gret | A collection of Blender tools | Addon library

You class structure would be like this

You need to mark on_message as an event. Simply add @client.event on top of async def on_message(message) and it should work! Edit: you will need to add client.process_commands() to your on_message() as well

This is because, you are using the function name (an element in React) for __html:

You are accessing the firestore data incorrectly in mapStateToProps.

state.firestore.ordered.projects is an array of the projects in the correct order. You are using the id as the array index so you will not find a match.

You can access a project by id, but you need to be looking in state.firestore.data.projects instead. This is the dictionary of projects keyed by id.

You need to add a hidden field named _destroy to the form for each nested model. Default the value to 0 (which is "don't destroy") and then change it to 1 when they click the checkbox.

Then you need to make sure you accept id and _destroy in the params in the controller.

And you need this in your model:

I think the problem is the test. In particular, the way that you send the information in the body because you send an Object but the MockMvc needs a String with the JSON format to simulate a real request from outside of the API.

The way to fix the problem is:

Foreword: The question was asked on November 30, that's why the month and day part seems like today.

Zero values are parsed properly, but there is no "Month 0". The first month is January which has numeric value 1. Similarly, there is no 0th day of month, the first day in every month is 1.

time.Date documents that:

The month, day, hour, min, sec, and nsec values may be outside their usual ranges and will be normalized during the conversion. For example, October 32 converts to November 1.

So if you pass 0 for month and day, that is interpreted the same as passing 1 to month and day, and adding -1 to each.

See this example:

That's a badly designed schema. Allthough it's technically allowed, putting elements of different types in the same array will make every client suffer.

If you can change the server side you're talking to, they should use a more user-friendly schema, like this:

Firstly, you have to identify the root cause of your problem to proceed further. I would suggest you to collect more information on the topic with -XX:+PrintGCDetails and -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps. If your hypothesis that "Old Gen" pool is never frees the space is correct (honestly spearking, it's not obvious from the image), you might apply few tricks to deal with it as such:

• Directly specify new and old gc sizes via -XX:MaxNewSize, -XX:NewSize, -XX:MaxOldSize, -XX:MaxOldSize to ensure that there is enough space for old generation
• Gather more logs via -XX:+PrintGCDetails and -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps to see if any issue happens due to over utilizing of one of the generations
• Try to increase survivor space ratio via -XX:SurvivorRatio to expedite collection of the old generation objects