webpack-base | A webpack base for your project sparkles | Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | webpack-base Summary
kandi X-RAY | webpack-base Summary
A webpack base for your project :sparkles:
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of webpack-base
webpack-base Key Features
webpack-base Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on webpack-base
QUESTION
When I use Sass files in NextJs, I am getting 'conflicting order
' warnigs from mini-css-extract-plugin
. The conflict always messes up my stylings on build
. You can see the error described in the following link:
This is an article with a solution to this issue but it talks about ordering Sass files for only one page. I'm not sure how to do order when there are multiple pages. How can I tackle the conflicting order
issue?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-10 at 19:32if you are using nextjs 9.3 or higher you can use it like css modules. At least this is how they recommend that you do it.
This is an example.
You can also check the Sass support on the Next.js docs.
-- Update
The best way of do it it's by creating a different scss module for each component. It will look something like this.
QUESTION
I have Vue v2 SPA. This is standard application as it can be. Let it be hello-world
from the documentation. Let's make it and build:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-25 at 10:43You need to create a vue.config.js
file in your project root, and set the publicPath option:
QUESTION
I'm trying to use the optimized, es6 build of Mobx, as per the documentation:
Tip: the main entry point of the MobX 5 package ships with ES5 code for backward compatibility with all build tools. But since MobX 5 runs only on modern browsers anyway, consider using the faster and smaller ES6 build: lib/mobx.es6.js. For example by setting up a webpack alias:
resolve: { alias: { mobx: __dirname + "/node_modules/mobx/lib/mobx.es6.js" }}
This allows me to import mobx
and get the mobx.es6.js
build:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-25 at 20:44The solution is to add a browser
section to package.json
:
QUESTION
I'am trying to handle development and production eviroment variables in my webpack configuration (see https://webpack.js.org/guides/production/), but it fails with
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-02 at 15:07Well,it is working. I didn't notice that the error takes place on a total different spot of my code. I was doing a tutorial about HMR with webpack and express. An it's this lines of code in the express setup which causes the trouble:
server.js
QUESTION
I have debug-time Typescript decorator @log
, which logs input/output/stats of the decorated functions.
I'd like to totally strip this particular @log
decorator when compiling release version.
It is easy to remove console.log statements from the release build or do things conditionally in the decorator code, but I would like to make sure there's no overhead with calling decorator function itself.
Is there any way this can be achieved with Typescript?
My project is webpack-based. If this is not possible with Typescript, maybe this can be done at later stage with Babel plugin, with UglifyJS or some other alternative plugin?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-05 at 05:12When asking this question, I totally overlooked one embarrassingly trivial aspect. Decorator function itself is only invoked once per method declaration. If decorator is evaluated at initialization time to no-op function, overhead will only occur at initialization time and it will be pretty minimal as demonstrated in the code below.
Class instantiation and runtime function calls to the functions, marked with the @log
decorator, will be free from any overhead.
QUESTION
We have a hybrid Angular app that uses karma for unit testing. I'm trying to add our first suite of tests but I'm getting some errors that indicate karma cannot find the dashboard.component.html
.
View:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-05 at 19:20I fixed it by doing the following:
In karma.config.js
I added this line:
QUESTION
Building a MEVN application.
When running in my development environment, there are two servers running concurrently: webpack-dev-server at localhost:8080
serving up the Vue/Webpack-based front-end client application, and localhost:8081
serving the Node+Express back-end application which provides the RESTful endpoints that the client consumes.
When deploying for production, however, the Node+Express server, in addition to providing those endpoints, also serves the static Vue/Webpack application as described in this answer.
My issue is this: To call one of those endpoints from the client in the production environment, since they're all coming from the same server, I can just load /route/to/my/endpoint?param=val
or similar. In the dev environment, since they're two separate servers, I'd load http://localhost:8081/route/to/my/endpoint?param=val
instead.
It seems like there must be some trivial way to include the http://localhost:8081
in the code when running the webpack-dev-server, but omit it when building for deployment.
I've seen a few articles talking about the publicPath
webpack config item, but none of them are quite addressing this issue in a way that makes sense to me.
What's the "right way" to do this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-22 at 16:32Figured it out a bit more quickly than I expected to.
An easy way to do this is with Webpack's definePlugin
mechanism, which is nicely described here.
Essentially, in the plugins
section of my webpack.dev.conf.js
I added this:
QUESTION
I'm building a Single Page (Web) Application. I'm quite smitten by Rails v5.0, especially its built-in API capabilities.
In the past I've built JavaScript frontends using Vue.js
, usually with the templates provided by the Vue-CLI project
. This allows deployment of Vue component-based
static sites basically anywhere. It's great.
Now, Rails 5.1
has some built-in Webpack and Yarn features which look pretty compelling too. I'm not sure how to proceed with my new application.
My questions:
- What are the pros/cons of integrating Webpack and Vue into Rails itself, using the Webpacker extensions available in Rails v5.1? I intend to deploy to Heroku.
- On the other hand, what are the pros/cons of using the Rails API-only mode for the backend, and maintaning the Vue/Webpack-based frontend in its own directory? I'd keep everything in the same repository, deploy the backend via Heroku, and the frontend via a static host like Netlify.
- Which approach would have more cognitive overhead or technical complexity?
Over the past few days, I've been looking around, and I've not found much concise information on the web about this. People seem interested in the auto-reloading features of the Rails development environment, but I get that for free already with Vue-CLI.
As far as I can discern, these are reasons for keeping them separate:
- Deployment of the frontend is pretty darn simple to anywhere.
- The Webpacker mode for Rails is very new, and not many tutorials or guides exist yet, especially regarding integration testing. Keeping things separate means that my existing testing apparatus should still apply.
Here are some pros for integrating the two parts together:
- The possibility of using static assets both for the frontend and possibly for server-generated pages in the future, should that be necessary.
- Buy-in to "the Rails way", with implied future maintenance by the Rails team.
- the JS Frontend would not need to be hosted separately.
- Don't need to worry about CORS (?)
What other concrete benefits exist for either approach?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jan-19 at 14:43When i started i went the webpacker way, somewhow because that's what it looked like it was "supposed" to be. As you say, very little guidance. Webpacker (with it's reliance on the latest node) seems a moving target, making deployment and even development more complex. For what benefit i asked and got rid of it.
Now i use vue from the cdn. Benefits:
- cached close to user
- almost zero installation
- easy to have dev/production versions
The i write app code into the rails templates. Using haml, and in fact ruby2js, but you can use javascript just fine. That's how i started, but i like ruby, and the ruby code is almost half the size than the generated js, but i'm getting off track.
So templates are your "vue annoted" rails templates. Small code also goes into the rails template. More code can be defined in the assets and referred to from the app. Even components can be written into template using the x-template syntax.
And last but not least: Data can be transferred by to_json, directly into the templates. And in the same render. Much faster than an additional query. When to_json is not enough one can use rabl to get exactly what is needed.
I hope i made that clear. I am in the process of writing some vue-rails stuff up, as there is so little to be found. Look out here (and i'll comment when the post is ready)
QUESTION
I'm using webpack for build my application (angular2/typescript) and I reach create two files, one for my code and one for vendors. But i want a third file for separate my config (principally for API_ENDPOINT) which is used directly in my code.
How can I use my config file (config.ts) for build my app with loaders but exclude it from the generated Js file ?
Currently
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-28 at 09:23Can you show me your webpack config?
Because you want three output files (internal script, vendor script and config) you have to define in webpack config file :
- three entry points in the entry section (entry: [ precise our entry point here])
- in the output section use 'filename: "build.[name].js"' in order to generate as many files as the entry point contains.
Then you can insert these files in your html by using a dynamic tool because your name will be dynamic
Hope that's help you
QUESTION
I've an old application that is at Java 1.6, Servlet 2.5 and deployed as WAR on a Websphere Application Server 7.x version. Now, I'm trying to add a newly written page with Angular2 framework and typescript.
My web.xml has the following servlet mapping.
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-12 at 18:58Adding the context root in the base href was the right solution.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install webpack-base
This will compile files in the dist folder.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page