raytrace | The speed difference is explained at http : //www | Computer Vision library
kandi X-RAY | raytrace Summary
kandi X-RAY | raytrace Summary
The speed difference is explained at Updated for Python 3.x. You'll need to install two packages.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Trace a ray
- Finds the distance between two plane points
- Return the normal vector
- Get color from object
- Intersect two objects
- Find the distance between two spheres
- Compute the diffuse color of the moon
- Create a noise matrix
- Compute the gradient of the image
- Moon function
- Compute the Bm of a point
- Calculate the light
- Calculate the color of a scene
- Extracts value from x
- Return the normal vector of the moon
- Return the cross product of two vectors
- Add a plane
- Compute the normal vector normal vector
- Return a new vec3
- Modified mod256
raytrace Key Features
raytrace Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on raytrace
QUESTION
I'm rendering multiple layers of flat triangles with a raytracer in the fragment shader. The upper layers have holes, and I'm looking for a way how I can avoid running the shader for pixels that are filled already by one of the upper layers, i.e. I want only the parts of the lower layers rendered that lie in the holes in the upper layers. Of course, if there's a hole or not is not known unless the fragment shader did his thing for a layer.
As far as I understand, I cannot use early depth testing because there, the depth values are interpolated between the vertices and do not come from the fragment shader. Is there a way to "emulate" that behavior?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-18 at 16:42The best way to solve this issue is to not use layers. You are only using layers because of the limitations of using a 3D texture to store your scene data. So... don't do that.
SSBOs and buffer textures (if your hardware is too old for SSBOs) can access more memory than a 3D texture. And you could even employ manual swizzling of the data to improve cache locality if that is viable.
As far as I understand, I cannot use early depth testing because there, the depth values are interpolated between the vertices and do not come from the fragment shader.
This is correct insofar as you cannot use early depth tests, but it is incorrect as to why.
The "depth" provided by the VS doesn't need to be the depth of the actual fragment. You are rendering your scene in layers, presumably with each layer being a full-screen quad. By definition, everything in one layer of rendering is beneath everything in a lower layer. So the absolute depth value doesn't matter; what matters is whether there is something from a higher layer over this fragment.
So each layer could get its own depth value, with lower layers getting a lower depth value. The exact value is arbitrary and irrelevant; what matters is that higher layers have higher values.
The reason this doesn't work is this: if your raytracing algorithm detects a miss within a layer (a "hole"), you must discard
that fragment. And the use of discard
at all turns off early depth testing in most hardware, since the depth testing logic is usually tied to the depth writing logic (it is an atomic read/conditional-modify/conditional-write).
QUESTION
I am writing a raytracer using Java, but I ran into an issue with intersections between rays and triangles. I am using the algorithm given at Scratchapixel, but it is not working properly.
I am testing it using the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-12 at 02:11The issue was quite simple, I had my cross product implementation wrong, and after that I had to change one line of code.
I changed
QUESTION
I have a raytracer that I need to use in combination with traditional triangle projection techniques, I need to make the raytraced image be able to occlude projected triangles. The easiest way would be to write depth values directly to a depth buffer.
Apparently imageStore can only work with color images. Is there a mechanism I can use? The only alternative is to store depth in a color image and then make a dummy shader that sets the depth in a fragment shader.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-25 at 15:22https://vulkan.gpuinfo.org/listoptimaltilingformats.php
It would appear that most implementations don't allow using depth images as storage images. I suggest creating an extra image and copying/blitting it to the depth image.
QUESTION
I am trying to write a compute shader that raytraces an image, pixels on the right of the yz plane sample from image A, those on the left from image B.
I don't want to have to sample both images so I am trying to use non uniform access by doing:
texture(textures[nonuniformEXT(sampler_id)], vec2(0.5));
and enabling the relevant extension in the shader. This triggers the following validaiton layer error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-24 at 15:35You have to enable the feature at device creation.
You can check for support of the feature by calling vkGetPhysicalDeviceFeatures2 and following the pNext
chain through to a VkPhysicalDeviceVulkan12Features, and checking that shaderSampledImageArrayNonUniformIndexing
member is to VK_TRUE
.
After that when creating the device with vkCreateDevice, inside the pCreateInfo
structure, in the pNext
chain you have to have a VkPhysicalDeviceVulkan12Features with shaderSampledImageArrayNonUniformIndexing
set to VK_TRUE
.
QUESTION
Hello I build a raytracer in java and everything works fine but if i set 3 spheres on the same z axis the reflection doesnt work and if I change the z axis from the spheres it will work fine. In the following you can see the picture. There you can see the one sphere does the reflection correctly if it is not on the same z axis.
[Raytracer] [1]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/MSeCp.png
In the following is my code for calculate the Intersection.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-28 at 15:06the problem was the v[]:
QUESTION
I was working on my ray tracer written in C++ following this series of books: Ray Tracing in One Weekend. I started working a little bit on my own trying to implement features that weren't described in the book, like a BVH tree builder using SAH, transforms, triangles and meshes.
NOTE: The BVH implementation is based on two main resources which are this article: Bounding Volume Hierarchies and C-Ray (A ray tracer written in C).
After I implemented all of that I noticed that there was some weirdness while trying to use some materials on meshes. For example, as the title says, the metal material looks completely black:
In the first image you can see how the metal material should look like and in the second one you can see how it looks like on meshes.
