linkeddata | rb including all parsing/serialization plugins | JSON Processing library
kandi X-RAY | linkeddata Summary
kandi X-RAY | linkeddata Summary
A metadistribution of RDF.rb including all parsing/serialization plugins.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of linkeddata
linkeddata Key Features
linkeddata Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on linkeddata
QUESTION
In Lookup with a pipeline, I would like to get the linked records from an array in the parent document.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-28 at 20:28You just need regular $lookup, the documentation states that:
If your localField is an array, you may want to add an $unwind stage to your pipeline. Otherwise, the equality condition between the localField and foreignField is foreignField: { $in: [ localField.elem1, localField.elem2, ... ] }.
So for below aggregation:
QUESTION
What is the preferred method to save a file, be it turtle
or an image or a video etc. on a solid POD?
The documentation at https://linkeddata.github.io/rdflib.js/doc/Fetcher.html is, as stated in the readme, of limited usefulness in its current state.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-27 at 12:03You can use solid-file-client for that
QUESTION
- schema.org is better for SEO
- From https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/ it seems FOAF has more adoption?
I have used the ontology:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-19 at 10:37You can use multiple vocabularies/ontologies to describe the same entity.
If a consumer (like a search engine) only recognizes terms from a specific vocabulary (like Schema.org), it will simply ignore the terms from the other vocabularies (like FOAF).
So, for an entity that represents a person, you could use the types schema:Person
, foaf:Person
and/or dcterms:Agent
. And for a book this person wrote, you could use the properties schema:creator
, foaf:maker
, and/or dcterms:creator
.
If your primary motivation is SEO (instead of Linked Data), I would recommend to use the vocabulary Schema.org as far as possible, and other vocabularies in addition (at least where Schema.org is lacking, or, if you prefer, wherever it’s possible).
QUESTION
I am working on an ontology for video games for an university course project, specifically focused on the relations between different genres. I have included this ontology in my project and expanded on it. The current state of the OWL document is here.
When I start the HermiT reasoner in Protégé, it states that Game
is Equivalent To Genre
with the explanations:
Furthermore, it states that owl:Thing
is Equivalent To Game
and equivalent to Genre
with the following explanations (respectively):
As you may suppose, this is definitely not a result that I expected. I have tried setting Game Disjoint With Genre
, but the reasoner then states that the ontology is inconsistent. The explanation it gives is the same as the explanation for Game Equivalent To Genre
but with the added Disjoint With
restriction in each explanation.
This is my first time working with something like this, so I would be grateful if someone can explain to me the fallacy in my logic. What causes this behavior, why, and how can I fix it?
In addition, here is the code of the two object properties that seem to cause the trouble (the rest can be found here):
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-12 at 11:50Just to give you a hint for the entailment owl:Thing EquivalentTo Game
:
We have
Reflexive: isSimilarTo
which is equivalent to
owl:Thing SubClassOf isSimilarTo some Self
which in fact means each individual in your ontology is related to itself via the property isSimilarTo
, i.e. for each individual x
in your ontology we can entail
isSimilarTo(x, x)
In addition, we have
isSimilarTo Range Game
which is semantically equivalent to the axiom
owl:Thing SubClassOf isSimilarTo only Game
This means, if there is such a relation isSimilarTo(x, y)
, the object y
will belong to class Game
.
Now, remember that we already said that every individual in the ontology has such a relation, just to itself. Thus, we can infer that each individual belongs to class Game
.
QUESTION
Is it possibe to filter out results that contains a non-resolvable URI within the SPARQL query?
An example: I'm making the following query (endpoint: http://linkeddata.systems:8890/sparql):
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jan-05 at 17:02How do you know that it's not resolvable? RDF doesn't have a concept of a "relative URI", all the URIs are resolved relative to something (and perhaps to what is an implementation detail in some cases), so you end up with absolute URIs. In the HTML results from that endpoint, I get http://linkeddata.systems:8890/hostncbitaxid/
, and that could easily be resolvable.
That said, if you are ending up with results that include non-absolute URIs, and you want to filter those out, you could use some heuristics to do that. For instance, if you only want URIs beginning with http, you can do that. E.g., here's a query that returns two values for ?uri:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install linkeddata
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page