storyteller | A WordPress theme for multimedia storytelling | Content Management System library

A cast expression like (int)i is indeed not an lvalue. A compound literal, however, is an lvalue:

I don't intend for this method to be overloaded. I want it to be available to the end user whenever it makes sense for it to be available. There will only be one of these p methods, and it should take only one (relatively simple) signature.

This simplifies the exercise quite a bit. The solution is... to do nothing special.

We don't want to pollute the global space with a second namespace.

1. When developing a library, you can do this inside your MyLib namespace so that there is no pollution => it is convenient because you can simply use ranges:: inside the MyLib scope, whatever the header or the source file.
2. When developing a simple project, you can do this in a "define.hpp" file because it is up to you to decide what ranges:: means (the standard protects your right to alias it or not following if you already have a ranges class for example).

So yes, it is OK as long as you don't pollute one's people global scope with your API.

After page is pulled getMovieTitles() should chcek if there are any more pages - if so, cycle with next page until all is downloaded.

I added new internal function loadNextPage() to do the actual work to your code, and accumulation of the result in dataUntilNow :

Both links show the button for me, so it's most likely that you're looking at a cached version in the second screenshot.

Force a refresh in your browser (ctrl-F5/cmd-R) to make sure it loads the latest data.

If that doesn't fix it, it may be that one of the edge caches somehow didn't flush the old data. While this is uncommon, if it happens you can fix it by redeploying the site using firebase deploy.

If that still doesn't fix the problem, it might be worth it to reach out to Firebase support for personalized help in troubleshooting.

The problem is you are creating a single row in HTML and from your script you are setting column values. This will result in displaying only the last row.

Instead, you should dynamically create rows from your script. For each document a new row. There are couple of options:

• Method 1: Use insertRow() and insertCell() methods after obtaining the table object using document.getElementById('tableId')
• Method 2: Prepare the HTMl for all rows dynamically and then set innerHTML of tbody
• Method 3: Use createElement(), createTextNode() to create row, column, text values and then use appendChild() to append the element at the appropriate place.

Here is the running example with method #1 mentioned above. You may try in other ways too. In the example data is hardcoded in an array.

I believe GCC is wrong to reject the modified code.

[namespace.udecl]

1 Each using-declarator in a using-declaration introduces a set of declarations into the declarative region in which the using-declaration appears. The set of declarations introduced by the using-declarator is found by performing qualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.qual], [class.member.lookup]) for the name in the using-declarator, excluding functions that are hidden as described below.

3 In a using-declaration used as a member-declaration, each using-declarator's nested-name-specifier shall name a base class of the class being defined. If a using-declarator names a constructor, its nested-name-specifier shall name a direct base class of the class being defined.

So first I'd note that paragraph 3 makes a distinction between a base and a direct base. Therefore we can name a::f in a using declaration. Secondly, according to paragraph 1, name lookup proceeds as one would expect

[class.qual]

1 If the nested-name-specifier of a qualified-id nominates a class, the name specified after the nested-name-specifier is looked up in the scope of the class ([class.member.lookup]), except for the cases listed below. The name shall represent one or more members of that class or of one of its base classes (Clause [class.derived]).

[class.member.lookup]

1 Member name lookup determines the meaning of a name (id-expression) in a class scope. Name lookup can result in an ambiguity, in which case the program is ill-formed. For an id-expression, name lookup begins in the class scope of this; for a qualified-id, name lookup begins in the scope of the nested-name-specifier. Name lookup takes place before access control.

So a::f is to be looked up only in the scope of a or its own base classes. It should not be looked up at all in b. I would argue that therefore the accessibility of the name f in b should not affect the accessibility of the name f in a when doing qualified name lookup.

In a, f is public. And so can be named by a qualified-id in any declarative region where a may be named. That includes c. And so the using declaration uses a valid name for a valid member of a base class. That is accessible in that declarative region. It is therefore valid.

As another data point, GCC has no problem with the accessibility of a::f in other uses. For example, GCC allows forming a pointer to member to a::f inside the scope of c.

Luckily the text file has a structure that we can use to tell when each record starts. The trick is to just accumulate description lines until the metadata "Founded Year" shows up. At that point we can grab key/value pairs from the following rows that contain a colon and assume that the record ends when those k/v pairs end.

EDIT

This can be a whack-a-mole-game where you have to tweak the conditions to make up for inconsistencies in the text. In the end, they may be too great to account for and the text would have to be "normalized" by hand. I added a second check to make up for differences in the "founding year" key to fix this one.

This is a Javascript answer.