health-checks | Laravel health checker | Monitoring library
kandi X-RAY | health-checks Summary
kandi X-RAY | health-checks Summary
Add health checks to your Laravel applications with this package.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of health-checks
health-checks Key Features
health-checks Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on health-checks
QUESTION
I believe I have a pretty straight forward set up but I am receiving the dreaded "backend service is unhealthy" notification on my load balancer in google cloud. I will list out steps I have taken so far to provide as much info as possible as I know this could be many things.
- I created a VM in compute engine hosting wordpress
- I created an unmanaged instance group linked to that VM
- I created a load balancer (HTTPS),
- I created a HTTP backend service linking to my instance group
- I created a health check, protocol HTTP, port 80, left everything else as default
- I created a new front end HTTP, port 80, premium, reserved a new static IP address
- I pointed my domain at the new load balancer
It's worth mentioning at this point I tested I could access the web page stored on the VM without any issues.
- I then created a HTTPS front end, protocol HTTPS, port 443, premium
- I set the value of the IP to be the same as the value of the static IP I reserved when creating the HTTP front end.
- I created a new google cloud managed certificate, which was provisioned successfully
At this point I tested again and could no longer access the site and I received the 502 error on the web page.
- I created two firewall rules both set to ingress, allow-health-checks, 130.211.0.0/22 35.191.0.0/16. the only difference between the two is one is set to tcp 80 and one is set to tcp 443, I was just trying to cover off both in case. I also did try one without the other but that made no difference.
Now I am pretty stuck as I am not seeing any other potential steps I could take to resolve this issue.
I would be grateful for any potential solutions.
Cheers
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-11 at 11:14I managed to overcome this issue by following this guide. https://www.jiyuulife.net/google-cloud-cdn-for-gcp-wordpress/ In case anyone has similar issues.
There isn't a lot of good material out there for unmanaged IG's linked to existing VM's. I found even googles documentation to be a little light on the subject. Sometimes you do want to provide load balancing to existing VM's to make use of CDN without the redundancy or expense.
I welcome additional contributions here.
QUESTION
I am trying to deploy a mastodon server using this project: https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon
I am running Docker-Compose and Podman on a Fedora 33 server.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-09 at 17:01I have found a solution: removing networks' definition.
It sounds cheap, but it worked.
So the final docker-compose.yml
looks like this:
QUESTION
In Google Cloud blog they say that if Readiness probe fails, then traffic will not be routed to a pod. And if Liveliness probe fails, a pod will be restarted.
Kubernetes docs they say that the kubelet uses Liveness probes to know if a container needs to be restarted. And Readiness probes are used to check if a container is ready to start accepting requests from clients.
My current understanding is that a pod is considered Ready and Alive when all of its containers are ready. This in turn implies that if 1 out of 3 containers in a pod fails, then the entire pod will be considered as failed (not Ready / not Alive). And if 1 out of 3 containers was restarted, then it means that the entire pod was restarted. Is this correct?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-09 at 10:28For Pods with multiple containers, we do have an option to restart only single containers conditions applied it have required access.
Command :
QUESTION
I have an ECS cluster with multiple nodes (task defs) fronted by an application load balancer. Does it make sense to configure a health check at the load balancer and at the container level (within the task definition)?
The load balancer runs the configured health check against every registered target so it can unregister failing nodes. Setting the health check at the container level accomplishes the same thing: ECS will unregister any container that fails the health check (according to your configuration). ECS will always instantiate more instances of your task def to satisfy your desired count.
To me it sounds like if your task definition only has a single container, then only setting the health check at the load balancer (since it's required) is enough. Am I missing anything?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-15 at 00:45Unregistering means different things in case of a load balancer and in case of ECS. In case of a load balancer unregistering means that there is no further traffic sent to the container. In case of an ECS service, unrigestering means that the container is killed and the ECS service will attempt to replace it with a healthy one.
Even if you have just a single container, in case of a failure the load balancer will stop sending traffic to it, but it is not the load balancer's job to restart the container. Replacing the container with a healthy one should be done by an ECS service scheduler.
QUESTION
I was learing about HealthChecks following the information posted on the MSDN site: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/host-and-deploy/health-checks?view=aspnetcore-5.0#register-health-check-services
The following code snippet tells that if an unhealthy checks returns I can overwrite the value by saying it's degraded instead.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-23 at 14:27It is quite confusing, because you expect that the HealthCheck gives you back automatically the result you defined on the failureStatus
property, but your HealthCheck explicitly returns Unhealthy
.
