spa | SPA Performance Analyzer for analyzing Oracle database AWR | Monitoring library

For me, this is a natural fit for awk:

Mayby you are missing

While I can certainly change the context of $(this) by using $.call(Object, argument) or doing an Object.assign({}, object) somewhere in the code, to manipulate the $.fn.init(selector, context) of jQuery, I have decided to create an alternative Vanilla solution Framework.

And, while jQuery is worth pursuing, I have built this custom CORE jQuery support library in stead. In other words, this framework mimics everything in the jQuery syntax as shown in the minimum code example. I believe that this is also the missing manual that most developers need that is virtually impossible to search these days in the internet due to jQuery's popularity & search ranking wars.

The goal as mentioned in the OP is to try to include only as little jQuery code as possible or implement an alternative solution with the jQuery snippet as needed because jQuery has grown so huge with newer versions and extensions and most of those code have considerable performance overhead other than the learning curve.

With this new CORE, I can easily extend support for jQuery, with $.fn.extend or $.extend or $.prototype.extend and for future use cases whenever the need arises, do another plugin for some basic routines or re-plug $(function()}) or $(document.ready()}) or implement other custom filters and jQuery-like chores, some of which I have already built and stripped off from this code such as event handlers and the $.ajax.

The good news is, we can even reuse already built favorite jQuery plugins without having to worry about compatibility issues because the power of jQuery is already in our hands! The core also preserved our favorite dot notation among others! :D

Overall, this is very handy whenever building minimal, manageable, reusable, modular Javascript, as well as building on top of the missing Vanilla learning curve and understanding how browsers work, especially because the heart of jQuery which is the $.extend is herein preserved. Some of the mechanics of this library though (about 2% of the code), is ported from jQuery and I'm planning to build on top of this CORE for my projects without having to worry about licenses.

That said, I hope this will be helpful to some developers out there. I'm licensing this code with MIT.

This might help....

There is an open issue on how Azure hosted agents authenticate back to ADO using the az-pipelines command.

Feel this is related but if it's not feel free to respond and I'll remove the answer.

Adding a few newlines can really help with the readability of your code.

Take advantage of shell arrays:

If you are using angular-cli, simply set projects..architect.build.configurations.production.outputHashing to "none" in your angular.json

You can setup a deploy script inside package.json that runs the appropriate command since there is no way to build firebase-cli tools for every framework and custom integration, you want to inject the deploy command at the end of your own build scripts

"cross-env NODE_ENV=staging quasar build && firebase deploy --only hosting:admin"

Additionally, you also have the "use" feature built-in, but this is more to manage multiple projects with the same site https://firebase.google.com/docs/cli#project_aliases

I also suggest reading the multiple apps per project scenarios demonstrated here: https://firebase.google.com/docs/projects/learn-more#best-practices

If your state is only in memory, I would expect to lose it. To keep it around, you need to save it somewhere to be reloaded when the user comes back to your site. Local storage is a good option.

If you are using redux for state management, for example, you can use redux-persist to save & load your redux store in local storage.

https://www.npmjs.com/package/redux-persist

I dont know how you are sending the static files of angular. But here is an full example. Your problem is how are you serving the static files.