simulacrum | UI Regression Testing in Ruby | Functional Testing library
kandi X-RAY | simulacrum Summary
kandi X-RAY | simulacrum Summary
Simulacrum allows you to write RSpec style specs that when run will compare screenshots of your UI components to their last “Known Good State”, and tell you if they’ve changed. Simulacrum is built around common tools in the Ruby development world, such as RSpec, Capybara & Selenium Webdriver. Feedback and PRs accepted and appreciated — see Development below for how to get up and running.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Test whether the image is valid .
- Define a component
- Calculate the square of the average of the mean of the square .
- Returns the path to the config file
- Resets the window size of the window .
- Render the image
- Takes a thumbnail and returns the image .
- Configures the RSpec specification of the RSpec .
- Returns the absolute path to the current model
- Returns the bounds of the specified element .
simulacrum Key Features
simulacrum Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on simulacrum
QUESTION
I've been trying to figure out if there is a simple way to do this, and if not if there is a pandoc way to do this outside of using cat to combine files.
What I want to do is say I have the following set of files:
- Gramps: How to Install.pandoc
- Gramps: How to Backup Tree.pandoc
- Gramps: How to Enter a person.pandoc
- Gramps: Geneology Basics about entering people.pandoc
- Gramps: How Plaucity of citation is bad
- etc on and on
I would essential like to be able to write a pandoc document that can import the files above into itself and compile them as if they were in the document as well, without having to concatenate them in the shell first or without resorting to HTML links.
Something like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-07 at 20:28The include-files
Lua filter should do what you need. You'll need to download the include-files.lua
file and pass it to pandoc via --lua-filters include-files.lua
.
The syntax is
QUESTION
Scala 2.13
I have tons of similar traits of the form
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-23 at 21:45You can use macro annotation
QUESTION
I'm trying to derive a tuple instance for a type class with dependent type. I'm using shapeless to create summon the type class for the tuple elements. I'm having trouble matching tuple instance types:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-05 at 15:08Try Aux
pattern
QUESTION
I have this typeclass
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-24 at 22:05Compiler can't see that Int => Int
is Int => ?
applied to Int
.
Add
QUESTION
I am trying to write a simple typeclass using Simulacrum. Here is my build.sbt
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-24 at 20:23You didn't add macro-paradise
QUESTION
I wanted to use Simulacrum in Scalafiddle, like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-19 at 07:28There's nothing wrong with your code, the problem is with ScalaFiddle.
If I attempt to run your code in scastie (similar web IDE for Scala), and print out the type trees generated by it, you can see the following:
QUESTION
I have a listview with over 400 components and I am wondering if there is an easier way to create descriptions for each individual element without having to create other classes. The only way I can think to make this process easier is to use webviews but I've looked around and people have already said on here it wouldn't work out very well.
Here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-06 at 18:33There are a couple of potential answers.
I know you don't want to hear it - but in this case another class is really going to be your best friend, because you have a List which can be simply changed from type String to type Spell (which will take your description). But bear in mind, that only requires one Class, not a Class per element, so it's not much work!
Example:
QUESTION
What is the preferred way to call functions which constructs instances implementing certain type classes e.g. deserialize
in the following example:
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Mar-07 at 21:18To me, this is overkill. My preferred way, and what I have seen in other code bases, is just:
QUESTION
I have following applicative definition and implementation:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-05 at 09:31def apply[A, B](fa: List[A])(ff: List[A => B]): List[B] =
(fa zip ff).map { case (a, f) => f(a) }
QUESTION
I am trying to convert a couple of Java enumerations values into another Java enumeration (the usage of Java enum over Scala Enumeration is due to legacy reasons - the enums are actually generated using JAXB).
Instead of a plain old pattern matching and having a map mapping one enumeration type to another, I figured writing a typeclass looks cleaner (also kinda cool). When I use simulacrum to do this, it compiles and runs just great. However, when I try to hand-code the typeclass myself, it throws a compilation error
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jan-30 at 10:13It's because your implicit class and the object it's defined in are both called EmailEnumOps
.
When you change the name of the object it works:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install simulacrum
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page