I spent a lot of time trying to figure out what the issue was but I couldn't find it and I couldn't find a way of tracking it.
If you want to take a look at the code for more clarity the ray tracer is on GitHub at https://github.com/ITHackerstein/RayTracer.
The branch on which I'm implementing meshes is meshes
.
To replicate my build environment I suggest you follow this build instructions:
$ git clone https://github.com/ITHackerstein/RayTracer
$ cd RayTracer
$ git checkout meshes
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ cmake ..
$ make
$ mkdir tests
At this point you're almost ready to go except you need the TOML scene file an the OBJ file I'm using which are these two:
- boh.toml (Scene file)
- teapot.obj (Teapot OBJ file)
Download them and place them in the build/tests
and after that make sure you are in the build
folder and run it using the following command:
$ ./RayTracer tests/boh.toml
After it finishes running you should have a tests/boh.ppm
file which is the resulting image file stored using PPM format. If you don't have a software that let's you open it there are multiple viewers online.
NOTE: My platform is Linux, I didn't test it on Windows or Mac OS.
EDIT
Does the mesh work with other materials?
So as you can in the first image and especially in the second one we have we have some darker rectangular spots, and also the lighting seems kinda messed up. In the third image you have an idea of how it works on a normal primitive.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-28 at 10:42I finally figured it out thanks to the tips that @Wyck gave me.
The problem was in the normals, I noticed that the Metal::scatter
method received a normal that was almost zero. So that's why it was returning black.
After some logging, I found out that the Instance::intersects_ray
method was not normalizing the transformed normal vector, and that's what caused the issue. So, in the end, the solution was simpler than I thought it would be.
QUESTION
Copying a VkImage
that is being used to render to an offscreen framebuffer gives a black image.
When using a rasterizer the rendered image is non-empty but as soon as I switch to ray tracing the output image is empty:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 09:08Resolved by now:
When submitting the command buffer to the queue it would require an additional vkQueueWaitIdle(m_queue)
since ray tracing finishes with a certain latency
QUESTION
I have a simple fasm program, in this program I get some zeroed memory from windows through VirtualAlloc. I then have a procedure where I simply set up the parameters and make a call to StretchDIBits passing a pointer to the empty memory buffer. I therefore expect the screen should be drawn black. This however is not the case, and I can't for the life of me figure out why.
Below is the code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 06:32I'm sorry I don't know much about fasm, I tried to reproduce the problem through C++:
QUESTION
As far as I know, all the techniques mentioned in the title are rendering algorithms that seem quite similar. All ray based techniques seem to revolve about casting rays through each pixel of an image which are supposed to represent rays of real light. This allows to render very realistic images.
As a matter of fact I am making a simple program that renders such images myself based on Raytracing in one Weekend.
Now the thing is that I wanted to somehow name this program. I used the term “ray tracer” as this is the one used in the book.
I have heard a lot of different terms however and I would be interested to know what exactly is the difference between ray tracing, ray matching, ray casting, path tracing and potentially any other common ray-related algorithms. I was able to find some comparisons of these techniques online, but they all compared only two of these and some definitions overlapped, so I wanted to ask this question about all four techniques.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-02 at 08:31My understanding of this is:
ray cast
is using raster image to hold the scene and usually stop on first hit (no reflections and ray splitting) and does not necessarily cast ray on per pixel basis (usually per row or column of screen). The 3D version of this is called Voxel space ray cast however the map is not voxel space instead 2 raster images
RGB,Height
are used.For more info see:
(back) ray trace
This usually follows physical properties of light so ray split in reflected and refracted and we stop usually after some number of hits. The scene is represented either with BR meshes or with Analytical equations or both.
for more info see:
the
back
means we cast the rays from camera to scene (on per pixel basis) instead of from light source to everywhere ... to speed up the process a lot at the cost of wrong lighting (but that can be remedied with additional methods on top of this)...
The other therms I am not so sure as I do not use those techniques (at least knowingly):
path tracing
is optimization technique to avoid recursive ray split in ray trace using Monte Carlo (stochastic) approach. So it really does not split the ray but chose randomly between the 2 options (similarly how photons behave in real world) and more rendered frames are then blended together.
ray marching
is optimization technique to speed up ray trace by using SDF (signed distance function) to determine safe advance along the ray so it does not hit anything. But it is confined only to analytical scene.
QUESTION
I am a new user of python and github.
I want to use, with anaconda-jupyter on windows 10, a new repository (module) published on github ( https://github.com/jamesbowman/raytrace ).
I downloaded the zip folder and extracted it in my download folder (F:\Téléchargement\raytrace-master). , but I don’t know how to use this module with jupyter .
How can I import this module into jupyter .
I tried some method but without success
Why it is not possible to copy and paste directly a folder from my download folder (F:/téléchargement/) to a jupyter notebook folder (…/source/repos/ for example ) ?
Thanks!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-22 at 23:00Try using the http copy url from the Github site and use that with
!git clone
in a jupyter notebook cell
then you can do !ls
to check that the repository downloaded. The exclamation points mean that you can do command line commands from your notebook!
Alternatively, you could try unzipping and moving the repo to the same directory where you are running jupyter and search for it with an !ls
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install raytrace
You can use raytrace like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page