slack-message | Send Slack messages from terminal | Notification library
kandi X-RAY | slack-message Summary
kandi X-RAY | slack-message Summary
Send messages from your terminal directly to the Slack channel. The idea for this was published in mikaelbr/open-source-ideas.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Send a message to a slack
- Send message to slack
- Generate a message for a slack message
- Generate message object
- show errors
- Delete token from file
- Start a spinner .
- Gets a token from a file .
- Save a token to a file
- Determines if a token exists .
slack-message Key Features
slack-message Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on slack-message
QUESTION
I've added github action that sends a message on our slack channel on every release.
I've managed to get repo name and tag from github context, but I'm also trying and failing to get release title and release notes in that message. I've tried these combinations:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 17:15Instead of triggering on the tag, trigger on the release creation. That way the release information will be present.
QUESTION
I'm trying to run falco and falcosikick container in a docker compose.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-17 at 09:48Configurations for falco and falcosidekick must be in 2 different files, it means you also need to mount a volume in falcosidekick container. You can also use environment variables if you prefer (but it implies your slack webhook url will be in clear text in your docker-compose file).
QUESTION
I am updating the problem statement since input from nipuna, who solved the problem. The question is better described as, "why does unmarshal, then marshal of JSON result in changes to the JSON that are not compatible with a REST API request?" The reason discovered, and that I could not have discovered alone, were that the text fields sometimes needed to be included and sometimes omitted in a JSON array, and the marshal data structure did not support omitting them. The structure did use the term "omitempty" for these fields, so it could be believed this directive would omit them, however that is not sufficient. I also needed for the text fields to be pointers. The original problem description follows below. The final data structure uses both "omitempty" for the text fields and also makes the anonymous struct a pointer. (Please see the accepted answer)
I have a REST request that fails when I use Go Unmarshal / Marshal but it works on the same JSON data from a file. I have verified that the resulting []byte from reading the file is different if I take that exact []byte and roundtrip UnMarshal / Marshal it. As a result, my REST request fails. Here it is diagramatically: file json -> []byte = set A of bytes. file json -> []byte -> UnMarshal -> Marshal -> []byte = set B of bytes. Set A of bytes != set B of bytes. I would not care except that I need to modify the data in the structure of Go, then Marshal it, however the byte changes that I do not understand causes the request to fail.
Here is test code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-21 at 04:59I can see following differences and I have mention some suggestions.
Optional fields
Your data consist of array of blocks
, in first block, there is only two fields text
and type
and in second block there is all other fields but no text
. So that text
is optional and it need to be omit when it is an empty struct. So you need to define your SlackRequestData
with omitempty
and pointer type to Text
fields.
Suggested SlackRequestData
struct is something like below.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install slack-message
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page