forwarder | Generic meta-transaction forwarder

The issue was that the response from the lambda function was a plain json string and not html (as pointed out by @acorbel), hence the load balancer could not process the response, resulting in a 502 error.

The solution was to add http headers and a status code to the response:

You can try below steps:

1. Configure your AWS Elasticbeanstalk environment with the environment variable ENVIRONMENT_NAME = 'Development' or 'QA' or 'Prod'

please refer aws-official-docs for same.

1. Then update config as below:

The DWARF file in the dSYM only has symbol information & debug information in it, it does not contain a complete copy of the binary's TEXT & DATA segments. If there is a copy of the binary next to the dSYM on the file system lldb will load that when it loads the dSYM. Or you can use the target modules add command to tell lldb to load the binary into the current session.

If you insist on using the UF then writing to disk is the way.

If you want to avoid writing to disk and are open to a non-UF solution, then consider Splunk Connect for Syslog (SC4S). It's a docker app that receives syslog streams and sends them to Splunk HEC inputs. See https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/4740/ for more information.

Something like this, using repeat?

Totally possible. Quick test i did:

The better way to perform the "kubectl" commands from your local machine to your private AKS cluster is to use AKS Run Command (Preview). This feature allows you to remotely invoke commands in an AKS cluster through the AKS API. This feature provides an API that allows you to, for example, execute just-in-time commands from a remote laptop for a private cluster. Before using it, you need to enable the RunCommandPreview feature flag on your subscription and install aks-preview extension locally. However, there is a limitation that AKS-RunCommand does not work on clusters with AKS managed AAD and Private link enabled.

In this case, If you want to resolve the FQDN of the private cluster from your on-premise network, you could select to use either the hosts file locally(used for testing) or use your DNS forwarder to override the DNS resolution for a private link resource like this.

The DNS forwarder will be responsible for all the DNS queries via a server-level forwarder to the Azure-provided DNS 168.63.129.16.You can provision IaaS Windows VM with DNS role or Linux VM with bind configured as a DNS forwarder. This template shows how to create a DNS server that forwards queries to Azure's internal DNS servers for Linux VM. Refer to this for DNS forwarder on Windows VM.

If there is an internal DNS server in your on-premise network. The on-premises DNS solution needs to forward DNS traffic to Azure DNS via a conditional forwarder for your public DNS zones(e.g. {region}.azmk8s.io). The conditional forwarder references the DNS forwarder deployed in Azure. You could read this blog about DNS configuration sections for more details.

No, that's not possible. Once the control flow reaches your Node application, an attacker will know that it exists. They will be able to tell the difference between a page that is rendered by the browser on failure to look up a domain name in DNS, and a page you return to them. Besides, they won't be using browsers to investigate targets, so they will see quite a bit more than what a user in a browser would.

I think your best bet would be to copy & paste one of those annoying domain parking pages that web hosts put on a domain when it was purchased but isn't yet hosting a page yet. Ideally you would use the parking page of the domain registrar you used to acquire your domain because it will be the most believable. And of course, try to replicate the entire message (including headers), not just the HTTP body. Unlike the idea of serving a fake "can't resolve domain" page, this one should be entirely possible.

The problem with this was after upgrading spring boot you now need to use a yml structure like this: