acquit | Parse BDD-style tests | Functional Testing library

I think you might be running into trouble with your regular expression.

You are trying to knock out all characters that match this: \(.*\). The problem is that the characters "(" and ")" also match .*, so your expression matches ( + anything, including parentheses + ), and this is likely taking out a whole swath of words you don't intend to remove.

One solution would be to use reluctant quantifiers instead of greedy quantifiers. Use *? in place of * to achieve this. It will match the smallest amount of characters that fulfills your regular expression. Another option would be to explicitly exclude parentheses in the regex, as in \([^()]*\).

Try this:

You should use it like $.rewards[0].['total_reward_EUR'] to access the total_reward_EUR property of first object at rewards array in your json.

Imagine next scenario:

1. Thread 1 check instance == null and find this condition true.
2. Thread 2 check instance == null and find this condition true.
3. Thread 1 acquire lock.
4. Thread 2 attempt to acquire lock, it is already acquired so Thread 2 waits.
5. Thread 1 initialize instance = new DclSingleton().
6. Thread 1 release lock.
7. Thread 2 acquire lock.
8. Thread 2 initialize instance = new DclSingleton(). We have double initialization.

1. No. When you create an instance of B and pass that to the A constructor, a reference to the same B instance is passed. There is no copy done. If you want that, you would have to make a copy of it yourself. One way is with copy.deepcopy (although note that there are certain types that cannot be copied -- a threading.Lock instance being one of them). Essentially the new reference (that you store in A's self.other_class) is another name for the same instance.

2. The reason your two blocks of code are able to execute at the same time is that you have created two different locks. You create one in the class A constructor -- that one is being locked/unlocked by thread_modify_attr. The other one is being created in the main thread code just before the sub-thread is created and is being locked and unlocked by the main thread. If you want the two to utilize the same lock, pass (a reference to) the lock into the thread function as an argument. Because they are not the same lock, there is nothing preventing both threads from executing concurrently.

3. Locks can protect whatever you want them to protect. It's the responsibility of your code to determine what is protected by the lock. That being said, you could create a lock in the constructor of your class. Then whenever anything references the class instance, you could use the lock associated with the instance to synchronize access. A common pattern is to centralize control of object resources within the class. So that an outside agent simply asks the object to do something (by calling one of its methods). The object then uses the lock internally to protect its data structures.

python scoping rules are described here

From method boundingRectWithSize:options:attributes:context:

https://developer.apple.com/reference/foundation/nsstring/1524729-boundingrectwithsize :

"This method returns the actual bounds of the glyphs in the string"

What is missing is the margins of the cell, which can be accessed with cell.layoutMargins:

You can achieve your desired result making a small change to lapply. We will use an anonymous function to apply factor to each column.