tape | reverse proxy capable Web server for local JavaScript
kandi X-RAY | tape Summary
kandi X-RAY | tape Summary
A simple, reverse proxy capable Web server for local JavaScript application development.
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of tape
tape Key Features
tape Examples and Code Snippets
def grad_pass_through(f):
"""Creates a grad-pass-through op with the forward behavior provided in f.
Use this function to wrap any op, maintaining its behavior in the forward
pass, but replacing the original op in the backward graph with an id
def __call__(self, device, token, args):
"""Calls `self._func` in eager mode, recording the tape if needed."""
use_tape_cache = (
self._support_graph_mode_gradient or tape_lib.could_possibly_record())
if use_tape_cache:
wit
def __init__(self, persistent=False):
self._c_tape = _tape.Tape(persistent)
ctx = context_stack.get_default()
self._tape_context = _tape.TapeContext(
ctx, self._c_tape, gradient_registry.get_global_registry())
self._ctx_manage
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on tape
QUESTION
I am trying to use my own train step in with Keras by creating a class that inherits from Model. It seems that the training works correctly but the evaluate function always returns 0 on the loss even if I send to it the train data, which have a big loss value during the training. I can't share my code but was able to reproduce using the example form the Keras api in https://keras.io/guides/customizing_what_happens_in_fit/ I changed the Dense layer to have 2 units instead of one, and made its activation to sigmoid.
The code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 17:27As you manually use the loss and metrics function in the train_step
(not in the .compile
) for the training set, you should also do the same for the validation set or by defining the test_step
in the custom model in order to get the loss score and metrics score. Add the following function to your custom model.
QUESTION
According to Wikipedia, the ASCII is a 7-bit encoding. Since each address (then and now) stores 8 bits, the extraneous 8th bit can bit used as a parity bit.
The committee voted to use a seven-bit code to minimize costs associated with data transmission. Since perforated tape at the time could record eight bits in one position, it also allowed for a parity bit for error checking if desired.[3]:217, 236 §5 Eight-bit machines (with octets as the native data type) that did not use parity checking typically set the eighth bit to 0.
Nothing seems to mandate that the 8th bit in a byte storing an ASCII character has to be 0. Therefore, when decoding ASCII characters, do we have to account for the possibility that the 8th bit may be set to 1? Python doesn't seem to take this into account — should it? Or are we guaranteed that the parity bit is always 0 (by some official standard)?
ExampleIf the parity bit is 0 (default), then Python can decode a character ('@'):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 11:39The fact that the parity bit CAN be set is just an observation, not a generally followed protocol. That being said, I know of no programming languages that actually care about parity when decoding ASCII. If the highest bit is set, the number is simply treated as >=128
, which is out of range of the known ASCII characters.
QUESTION
I need to compute tf.Variable
gradients in a class method, but use those gradients to update the variables at a later time, in a different method. I can do this when not using the @tf.function
decorator, but I get the TypeError: An op outside of the function building code is being passed a "Graph" tensor
error when using @tf.function
. I've searched for understanding on this error and how to resolve it, but have come up short.
Just FYI if you're curious, I want to do this because I have variables that are in numerous different equations. Rather than trying to create a single equation that relates all the variables, it is easier (less computationally costly) to keep them separate, compute the gradients at a moment in time for each of those equations, and then incrementally apply the updates. I recognize that these two approaches are not mathematically identical.
Here is my code (a minimal example), followed by the results and error message. Note that when gradients are computed and used to update variables in a single method, .iterate()
, there is no error.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 18:28Please check the quick fix below corresponding to your question.
QUESTION
I'm trying to build an LSTM encoder. I'm testing it on the MNIST dataset to check any errors before using it on my actual dataset. My code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 19:28You need to pass x_train and y_train into the fit statement.
QUESTION
I'm working on this image classification problem with keras. I'm trying to use subclassing API's
to do almost everything. I've created my custom
conv blocks which looks as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 16:40In your custom model with subclassed API, implement the call
method as follows:
QUESTION
I've been trying to translate some PyTorch code to TensorFlow 2, but the TF2 code is around 10 times slower. I've tried looking at where this might come from, and as far as I can tell it comes from the tape.gradient
call (performance was the same with keras' .fit function). I've tried to use different data loaders, ways of declaring the model, installations, etc... and the results have been consistent.
Any explanation / solution as to why this is happening would be much appreciated.
Here is a minimalist version of the TF2 code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 11:34You're using tf.GradientTape
correctly, but both your models and data are different in the snippets you provided.
Here is the TF code that uses the same data and model architecture as your Pytorch model.
QUESTION
Background
I'm currently trying to implement a DDPG framework to control a simple car agent. At first, the car agent would only need to learn how to reach the end of a straight path as quickly as possible by adjusting its acceleration. This task was simple enough, so I decided to introduce an additional steering action as well. I updated my observation and action spaces accordingly.
The lines below are the for loop that runs each episode:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-05 at 19:06The issue has been resolved thanks to some simple but helpful advice I received on Reddit. I was disrupting the tracking of my variables by making changes using my custom for-loop. I should have used a TensorFlow function instead. The following changes fixed the problem for me:
QUESTION
I use tensorflow's Dataset such that y
is a dictionary of 6 tensors which I all use in a single loss function which looks likes this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 10:45Here is one approach for your case. We will still use a custom training loop but also take the leverage of the convenient .fit
method by customizing this method. Please check the document for more details of this: Customizing what happens in fit()
Here is one simple demonstration, extending your reproducible code.
QUESTION
I am building a DNN with a custom loss function and I am training this DNN using Gradient Tape in TensorFlow.kerasenter code here
. The code runs without any errors, however, as far as I can check the weights of the DNN, the weights were not being updated at all. I followed exactly what recommends from the TensorFlow website and search for the answers but still don't understand what is the reason. Here is my code:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 11:05The weight does change. You can check as follows; after building the model save your weights file (these are initial weight).
QUESTION
Please find the below TF Keras Model
in which I am using tanh activation function
in the Hidden Layers
.
While the value of Logits are proper, the values that are calculated by implementing the tanh function
manually is resulting in Nan
.
It may be because of the Runtime
Warnings shown below:
/home/abc/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ipykernel_launcher.py:76: RuntimeWarning: overflow encountered in exp
/home/abc/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ipykernel_launcher.py:76: RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in true_divide
Complete reproducible code is mentioned below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 09:48Normalizing resolves the issue of overflowing:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install tape
No Installation instructions are available at this moment for tape.Refer to component home page for details.
Support
If you have any questions vist the community on GitHub, Stack Overflow.
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page