coverage-badge | Create badges/shields for your Python test coverage | Unit Testing library
kandi X-RAY | coverage-badge Summary
kandi X-RAY | coverage-badge Summary
Create badges/shields for your Python test coverage!
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Get the total coverage .
- Generate a badge .
- Saves a badge .
- Parse command line arguments .
- Return color for given number .
- Return a badge .
coverage-badge Key Features
coverage-badge Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on coverage-badge
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-20 at 04:09The pull request that made this change was here. https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/pull/51107
They appear to be discussing reverting the change until a change can be made to the TypeScript compiler to allow packages to define multiple canonical names for an exported module: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/42764
This change went into @types/node@14.14.27
, so in order to fix this problem you'll need to re-install your @types/node
and set the version to 14.14.26
.
This results in the behavior you're expecting:
Alternatively, if you need something provided in a later version of @types/node
and can't revert to an earlier version, you can still access the other import by moving your cursor over the red underlined missing import and using Ctrl+.
or Cmd+.
if you're on a mac, and choosing the second option to import from path
instead of node:path
. You can also click the little yellow lightbulb above.
QUESTION
My work is making a React UI Kit/Component Library to be used internally for our products. Everything is working fine while developing and displaying on Storybook.
While testing the library in a generic project out-of-the-box from create-react-app, importing and implementing the components made without React Hooks are alright, but soon as we use the ones made with Hooks - the Invalid Hook Call error shows: https://reactjs.org/warnings/invalid-hook-call-warning.html
Have tried everything listed there(and read and tried the github thread solutions linked on the page), and the component simply used useRef()
and nothing else so we know no rules were broken, React and React-dom versions are up to date, and running npm ls react
and npm ls react-dom
in the project results in react@16.10.2
and react-dom@16.10.2
and nothing else... So it doesn't seem like we have multiple React's?
Any help would be much appreciated!!
This is the UI Kit's package.json
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-21 at 18:26Looking at the webpack config, I could see that, UI kit is getting bundled with react
included which might be causing the issue.
To avoid this you could use webpack externals.
https://webpack.js.org/configuration/externals/
The externals configuration option provides a way of excluding dependencies from the output bundles. Instead, the created bundle relies on that dependency to be present in the consumer's environment. This feature is typically most useful to library developers, however there are a variety of applications for it.
So you could update UI Kit webpack config to not include react
and the peerDependencies should take care of the dependency handling for any consumers of the library.
Updated webpack.config
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install coverage-badge
You can use coverage-badge like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page