GitGraph | Displays nice graphs of GitHub usage | Infrastructure Automation library

by caneroj1 Ruby Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | GitGraph Summary

GitGraph is a Ruby library typically used in Devops, Infrastructure Automation, Terraform applications. GitGraph has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Displays nice graphs of GitHub usage through a Rack App. Can help you analyze things like what languages you most frequently push in, etc.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

GitGraph has a low active ecosystem.

It has 7 star(s) with 1 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

GitGraph has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of GitGraph is current.

Quality

GitGraph has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

GitGraph has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

GitGraph code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

GitGraph is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

GitGraph releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

It has 571 lines of code, 29 functions and 17 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of GitGraph

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

GitGraph Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for GitGraph.

GitGraph Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for GitGraph.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on GitGraph

Why local git repo does not see the merge executed on origin?

IntelliJ IDEA. Make Git tab show unversioned files

How does Deno.run "echo hello" cause this file not found error?

Git - Unmerge a deleted branch

QUESTION

Why local git repo does not see the merge executed on origin?

Asked 2022-Apr-03 at 12:55

I created a pull request on branch "feature/90...".
I merged it in GitHub to the master branch (named "main").

The branch is not deleted.
On VS Code I can switch to master and fetch master from origin.
Why I don't see teh merge in VS Code "GitGraph" plugin and neither on SourceTree?

Also fetching/pulling from bot hbranches does not change it, the "merge to master" line is not represented.
To see it I can merge the branch to master also locally and this is the result:
(ignore the extra "clenup" commit on master branch)

Is it possible to have the merge operation executed on the origin also "visible"/"replicated" on the local repository copy?
Why the pull/fetch does not show it?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Apr-03 at 11:25

It's because what you did on GitHub was not a merge. You did a "Squash and merge" instead. (I know that from looking at the screenshot in your other question on this topic.)

GitHub offers three ways to accept a pull request: Merge, Rebase and Merge, and Squash and Merge. The second two, despite the name, are not merges. They do create a new commit on main, which I can actually manage to see in your annoyingly blanked out diagrams; but they do not result in a merge topology (a commit with two parents) which is what you are looking for (and which is what you created on local when you performed a true merge locally).

If you wanted a merge topology you should have asked GitHub to do a true Merge. However, many companies do not allow this; they configure GitHub to do a Squash and Merge instead. That's okay, but then you must not look for merge topology. That topology is exactly what Squash and Merge is designed to avoid.

(Incidentally, you should have deleted your feature branch. A PR branch that is closed by Squash and Merge is useless and should be deleted immediately. Otherwise there is a danger that you might try to add more commits to it and try to Squash and Merge it again, which will result in horrible merge conflicts and other nasty side effects.)

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71725196

QUESTION

IntelliJ IDEA. Make Git tab show unversioned files

Asked 2021-May-07 at 18:27

Is it possible to make IntelliJ Git tab show unversioned files the way VSCode GitGraph plugin does?

Thanks for advice.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-May-07 at 18:27

With Settings (Preferences on macOS) | Version Control | Commit | Use non-modal commit interface enabled unversioned files are shown in the separate Commit tool window.

If you disable this option, unversioned files will appear in Git tool window under the Local Changes tab.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67439967

QUESTION

How does Deno.run "echo hello" cause this file not found error?

Asked 2020-May-26 at 21:16

Trying out Deno's standard library, I ran into a problem with Deno.run - a function to spawn a new subprocess.

This example is provided in the documentation:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-26 at 20:16

Deno is unable to locate a binary file called echo in your path:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62030189

QUESTION

Git - Unmerge a deleted branch

Asked 2020-May-24 at 14:04

Scenario:

Created a Feature Branch From Master(Blue Color Branch)
Made commits to it
Later Merged with the Master and Deleted the Branch
In between, I have created other Feature Branches and made commits to them.

Question: How can I get back the branch I deleted and unmerge so that the master looks clean without the Feature Branch (Blue Color)? I may need to add commits to that Feature Branch in future also.

I have looked at the following resources: Git undo local branch delete Git unmerge a branch

Do I need to do both of the above to get the desired result? Or do I want to create a new branch and revert the commits added in the Feature Branch and merge it?

I am completely confused and please redirect me to the right path. A sample Git Graph for the use-case is given below.

Note: There is no merge in between the Feature Branch (Blue).

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-24 at 06:54

Simply undo all commits on the master branch till you get back to the merge commit (with the deleted branch).

As merging two brances is a commit too, you then can just undo that.

Note: You can also use git rebase (more about that here) to move single commits you made to another branch if necessary

References:

Another useful thread - removing a single commit

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61982274

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install GitGraph

Add this line to your application's Gemfile:.

Support

Fork it ( https://github.com/[my-github-username]/gitGraph/fork )Create your feature branch (git checkout -b my-new-feature)Commit your changes (git commit -am 'Add some feature')Push to the branch (git push origin my-new-feature)Create a new Pull Request

Find more information at: