rspec | Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby | Functional Testing library
kandi X-RAY | rspec Summary
kandi X-RAY | rspec Summary
Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Compares the expected object .
- Match the expected assertion .
- Defines a coverage task
- Compares the expected target .
- Change the expected value for this unit
- Returns a string representation of the object .
- Checks if the given item is present
- Run the block .
- Initialize a new instance
- This method is called when the visitor is finished
rspec Key Features
rspec Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on rspec
QUESTION
Given a Rails engine_one that has a spec support file engine_one/spec/support/system/order_functions.rb
, containing functionality to support the testing of various order system tests such as simulating a logged in user, adding products to an order etc and contains methods such as log_visitor_in that get used extensively when testing order processing etc...
So now in engine_two that extends some ordering functionality from engine_one I wish to add a new system test that first has to log a visitor in. So how can I make use of that support method from from engine_one?
So far I have mounted the engines in the dummy app I have required engine_one in engine_two/lib/engine.rb I have required the support file in the relevant test but it can't be found and obviously I have added engine_one to engine_two.gemspec
engine_two/spec/rails_helper.rb
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-05 at 05:19When you require
a file, ruby searches for it relative to paths in $LOAD_PATH
; spec/ or test/ are not part of it.
app
directory is a special one in rails, any subdirectory automatically becomes part of autoload_paths
. Auto load paths can be seen here ActiveSupport::Dependencies.autoload_paths
.
Any classes/modules defined inside app/*
directories can be used without requiring corresponding files. Rails v7 uses zeitwerk
to automatically load/reload files by relying on the 'file name' to 'constant name' relationship. That's why folders map to namespaces and files map to classes/modules.
To fix your issue put any shared code where it can be grabbed with require
. Type $LOAD_PATH
in the console:
QUESTION
So I have a file not found problem. I have an engine that works in development mode in the engines test/dummy app, the engine allows the editing of sass variables and stores them in a theme table, the variables are used by a sass partial such as _banner.scss containing variables used in the main stylesheet such as $banner_color which is then imported into the main stylesheet which in turn is precompiled using an initializer in the engine.rb file and inclusion in the app/config/engine_name_manifest.js.
The files are all available in development with the local dummy app but not in the eventual host app due to the assets being compiled.
I have a rake task that takes the data, updates the relevant partial e.g. _banner.scss with the data from the theme table but of course the partials are not not available in a host app as the engine has already compiled them. I'm looking for a solution that will allow me to edit the raw, uncompiled stylesheets then recompile them. Obviously my Capistrano deploy script will need to reapply the stylesheet changes every deployment but that is just a rake task call. What approach should I take? Should I find a way to copy the css files to the host app in an engine initializer? Should I use a different approach entirely, I have started looking at propshaft but that is a massive step to replace sass rails and I'm not sure how that would help
The engine
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-02 at 03:44Thanks for clarifying. If I understood correctly here my take on it.
partials are not not available in a host app as the engine has already compiled them
Partials are still there, precompilation just outputs *.{css/js}
files into public/assets/
that are declared in app/assets/config/manifest.js
.
To get to engines files, instead of Rails.root
use:
QUESTION
I upgraded to Rails 7 and Ruby 3.1. While trying to run tests with rspec
I got the error below. How can I fix it?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-25 at 16:15UPD: on January 6th, 2022 Rails 7.0.1 was released:
The focus of this release is bring support to Ruby 3.1
Amongh other Ruby 3.1-related issues it brought a fix for this problem. So upgrade to Rails >= 7.0.1.
Add gem 'net-smtp', require: false
to your Gemfile and run bundle
.
Similarly I assume you may have problems with net-imap
and net-pop
and so have to add them until a new mail
gem version is released.
Related pull requests and issues:
QUESTION
Good morning people.
I'm trying to understand the error below but as I'm new to rails, I didn't quite understand. Does anyone have a light on what it could be?
I searched the internet but didn't find anything specific.
I searched on the internet but didn't identify anything, if anyone has seen it or has the link, you can send me and I'll see.
If you need any more information to help, let me know and I'll edit the post and add it, I don't know if there's anything else I could have already posted.
thank you for your help !!
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-21 at 13:34First of all, the message about DidYouMean
is a deprecation warning not an error, it doesn't break your app. It means that usage of DidYouMean::SPELL_CHECKERS
is deprecated and will be removed in a future version of ruby. In this case in Ruby 3.3. You shouldn't worry about it until you use versions that are lower than 3.3.
It's not your code that triggers the warning. It comes from a gem named Thor. The issue was solved in thor version 1.2.0. You can update the gem by calling bundle update thor
.
The actual error comes from the bootsnap
gem:
QUESTION
By analyzing code using SonarLint, I got a message (the title of the question) about a destructor that is declared like below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-07 at 16:40Yes:
An explicitly-defaulted function that is not defined as deleted may be declared
constexpr
orconsteval
only if it is constexpr-compatible ([special], [class.compare.default]). A function explicitly defaulted on its first declaration is implicitly inline ([dcl.inline]), and is implicitly constexpr ([dcl.constexpr]) if it is constexpr-compatible.
(From Explicitly defaulted functions, emphasis mine.)
Foo is likely constexpr-compatible in C++20, because std::vector
can now be constexpr
.
QUESTION
Gems
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-06 at 11:29First you need to create blob file in case of active storage.
QUESTION
So I'm running the new Apple M1 Pro chipset, and the original M1 chip on another machine, and when I attempt to create new RSpec tests in ruby I get the following error.
Function not implemented - Failed to initialize inotify (Errno::ENOSYS)
the full stack dump looks like this
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-31 at 17:41Update:
To fix this issue I used the solution from @mahatmanich listed here
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31857365/rails-generate-commands-hang-when-trying-to-create-a-model'
Essentially, we need to delete the bin directory and then re-create it using
rake app:update:bin
Since rails 5 some 'rake' commands are encapsulated within the 'rails' command. However when one deletes 'bin/' directory one is also removeing the 'rails' command itself, thus one needs to go back to 'rake' for the reset since 'rails' is not available any longer but 'rake' still is.
QUESTION
If I have a User
model that includes a method dangerous_action
and somewhere I have code that calls the method on a specific subset of users in the database like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-04 at 03:15I realised that I'm really trying to test two aspects of the perform_dangerous_action
method. The first is the scoping of the database fetch, and the second is that it calls the correct method on the User objects that come up.
For testing the scoping of the DB fetch, I should really just make a scope in the User
class:
QUESTION
I am trying to setup a CI pipeline using Github Actions. At bundle exec rubocop
in my workflow it fails. But the command completely passes locally when run on the rails project.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-03 at 00:14It looks like your RuboCop is finding a configuration file that is part of your dependencies. Normally anything in vendor/
is ignored, but it seems your configuration is overriding that. It should be possible to fix it with something like:
QUESTION
I was wondering if there's a way to achieve what I want with RSpec. So I want to test an array of hashes that looks similar to this one:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-16 at 18:26You can use composed matchers:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install rspec
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page