dreamobjects | DreamObjects Backup Plugin for WordPress | Content Management System library

by Ipstenu PHP Version: v4.0.2 License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | dreamobjects Summary

dreamobjects is a PHP library typically used in Web Site, Content Management System, Wordpress applications. dreamobjects has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This is the development repository for the DreamObjects Backup plugin.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

dreamobjects has a low active ecosystem.

It has 10 star(s) with 5 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 7 open issues and 13 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 113 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of dreamobjects is v4.0.2

Quality

dreamobjects has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

dreamobjects has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

dreamobjects code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

dreamobjects does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

dreamobjects releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed dreamobjects and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into dreamobjects implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Checks if code point is within range
Dispatch a value .
Tokenize input string .
Apply handler options .
Apply options to the request .
Create an instance from a file extension .
Expands a match expression .
Decompose a string
Encrypts a message .
Apply retry configuration .

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

dreamobjects Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for dreamobjects.

dreamobjects Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for dreamobjects.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on dreamobjects

Is there an easier/generic way of implementing this switch statement?

Should I use nginx reverse proxy for cloud object storage?

QUESTION

Is there an easier/generic way of implementing this switch statement?

Asked 2021-Nov-21 at 19:40

I am making a small game in which a Player object is able to move around a 2x2 matrix of other objects (DreamObjects, in this context). The Player is able to move onto Space objects. I will later implement other objects; but all extend the parent DreamObject. Now, to implement movement of my Player, I have to always check if the object infront of it is an instance of a certain object. In the code shown below, for each direction the player intends to move in, I check if the object there is an instance of Space; if it is, I swap their locations and update the world. In the future I will add Monsters, stationary objects and etc. The problem I am encountering is the fact that I will repeat a lot of code with the only difference being how I apply arithmetic on the row and columns depending on direction of movement. I was thinking of applying a Generic class, but I am not seeing the implementation since the operation is different for each Direction enum. What do you think? Is there a better way I am not seeing?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Nov-21 at 16:59

I would extract just the indices in the switch and put everything else in a generic method. You have to define valid initial values for playerX/playerY and dreamLocationX/dreamLocationY:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70056571

QUESTION

Should I use nginx reverse proxy for cloud object storage?

Asked 2020-Mar-31 at 12:54

I am currently implementing image storing architecture for my service.
As I read in one article it is a good idea to move whole
image upload and download traffic to the external cloud object storage.
https://medium.com/@jgefroh/software-architecture-image-uploading-67997101a034

As I noticed there are many cloud object storage providers:

- Amazon S3
- Google Cloud Storage
- Microsoft Azure Blob Storage
- Alibaba Object Storage
- Oracle Object Storage
- IBM Object Storage
- Backblaze B2 Object
- Exoscale Object Storage
- Aruba Object Storage
- OVH Object Storage
- DreamHost DreamObjects
- Rackspace Cloud Files
- Digital Ocean Spaces
- Wasabi Hot Object Storage

My first choice was Amazon S3 because
almost all of my system infrastructure is located on AWS.
However I see a lot of problems with this object storage.
(Please correct me if I am wrong in any point below)

1) Expensive log delivery

AWS is charging for all operational requests. If I have to pay for all requests I would like to see all request logs. and I would like to get these logs as fast as possible. AWS S3 provide log delivery, but with a big delay and each log is provided as a separate file in other S3 bucket, so each log is a separate S3 write request. Write requests are more expensive, they cost approximately 5$ per 1M requests. There is another option to trigger AWS Lambda whenever request is made, however it is also additional cost 0,2 $ per 1M lambda invocations. In summary - in my opinion log delivery of S3 requests is way to expensive.

2) Cannot configure maximum object content-length globally for a whole bucket.

I have not found the possibility to configure maximum object size (content-length) restriction for a whole bucket. In short - I want to have a possibility to block uploading files larger than specified limit for a chosen bucket. I know that it is possible to specify content-length of uploaded file in a presigned PUT urls, however I think this should be available to configure globally for a whole bucket.

3) Cannot configure request rate limit per IP numer per minute directly on a bucket.

Because all S3 requests are chargable I would like to have a possibility to restrict a limit of requests that will be made on my bucket from one IP number. I want to prevent massive uploads and downloads from one IP number and I want it to be configurable for a whole bucket. I know that this functionality can be privided by AWS WAF attached to Cloudfront however such WAF inspected requests are way to expensive! You have to pay 0,60$ per each 1M inspected requests. Direct Amazon S3 requests costs 0,4$ per 1M requests, so there is completely no point and it is completely not profitable to use AWS WAF as a rate limit option for S3 requests as a "wallet protection" for DOS attacks.

