chtml | An HTML-based component System

The correct tag to check is the View Code Sequence, not the Partial View Code Sequence (that is only for partial views, as the name suggests, which seems not to be your case). In the sequence, you have to check the Code Value for the respective code. For example, MLO images get the code R-10226, as can be seen in the table.

Only if that sequence is not present or empty, you have to check for fallback tags like View Position. View Position is defined for CR and DX images, not for MG images (and actually does not have MLO or CC as defined terms), but as always, derivations from the DICOM standard by some modalities have to be taken into account, and you have to check if the images you process conform to the standard.

In regular Latex, you could do Let $f(x)=x^2$.

However remember that, as the name suggests, MathJax doesn't aim to make all of Latex available to the web but focuses on the math part of Latex (and also AsciiMath and MathML of course). A key thing to remember here is that MathJax actually uses the math delimiters to find where there are content to typeset and when you do Let $f(x)=x^2$, MathJax doesn't do anything about the Let since it is outside the math delimiters.

Nonetheless, there are ways to use regular text in Latex math mode too. For example by means of \text{} so in your case, you could accomplish what you want with $\text{Let } f(x)=x^2$

Now, simply setting the text size of the surrounding content will make all of the Latex bigger:

Thanks to the helpful comments from @J.Riesmeier:

An application claiming conformance to the Basic Application Level Confidentiality Profile (without any options), shall remove the Acquisition Comments (0018,4000) attribute. If the Clean Descriptors Option is supported, the value of this attribute should be "cleaned" instead, i.e. "replace[d] with values of similar meaning known not to contain identifying information and consistent with the VR". Details on this particular option are described in PS3.15 section E.3.5.

I can answer my own question. So basically the scenario should be read as follow:

When 'Clean Desc. Opt.' is not used, the following behavior occur:

1. De-identification Action Code 'Z' is used for Accession Number (0008,0050)
2. De-identification Action Code 'X' is used for Acquisition Comments (0018,4000)

When 'Clean Desc. Opt.' is used, the following behavior occur:

1. De-identification Action Code 'Z' is used for Accession Number (0008,0050)
2. De-identification Action Code 'C' is used for Acquisition Comments (0018,4000)

Reference:

• Table E.1-1a. De-identification Action Codes

MathJax won't process mathematics that contains HTML tags (other than
and comments), so you are right that what you have done is not going to work. But there is a loophole that can be used to get input fields, as discussed in this post that uses the MathML tag to get HTML into the expression.

It looks like Jekyll inserts the math as MathJax

That would have worked (even if it is unnecessary), because the % in TeX marks a comment, so the </code> will be ignored, and so will the closing <code>.

Except that GitHub pages removes line breaks, and so you got

You need to use

One of the ways would be is to use white-space:nowrap; for your formulas:

trying to filter a table using a dropdown-list but I'm not able to keep SelectListItem value selected after submitting the form

You can try to dynamically set Selected property of SelectListItem, like below.

One thing you should ask yourself is why would you want to do this? If you need to insert scripts, doing this from outside Elm is usually a more robust option anyway (for instance this allows the browser to start loading that resource before your Elm application has a chance to load/initialise).

That being said, the main reason you should worry about this is for code that you don't control. The nice thing is that Elm makes it quite difficult to execute supply chain attacks against your code. If you weaken these protections, you might make yourself vulnerable against these. However, it is fairly unlikely that someone will attempt this attack indiscriminately, as it generally won't work against anyone trying to do this.

(If you worry about being a target specifically, then you probably shouldn't be considering weakening any security feature).