rdf | Ruby library for working with Resource Description Framework | Data Manipulation library

You can try this

schema.org has a solid arsenal of usable properties to describe quantities, including minValue and maxValue:

While Memgraph is not an RDF store, it is capable of handling this kind of data with the labeled property graph model (LPG). LPG is represented by a set of nodes, relationships, properties (key-value attributes) and labels. RDF statements can be directly treated as nodes, relationships and properties of the graph, which are explored using the Cypher query language. Therefore, both RDF and LPG allow the creation of a knowledge graph.

fixed by cloning the rtcclient repo, and adding my own custom function getUserEmail

As can be seen in the comments of the post, my problem is fixed, so I thought I'd collect a closing answer here to not leave the post pending.

The actual solution: As explained here nicely by @UninformedUser, the issue was that I had conflicting maven package versions in my dependencies. Bringing everything in sync with each other solved the issue.

Incidental solution: As I wrote in the comments above, specifically defining 3.3.0 for the maven-assembly-plugin happened to solve the issue. But this was only chance, as explained here by @Ignazio, just because the order of "assembling" things changed, overwriting the conflicting package.

Huge thanks to both for the help.

In this example the viewBox of the is 100 in width and the image also takes up 100% of the width. So, no matter the actual width of the image it will always fill the entire SVG.

The fits in the size of the viewBox of the that holds the image. I know the width is 100, so I made the clippath 70 in height and width plus the extra height that the rotation takes up. This matches kind of the height of the images (unknown at this point).

I replaced the content of the . It is more "transparent" what the clip path does and easier to manipulate.

I MUST maintain this line where she is.

That directive does not need to go inside the WordPress code block. You should place that directive before the # BEGIN WordPress comment marker. And this will prevent it from being overwritten by WordPress. In fact, you could place your custom rules at the very top of the file to make them easier to find/maintain.

It will work exactly the same.

You do not need to enclose it in an container like the other directives. And you should not repeat the RewriteEngine On and RewriteBase / directives. (The order of these particular directives do not matter. In fact, the last instance "wins" and controls the entire file.)

For example:

MDN Says:

For example, for any MIME type whose main type is text, you can add the optional charset parameter to specify the character set used for the characters in the data. If no charset is specified, the default is ASCII (US-ASCII) unless overridden by the user agent's settings. To specify a UTF-8 text file, the MIME type text/plain;charset=UTF-8 is used.

So, for anything based on text/... you can optionally add the charset.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Basics_of_HTTP/MIME_types#structure_of_a_mime_type

The following update to contentType() function demonstrates one solution.

I think the first thing to be aware of is that equivalence, say D equivalentClass E, is an abbreviation for D subClassOf E and E subClassOf D. The semantics of subClassOf is subset. This means that the set D is a subset of set E and set E is a subset of D, which means set D and set E are exactly the same set. We say they are equivalent.

Note now the semantics of subClassOf. If I know F subClassOf E and G subClassOf E, what can I say about how F and G relates to each other? Absolutely nothing. It is a bit like knowing a bicycle and a truck are both vehicles. That does not make a bicycle a truck or a truck a bicycle, though both are vehicles.

Thus, in your example, A can be expanded to the 2 axioms

A subClassOf (a_to_b some B) and (a_to_c some C)

(a_to_b some B) and (a_to_c some C) subClassOf A

Answers to your questions:

(a) With the assertions for x as you have it, we can see that x is indeed an instance of A. However, there is no information wrt x that makes it possible for us to say x is of type A2. All we know is that both x and A2 are subclasses of (a_to_b some B) and (a_to_c some C).

(b) This is due to the Open World Assumption, which means the reasoner does not make any assumptions based on the absence of information. If you have not stated explicitly that y has no a_to_b relation to B, it will assume that an a_to_b relation exists but is merely not known. This is as opposed to the closed world assumption made by databases usually. I.e., if no employer information exists for a client the assumption is often made that the client is not employed.

You can state that y has no a_to_b relation by stating that a_to_b max 0 B. The reasoner will then give an inconsistency.

(c1) yes, but these may not be known currently due to the open world assumption.

(c2) yes, based on the semantics of equivalence

(c3) yes.

This is not true for A2 because it is merely a subclass rather than all things that have a relation a_to_b with an instance of B and have a relation a_to_C with an instance of C.

When to use equivalent vs subClassOf

Equivalence is used for definitions. That is when you want to state the necessary and sufficient conditions for something to be called an A (from your example).

SubClassOf is used when you want to define a hierarchy from most general to most specific. I.e., it is typically what you see in taxonomies and in programming you will see it as object oriented class hierarchies.