preprocessor | A future-facing CSS preprocessor | Plugin library

I am running a FastAPI (v0.63.0) web app that uses SpaCy (v3.0.5) for tokenizing input texts. After the web service has been running for a while, the total memory usage grows too big, and SpaCy throws MemoryErrors, results in 500 errors of the web service.

A similar question is already asked, but the answer did not help me solve my problem: Sklearn components in pipeline is not fitted even if the whole pipeline is?

I'm trying to use multiple pipelines to preprocess my data with a One Hot Encoder for categorical and numerical data (as suggested in this blog).

Here is my code, and even though my classifier produces 78% accuracy, I can't figure out why I cannot plot the decision-tree I'm training and what can help me fix the problem. Here is the code snippet:

In just starting to use JMeter I am trying to set variables of the form taskId_1, taskId_2, taskId_3 (defined in "User Defined Variables") and use them in HTTP Samples (REST requests). When I run postprocessors none of my JSON Extractors or Regular Expression Extractors save the values matched (and I tested the extracted regular expression using RegExp tester.)

The response sent from the GET request that I am parsing looks like (edited for readability):

as far as I'm concerned, constants and definitions in c/c++ do not consume memory and other resources, but that is a different story when we use definitions as macros and put some calculations inside it. take a look at the code:

Is there a way in Fortran to omit the size when declaring a named constant array? I just find it unnecessary to count array elements.

I have something like the following in mind

I have this dataset with target LULUS, it's an imbalance dataset. I'm trying to print roc auc score if I could for each fold of my data but in every fold somehow it's always raise error saying ValueError: y should be a 1d array, got an array of shape (15, 2) instead.. I'm kind of confused which part I did wrong because I do it exactly like in the documentation. And in several fold, I get it that It won't print the score if there's only one label but then it will return the second type of error about 1d array.

I'm getting the following error with GCC >=9 and std>=11 merely by adding the header (MacOSX on MacBook Pro 2020 and armadillo installed with Homebrew and the code is compiled with standard CMake configuration) #include to my project.

Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "___emutls_v._ZN4arma19mt19937_64_instanceE", referenced from: __GLOBAL__sub_I_Test_HPP.cpp in Test_HPP.cpp.o ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Test_HPP] Error 1 make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Test_HPP.dir/all] Error 2

I've tried various hacks including optimization flags e.g. O2, O3 etc. but finally adding the preprocessor header #define ARMA_DONT_USE_WRAPPER apparently resolved the issue for now but I need an explanation to feel settled. If the above pre-processor is absolutely necessary to compile the code, should the armadillo library maintainers absorb the macro within the library itself? This kind of issues may take a lot of time to resolve as it is not originated in any programming logic.

I have a C# project that has some solution wide defines in Conditional compilation symbols, see here

I now want to unit test that code and I need to undefine some of those variables. For Unit testing I have a xUnit project that references the solution with the defines.

Is it possible in VS2019 to disable those defines?

Edit In my specific case I have a Unity project added to my solution. Unity has Unity-specific code that cannot be executed in unit tests such like xUnit.

In order to cope with that, I wrap Unity-specific code (like Logging via Debug.Log) into a define UNITY_2020 that is automatically defined by the Unity project-file.

Now on the unit test side I want to undefine said preprocessor UNITY_2020. As I have the source code (no DLL or nuget), I hope that there is a way to compile and run my unit tests without having troubles with Unity-specific code.

So far, putting #undef UNTIY_2020 at the top of my test files does not help.

I have a set of #defines like that: