http-auth | whole site on the development time | Content Management System library
kandi X-RAY | http-auth Summary
kandi X-RAY | http-auth Summary
Enabling this plugin allows you to set up HTTP Authentication on your site. You can easily set username and password for HTTP Authentication.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Show more plugins .
- Render HTTP auth settings .
- Save user settings
- Add a restriction to the WordPress settings .
- Updates the HTTP auth settings
- Apply auth settings
- Add the settings page .
- Add the settings page
- Setup the constants .
- Load plugin textdomain .
http-auth Key Features
http-auth Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on http-auth
QUESTION
I have create a route that showing openAPI documentation in expressjs using the @wesleytodd/openapi
package. The route successfully showing my documentation but I want to set a form that if user wants to see my documentation they must have to log in first (I set for them).
May be it looks like in this question: HTTP authentication cpanel
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-20 at 14:30Welcome to StackOverflow 👋
you can make use of a button, it will depend on your SecuritySchemes
authentication as well the generator you are using
and when pressing the button, you will get
images above are from SwaggerHub platform
QUESTION
I have a large NodeJS application that have been working just fine after beeing processed by Webpack-5. Now I added http-auth and then the application crashes.
On https://github.com/MorganLindqvist/webpack5-http-auth-failure you can find a very minimalistic version of the app that crashes in the same when executed after Webpack5.
Here is an example of when it works (without webpack 5) and then when it crashes (with webpack 5).
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-05 at 23:14As it so happened, I ran into this issue today and found your question in an attempt to find a solution.
After trying a few different things, I discovered that using version 4.1.2 of http-auth (instead of the current 4.1.4, which is what your package.json has set in your GitHub repo) worked for me. So it seems to be a bug with the newer http-auth versions. I ran your code in your github repo but with version 4.1.2 of http-auth and it ran successfully.
QUESTION
I'm quite new to factory-boy and I'm trying to send a request to an API endpoint in my unit test, which requires a user to be authenticated. The endpoint expects a token in the header in the form of 'Bearer ' + token
. I've looked at a few examples online and this is what I've come up with so far in my unit test:
test_user.py
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 18:57You're using factory.Factory
instead of factory.django.DjangoModelFactory
.
factory.Factory
doesn't automatically save to the db, so you can either switch to DjangoModelFactory
, or run self.user.save()
manually
You also don't need self.client = Client()
, as self.client
already exists
QUESTION
Trying to implement security with the inbound communication from twilio https://www.twilio.com/docs/usage/security
I understand how the validating twilio request works. However I am having trouble understanding the basic http-authentication. Namely,
If you specify a password-protected URL, Twilio will first send a request with no Authorization header. After your server responds with a 401 Unauthorized status code, a WWW-Authenticate header and a realm in the response, Twilio will make the same request with an Authorization header.
Does this mean twilio will send us a request without any username or password, then we will responds with 401 and they will make the same request but with the username and password? So there are two trips? what's the point of that?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-18 at 00:03I guess the point is so your server can respond with the relevant type of authorization it expects in the WWW-Authenticate
header so that Twilio knows whether to use basic or digest to authenticate.
It's pretty standard HTTP stuff...
QUESTION
I have a server (VPS) with the following services:
- email server (postfix/dovecot)
- dns server (bind9)
- http server (nginx)
Fail2ban creates a lot of entries in iptables and this causes the server to become very slow and even sometimes it becomes unreachable and I have to login via the console and flush iptables before I can connect to the server. The used jails are shown below:
- Jail list:
dovecot, named-refused, nginx-botsearch, nginx-http-auth, nginx-limit-req, php-url-fopen, postfix, postfix-auth, recidive
95% of bans are triggered by postfix jail.
I reduced iptables size by setting recidive jail with :
bantime = 7200
findtime = 3600
maxretry = 5
, the system slowness slightly improved but still not enough.
My question : - is fail2ban to blame for this slowness? or iptables itself? In a previous project, I had no fail2ban installed and I used iptables with many entries (more entries than what my actual fail2ban creates) and the system was fast.
I appreciate any advice on how can I deal with this fail2ban issue.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-19 at 08:21Both of them are to blame. Fail2Ban monitors your logs - so if there is a lot of logging, Fail2Ban will have to parse more text. IPtables performs linear search over the list of rules - it is not possible to use binary search as this will break the logic. So the more rules - the slower IPtables will be.
You should check the usedns
and banaction
settings in /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf
. DNS queries may be slow and you may want to try iptables-ipset-proto4
instead of iptables-multiport
as an action.
QUESTION
a Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS VPS running nginx is presently bricked in terms of serving pages through port 443. This happened unexpectedly, I assume when a renewal kicked in automatically.
Following are twice replicated steps.
I removed all site definitions in sites-enabled and reduced the server to its simplest expression: one application in http mode only. The output of nginx -T is at bottom. the unencrypted pages serve as expected.
I then ran sudo certbot --nginx
and selected 1
for the only 3rd level domain available to nginx
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-18 at 09:28These lines
QUESTION
There is an Nginx server configured for SSO authenticatio with one domain using krb5 and spnego-http-auth-nginx-module
How can you configure dual domain authentication?
The solution is preferably using Nginx without Apache, if available.
Config sources:
- /etc/krb5.conf
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-17 at 23:01- Combine domains keytab files (source)
QUESTION
EDIT
log after Dockerfile correction (add -y parameters)
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-28 at 08:37The Docker build is failing because the apt
command prompts the user for confirmation. To fix this, you can use the -y
flag to install silently:
QUESTION
Although similar to Google cloud functions http authentication, my question is more specific towards Google Identity Platform (https://cloud.google.com/identity-platform).
I am new to GCP. I have created a username/password provider in Identity Platform. I created a sample flask app client and used FireBaseUI to perform basic user login. I am able to get the accessToken in the client.
Then I created a Cloud Function (select unauthenticated as per the above thread). Then passed the accessToken in "Authorization: Bearer" header. I am able to access the token inside the Cloud Function.
But the next part I am unable to figure out is how do I validate that token against Identity Platform and get the user details?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-06 at 02:54To verify a token, you will want to retrieve the value of the passed in "Authorization" HTTP header. This will be a string that starts with "Bearer ". The remainder is a JWT token that can be passed to verifyIdToken() and you will be returned a decoded token that has been verified. From that data you will be able to use the properties within (eg. "email").
See:
QUESTION
I'm trying to setup an nginx server (1.19.0) on Ubuntu (18.04) which uses current version of spnego-http-auth-nginx-module.
I successfully built nginx with spnego module, and it works as expected without auth_gss enabled.
I set up my keytab file as stated in ifad's fork.
With this keytab file, when I run command
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-25 at 10:44Keytab file includes principals created with AES256-SHA1 encryption. However I forgot to check This account supports kerberos aes256 bit encryption checkbox in the Active Directory Users and Computers. So Clients were trying to send RC4-HMAC encrypted Kerberos tickets to NGINX.
Checking this option solved the problem.
Hope this helps.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install http-auth
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page