4) Cannot create "one time - upload" presigned URL.

Generated presigned URLs can be used multiple times as long as the didnt expired. It means that you can upload one file many times using same presigned URL. It would be great if AWS S3 API would provide a possibility to create "one time upload" presigned urls. I know that I can implement such "one time - upload" functionality by myself.
For example see this link https://serverless.com/blog/s3-one-time-signed-url/
However in my opinion such functionality should be provided directly via S3 API

5) Every request to S3 is chargable!

Let's say you created a private bucket. No one can access data in it however.... Anybody from the internet can run bulk requests on your bucket... and Amazon will charge you for all that forbidden 403 requests!!! It is not very comfortable that someone can "drain my wallet" anytime by knowing only the name of my bucket! It is far from being secure!, especially if you give someone direct S3 presigned URL with bucket address. Everyone who knows the name of a bucket can run bulk 403 requests and drain my wallet!!! Someone already asked that question here and I guess it is still a problem
https://forums.aws.amazon.com/message.jspa?messageID=58518
In my opinion forbidden 403 requests should not be chargable at all!

6) Cannot block network traffic to S3 via NaCL rules

Because every request to S3 is chargable. I would like to have a possibility to completely block network traffic to my S3 bucket in a lower network layer. Because S3 buckets cannot be placed in a private VPC I cannot block traffic from a particular IP number via NaCl rules. In my opinion AWS should provide such NaCl rules for S3 buckets (and I mean NaCLs rules not ACLs rules that block only application layer)

Because of all these problems I am considering using nginx
as a proxy for all requests made to my private S3 buckets

Advantages of this solution:

I can rate limit requests to S3 for free however I want
I can cache images on my nginx for free - less requests to S3
I can add extra layer of security with Lua Resty WAF (https://github.com/p0pr0ck5/lua-resty-waf)
I can quickly cut off requests with request body greater than specified
I can provide additional request authentication with the use of openresty
(custom lua code can be executed on each request)
I can easily and quickly obtain all access logs from my EC2 nginx machine and forward them to cloud watch using cloud-watch-agent.

Disadvantages of this solution:

I have to transfer all the traffic to S3 through my EC2 machines and scale my EC2 nginx machines with the use of autoscaling group.
Direct traffic to S3 bucket is still possible from the internet for everyone who knows my bucket name!
(No possibility to hide S3 bucket in private network)

MY QUESTIONS

Do you think that such approach with reverse proxy nginx server in front of object storage is good?
Or maybe a better way is to just find alternative cloud object storage provider and not proxy object storage requests at all?
I woud be very thankful for the recommendations of alternative storage providers.
Such info about given recommendation would be preferred.

Object storage provider name

A. What is the price for INGRESS traffic?
B. What is the price for EGRESS traffic?
C. What is the price for REQUESTS?
D. What payment options are available?
E. Are there any long term agreement?
F. Where data centers are located?
G. Does it provide S3 compatible API?
H. Does it provide full access for all request logs?
I. Does it provide configurable rate limit per IP number per min for a bucket?
J. Does it allow to hide object storage in private network or allow network traffic only from particular IP number?

In my opinion a PERFECT cloud object storage provider should:

1) Provide access logs of all requests made on bucket (IP number, response code, content-length, etc.)
2) Provide possibility to rate limit buckets requests per IP number per min
3) Provide possibility to cut off traffic from malicious IP numbers in network layer
4) Provide possibility to hide object storage buckets in private network or give access only for specified IP numbers
5) Do not charge for forbidden 403 requests

I would be very thankful for allt the answers, comments and recommendations
Best regards

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Mar-28 at 11:16

Using nginx as a reverse proxy for cloud object storage is a good idea for many use-cases and you can find some guides online on how to do so (at least with s3).

I am not familiar with all features available by all cloud storage providers, but I doubt that any of them will give you all the features and flexibility you have with nginx.

Regarding your disadvantages:

Scaling is always an issue, but you can see with benchmark tests that nginx can handle a lot of throughput even in small machines
There are solution for that in AWS. First make your S3 bucket private, and then you can:
- Allow access to your bucket only from the EC2 instance/s running your nginx servers
- generate pre-signed URLs to your S3 bucket and serve them to your clients using nginx.

Note that both solutions for your second problem require some development

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60658066

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install dreamobjects

You can download it from GitHub.
PHP requires the Visual C runtime (CRT). The Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2019 is suitable for all these PHP versions, see visualstudio.microsoft.com. You MUST download the x86 CRT for PHP x86 builds and the x64 CRT for PHP x64 builds. The CRT installer supports the /quiet and /norestart command-line switches, so you can also script it.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: