health-check | Health Check is an application that provides an API | Monitoring library

I am trying to deploy Google's nginx hello world example via App Engine's flexible env. I'm using the same setup as detailed in the quick start guide, with the exception of network settings added to app.yaml (file contents below):

I have below command for creating api health check in oracle cloud.

When I run my mocha tests in debug mode, Node.js debugger has a default value used as the --inspect-brk= value. Without specifying it in the script, my test script looks like that

Lately I have been struggling with one problem : I can't ignore io.grpc.ServerInterceptor for some endpoints, in my case the health-check one, provided under the hood by io.grpc.protobuf.services.HealthServiceImpl

The only option that I could find is to define a new ServerInterceptor that retrieves the endpoint name through an io.grpc.Listener#onMessage and close the gRPC call before doing any of my other ServerInteceptor if the endpoint matches.

However, this solution does not seem very elegant. Is there a way, maybe from configuration, to ignore my existing interceptors ?

This issue is new, when I started using gRPC version 1.42.2. Everything was working well under gRPC 1.35.0.

Thank you for your help.

EDIT : some code

In my configuration class :

New to AWS EKS Fargate.

I created a cluster on aws EKS fargate and then proceed to install a helm chart; and the pods are all in pending state, looking at the pod description, I noticed there is some errors as

I am trying to build a CI with GitHub actions for my django app. I defined my environment variables on github in settings -> secrets -> actions.

This is my ci.yaml file :

I would like to print some log messages from the external check script of HAPROXY to rsyslog. For now, I use “echo” in my external-check.sh script but it does not show up the echo messages. It only shows the haproxy log messages. Is that possible?

The content of haproxy.cfg:

I'm using ECS with Fargate and trying to create a bind mount on ephemeral storage but my user (id 1000) is unable to write to the volume.

According to the documentation, it should be possible.

However the documentation mentions:

By default, the volume permissions are set to 0755 and the owner as root. These permissions can be customized in the Dockerfile.

So in my Dockerfile I have

I am trying to deploy a springboot application running on 8080 port. My target is to have https protocol for custom subdomain with google managed-certificates. here are my yamls.

1. deployment.yaml