If you take a look at the AddHealthCheck
method on GitHub, you will see in only creates an instance of HealthCheckRegistration
.
QUESTION
I'm evaluating the use of Microsoft Health Checks to improve routing of our internal load balancer. So far I'm very happy with the functionality provided by this feature and the community around it. However there's one thing I did not find yet and wanted to ask if it is possible out of the box:
The Health Checks seem to retrieve their own status as soon as they are requested. But because our service might have a hard time processing a lot of request in that given moment, the query to a thrid-party component like the SQL Server might take it's time to respond. Therefore, we would like to pre-evaluate that health check periodically (like every few seconds) and return that state when the health check api gets called.
The reason is, that we want our load balancer to get the health state as quickly as possible. Using pre-evaluated results seems to be good enough for our use case.
Now the question is: Is it possible to add a kind of "poll" or "auto-update" mechanism to the ASP.NET Core health checks? Or does this mean I have to implement my own health check returning values from a background service which pre-evaluates the results periodically?
...Please note, I want to use pre-evaluated results on each request which is NOT HTTP Caching where the live result is cached for the next requests.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-08 at 08:27Short Version
This is already available and can already integrate with common monitoring systems. You may be able to tie Health Check directly into your monitoring infrastructure.
The details
The Health Check middleware covers this by periodically publishing metrics to a target, through any registered classes that implement the IHealthCheckPublisher.PublishAsync interface method.
QUESTION
I've a golang program which I need to add a new call to the K8S API server
status (livez) api to get the health status.
https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/health-checks/
The program should run on same cluster of the api server and need to get the /livez
status, I've tried to find this API in client-go lib but didn't find a way to achieve it...
https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go
Is there a way to do it from Go program which is running on the same cluster that the API server run?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-05 at 13:46OP requested I modify my answer to show configs for "fine-tuned" or "specific" service accounts, without using cluster admin..
As far as I can tell, each pod has permissions to read from /healthz
by default. For example, the following CronJob
works just fine without using a ServiceAccount
at all:
QUESTION
I was reading this article https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/host-and-deploy/health-checks?view=aspnetcore-3.1#filter-health-checks and couldn't visualize a practical use case for using filter health checks. In a real world situation, when would I use this? Thanks!
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-08 at 10:13In the same page you shared, you can see the following:
Health probes can be used by container orchestrators and load balancers to check an app's status. For example, a container orchestrator may respond to a failing health check by halting a rolling deployment or restarting a container. A load balancer might react to an unhealthy app by routing traffic away from the failing instance to a healthy instance.
Use of memory, disk, and other physical server resources can be monitored for healthy status.
Health checks can test an app's dependencies, such as databases and external service endpoints, to confirm availability and normal functioning.
As you can see, there are multiple different types of health checks.
I can see two reasons:
- Different reporting purposes
- Group items for specific monitoring client. One could be a systems division and one a database division
- Performance reasons
- Assesing the health of the database might take time. You might need to raise these during the nighttime, while others every 5 minutes. Filtering will execute the proper ones.
QUESTION
I've configured health checks using the middleware in an MVC application, but have been asked to enforce https on the health endpoint for security reasons. For separate reasons, I can't enforce it across the service as a whole, and so I was wondering if there was a mechanism to selectively do this to just the health endpoint. While it's possible to do this with a controller, but I can't seem to achieve it for the endpoint created by the middleware.
Is there any built-in way to achieve this? Could I create some sort of custom middleware as a wrapper to achieve it?
I've looked into EndpointBuilders, conventions, RequireHttps, and more, but have been unable to find anything.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-29 at 09:06It can be solved by specifying port number for https in Startup#Configure
QUESTION
My Configuration is same as below.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-23 at 02:00The documentation for the fullconn
setting covers this a bit.
Since it's hard to get this value right, haproxy automatically sets it to 10% of the sum of the maxconns of all frontends that may branch to this backend (based on "use_backend" and "default_backend" rules). That way it's safe to leave it unset. However, "use_backend" involving dynamic names are not counted since there is no way to know if they could match or not.
https://www.haproxy.com/documentation/hapee/latest/onepage/#4.2-fullconn
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install health-checks
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page