public, reachable from the wild internet, but protected with Google Front End and IAM.
QUESTION
I'm using FastAPI and I need to represent different STIX 2 objects (from MITRE ATT&CK) with a corresponding/equivalent Pydantic model in order to return them as a response JSON.
Let's consider the AttackPattern object.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 08:46A possible and promising approach is to generate the Pydantic model starting from the corresponding JSON Schema of the STIX object.
Luckily enough the JSON schemas for all the STIX 2 objects have been defined by the OASIS Open organization on the GitHub repository CTI-STIX2-JSON-Schemas.
In particular, the JSON Schema for the Attack-Pattern is available here.
QUESTION
I am trying to make a JWT call to storage API using the example listed here with some changes as below -
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 21:27QUESTION
I need to document an API written in pure Flask 2 and I'm looking for what is a consolidated approach for doing this. I found different viable solutions but being new to Python and Flask I'm not able to choose among them. The solutions I found are:
- https://github.com/marshmallow-code/apispec
- https://github.com/jmcarp/flask-apispec
- https://github.com/marshmallow-code/flask-smorest
In order to separate the different API endpoints I use the Flask blueprint. The structure of a MWE is as follows:
I first defined two simple domain objects, Author and Book.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 16:52I encourage you to switch your project to FastAPI, it isn't much different or more difficult than Flask.
FastAPI docs about generating OpenAPI schema
It will not only allow you to generate OpenAPI docs / specification easily. It is also asynchronous, much faster and modern.
See also FastAPI Alternatives, Inspiration and Comparisons to read about differences.
Especially this citation from link above should explain why doing what you try to do may not be the best idea:
Flask REST frameworks
There are several Flask REST frameworks, but after investing the time and work into investigating them, I found that many are discontinued or abandoned, with several standing issues that made them unfit.
QUESTION
Warning message
WARN [io.qua.hib.orm.dep.HibernateOrmProcessor] Could not find a suitable persistence unit for model classes:
- io.quarkus.hibernate.orm.panache.kotlin.PanacheEntity
- io.quarkus.hibernate.orm.panache.kotlin.PanacheEntityBase
The same issue with both io.quarkus:quarkus-hibernate-orm-panache and io.quarkus:quarkus-hibernate-orm-panache-kotlin (PanacheCompanion).
My project has multiple named persistent units and datasources (no default). I'm also using multitenant feature.
...INFO [io.quarkus] Installed features: [agroal, cache, cdi, config-yaml, hibernate-orm, hibernate-orm-panache-kotlin, jdbc-mysql, kotlin, mutiny, narayana-jta, resteasy, resteasy-jackson, security, smallrye-context-propagation, smallrye-jwt, smallrye-openapi, swagger-ui, vertx, vertx-web]
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 01:34It seems that the ORM processor doesn't exclude those base entities, and tries to attach them to a non-existent "default" persistent units. Hence the warning.
I could get rid of it by either define "default" PU or assign io.quarkus.hibernate.orm.panache.kotlin to a named one.
QUESTION
I have create a route that showing openAPI documentation in expressjs using the @wesleytodd/openapi package. The route successfully showing my documentation but I want to set a form that if user wants to see my documentation they must have to log in first (I set for them).
May be it looks like in this question: HTTP authentication cpanel
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-20 at 14:30Welcome to StackOverflow 👋
you can make use of a button, it will depend on your SecuritySchemes authentication as well the generator you are using
and when pressing the button, you will get
images above are from SwaggerHub platform
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install openapi
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
