block-comments | A prototype for block editor based comments | Editor library

by tomjn JavaScript Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | block-comments Summary

block-comments is a JavaScript library typically used in Editor applications. block-comments has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This plugin swaps out the comment form for a block editor based input! It has no settings, and it does whitelist the blocks to a small subset of text based and embed blocks. This repository also contains helper methods for swapping input and textarea elements with block based editors. This will function with the built in block editor, but for optimal results please install and activate the Gutenberg editor. This plugin doesn't provide a block sidebar panel.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

block-comments has a low active ecosystem.

It has 27 star(s) with 2 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 3 open issues and 2 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 1 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of block-comments is current.

Quality

block-comments has no bugs reported.

Security

block-comments has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

block-comments does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

block-comments releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of block-comments

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

block-comments Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for block-comments.

block-comments Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for block-comments.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on block-comments

⌘ + ⇧ + / not available as keyboard shortcut for 'toggle block comment'

Lenient JSON Parser for Python

How can I keep certain semantic actions out of the AST in boost::spirit::qi

QUESTION

⌘ + ⇧ + / not available as keyboard shortcut for 'toggle block comment'

Asked 2020-Jul-05 at 14:47

Since ⌘ + / is the shortcut for toggling line-comments, I wanted to set ⌘ + ⇧ + / as the shortcut for toggling block-comments. If I try to put this as the shortcut in the shortcut editor, the help menu pops up instead of letting me type the combination.

I have searched if this combination is already being used anywhere else, but couldn't find any.

Now how do I set ⌘ + ⇧ + / as the keyboard shortcut for toggling block-comments?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jul-05 at 14:43

This is global macOS system shortcut. You will need to disable or change it.

System Preference > Keyboard > App Shortcuts > Show Help menu

I'm on macOS 10.14 Mojave, it's possible that the location of this setting might have slightly changed.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62741338

QUESTION

Lenient JSON Parser for Python

Asked 2019-Jun-23 at 04:39

Is there a "lenient" JSON Parser for Python?

I keep getting (handwritten) JSON files such as this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jun-23 at 04:39

Okay, so @warl0ck's comment made me think that I might be better off writing my own "JSON Preprocessor" to do the heavy-duty cleanup.

So, here it is in my BitBucket Snippet, complete with a simple unit test.

I've tested it with my corpus of human-generated malformed JSON files, and it seems to work well so far...

Let me know if there's a bug in there code.

But for the time being, I'm content.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56697942

QUESTION

How can I keep certain semantic actions out of the AST in boost::spirit::qi

Asked 2018-Aug-26 at 23:05

I have a huge amount of files I am trying to parse using boost::spirit::qi. Parsing is not a problem, but some of the files contain noise that I want to skip. Building a simple parser (not using boost::spirit::qi) verifies that I can avoid the noise by skipping anything that doesn't match rules at the beginning of a line. So, I'm looking for a way to write a line based parser that skip lines when not matching any rule.

The example below allows the grammar to skip lines if they don't match at all, but the 'junk' rule still inserts an empty instance of V(), which is unwanted behaviour. The use of \r instead of \n in the example is intentional as I have encountered both \n, \r and \r\n in the files.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Aug-26 at 23:05

What you are wanting to achieve is called error recover.

Unfortunately, Spirit does not have a nice way of doing it (there are also some internal decisions which makes it hard to make it externally). However, in your case it is simple to achieve by grammar rewrite.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52005150

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install block-comments

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: