level4 | Use W3C CSS Level 4 Modules Today with PostCSS
kandi X-RAY | level4 Summary
kandi X-RAY | level4 Summary
Use W3C CSS Level 4 Modules Today with PostCSS. Take advantage of future techniques like variables, custom selectors, color functions, and new pseudo selectors.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of level4
level4 Key Features
level4 Examples and Code Snippets
License : Strong Copyleft (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Copy{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-}
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
{-# LANGUAGE KindSignatures #-}
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperatoCommunity Discussions
Trending Discussions on level4
QUESTION
Here is an example from Shiny documentation.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-04 at 15:29You need the labFormat argument, instead of labels. In ?addLegend you have an explanation.
This works as you want:
QUESTION
I am really new in C#, please don't hate me for this.
I'm trying to print a list of sellers.
The list is based on 4 bonus tier/levels , depending on how many articles those sellers sold.
Level1: under 50 articles
Level2: 50-99 articles
Level3: 100-199 articles
Level4: for over 199 articles.
When printing, you should count which level they reached, based on how many articles they sold.
The program should also write the output to a file.
I've created below program that does the job, but i am stuck in the part where the sorting/printing happens.
The code ...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 12:12QUESTION
I have three Groups - CAPITAL, FIXED ASSET & CURRENT ASSET (pink color), If the row has another row under it, then it will become a parent(orange color).
When I add a new row (level 1) at the bottom of the group, it will sum the value to the parent and group. But actually it should only sum to the group as it is in level 1 and it has no child under it.
The X meaning the amount should not appear at the row. It should not sum to the parent as it is not the child of the parent. How do I make the level 1 always sum to the group only?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 08:53I modified your jquery function a little. All the rows have class that defines their level. Add to the total only if the child row level is higher than that of the parent row.
QUESTION
In my JSFiddle/Code Snippet(Just an example, mine is a dynamic table)
I have three Groups - CAPITAL, FIXED ASSET & CURRENT ASSET (pink color), The row will be child(white color) if no other row under it. If the row has another row under it, then it will become a parent(orange color).
Users only can input value in the child. The total value of the child in the group will show at the rows of group and parent(if have) **Rows that have color background cannot insert value
I want to calculate the total amount based on the group and the grand total amount. For now, I only success calculate the grand total amount as shown in my JS Fiddle or code snippet. JS Fiddle I do not have any idea on how to calculate based on group condition for the table and calculate up the amount. Does anyone have an idea??
This is the current result that I get:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-07 at 07:24I've added the following function to your code, it should work as you want.
QUESTION
Given the following table/code, I'd like to add or adjust three items. I don't know Jquery well enough as I just learn programming within two months and this code was refer from other places and I made some adjustment for it. Anyone who could help me I will be very appreciate, I have try this expand and collapse function for two weeks but I still cannot get the result that I want so I post here to ask for help.
Here are the three items:
- For the parent that do not have child will not show '+' when I click on the hide all, for example in my fiddle, the capital share and capital contribution does not have child below it but it still appear '+'. Please see the image attached [Current Result & Expected Result]
- When I show all, I want to show '-' for the parent or child that able to collapse as a group. Please see the image attached [Expected Output Result]
- After I click Hide All, when I click expand the Fixed Assets, It should only appear Building and Computer, not including the child of Building and Computer. When I click expand on the building, then it only expand the accum. dprn building. Please see the image attached [Expected Result]
Here is the table I'm using:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-26 at 12:57You are missing one thing here. When you are adding a ".closed" class on collapse you are adding it to all the "#mytable tr.collapse.level0". Instead, write an (if statement) and only add ".closed" class to those elements who have a sibling whose class contains ".level1".
QUESTION
I am trying to convert a csv file (in this example the tibble tree) into a nested html file like the one below. I did it expressing the csv file in MarkDown and the using pandoc.
What is the best way to do it with R? Is there an adequate package(s) to use? Is it also possible also in R to transform the html result inserting class and span in certain HTML elements?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-23 at 20:40dat <- tibble::tribble(
~level1,~level2,~level3,~level4,
"Beverages","Water","","",
"Beverages","Coffee","","",
"Beverages","Tea","Black tea","",
"Beverages","Tea","White tea","",
"Beverages","Tea","Green tea","Sencha",
"Beverages","Tea","Green tea","Gyokuro",
"Beverages","Tea","Green tea","Matcha",
"Beverages","Tea","Green tea","Pi Lo Chun"
)
paths <- data.frame(pathString = apply(dat, 1, paste0, collapse = "/"))
library(data.tree)
tree <- as.Node(paths)
LL <- as.list(tree)
L <- LL[-1]
library(htmltools)
f <- function(node, nodeName){
if(all(lengths(node) == 0) && length(names(node))){
tagList(
tags$p(nodeName),
do.call(tags$ul, unname(lapply(names(node), tags$li)))
)
}else{
if(length(names(node))){
tags$li(
tags$p(nodeName),
do.call(tags$ul, mapply(f, node, names(node), SIMPLIFY = FALSE, USE.NAMES = FALSE))
)
}else{
tags$li(
tags$p(nodeName)
)
}
}
}
lis <- mapply(f, L, names(L), SIMPLIFY = FALSE, USE.NAMES = FALSE)
ul <- do.call(tags$ul, lis)
html <- as.character(tagList(tags$p(LL$name), ul))
QUESTION
I'm ripping my hair out on the following so I'm kindly asking for help here.
I have an array of durations in minutes whose total is one day (1440 min.)
I have another array with a value which represent a protection level : 0 to 5.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-24 at 20:27I suggest you create another array level_at_min where the index is a minute in the day.
level_at_min will be of size 1440 (I show an algorithm to do it later).
In your example you will have
QUESTION
I feel like I'm missing something rather obvious. I would like to query my graph so that I get all the "leafs", so any class that does not have a subclass. Basically, I need the inverse of rdfs:hasSubClass (I tried rdfs:superClassOf but it doesn't not exist ahaha).
For example, when I query for the lowest level of the classes by using WHERE {?level1 subClassOf ?level2 ?level2 subClassOf ?level3 ?level3 subClassOf ?level4 etc.}
I eventually end up with kind of what I want: some of the leafs. But if I then join this result to the leafs of one level higher, I also receive the parent classes of the leafs of the query above, which I do not want. I only want children classes, no parents, if that makes sense.
The goal is to be able to output a list of classes that can be instantiated.
Looking for any tips in the right direction! Thank you!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-28 at 08:07An RDF triple looks like rdfs:subClassOf .` - so in your SPARQL query you would use a triple pattern ?sub rdfs:subClassOf ?sup . and either select ?sub or ?sup
to get all leaf nodes just get all classes that do not have a subclass. Absence of something is done via FILTER NOT EXISTS clause. Like select distinct ?cls {?cls rdfs:subClassOf ?sup . FILTER NOT EXISTS{?sub rdfs:subClassOf ?cls FILTER(?sub != ?cls && ?sub != owl:Nothing ) }}
Credits to UninformedUser for this solution!
QUESTION
I have a JavaScript Object like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-26 at 21:26first of all i dont think you have an object with the same key multiple time. I assume its just to showcase different properties. If you like to keep the object immutable you can do it this way: (but it depends on your usecase).
Not 100% sure what you mean with dynamically?!
QUESTION
I have a struct definition as
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-24 at 22:05You've almost got it. The result of the sort_by block should be what you want to compare against. You want to use the index in levels, not an Array which contains the index in levels.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install level4
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
