linkeddata | rb including all parsing/serialization plugins | JSON Processing library

 by   ruby-rdf Ruby Version: 3.2.1 License: Unlicense

kandi X-RAY | linkeddata Summary

kandi X-RAY | linkeddata Summary

linkeddata is a Ruby library typically used in Utilities, JSON Processing applications. linkeddata has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

A metadistribution of RDF.rb including all parsing/serialization plugins.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              linkeddata has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 50 star(s) with 8 fork(s). There are 16 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 1 open issues and 9 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 152 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of linkeddata is 3.2.1

            kandi-Quality Quality

              linkeddata has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              linkeddata has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              linkeddata code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              linkeddata is licensed under the Unlicense License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              linkeddata releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.
              linkeddata saves you 17 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 48 lines of code, 0 functions and 3 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of linkeddata
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            linkeddata Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for linkeddata.

            linkeddata Examples and Code Snippets

            Linked Data for Ruby,Examples
            Rubydot img1Lines of Code : 1dot img1License : Permissive (Unlicense)
            copy iconCopy
            require 'linkeddata'
              
            Linked Data for Ruby,Installation
            Rubydot img2Lines of Code : 1dot img2License : Permissive (Unlicense)
            copy iconCopy
            % [sudo] gem install linkeddata
              

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            How to make lookup between two collections when an item in an array exists in the other collection?
            Asked 2019-May-23 at 11:18

            In Lookup with a pipeline, I would like to get the linked records from an array in the parent document.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Jul-28 at 20:28

            You just need regular $lookup, the documentation states that:

            If your localField is an array, you may want to add an $unwind stage to your pipeline. Otherwise, the equality condition between the localField and foreignField is foreignField: { $in: [ localField.elem1, localField.elem2, ... ] }.

            So for below aggregation:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51574668

            QUESTION

            Save file on a solid POD
            Asked 2019-Feb-27 at 12:03

            What is the preferred method to save a file, be it turtle or an image or a video etc. on a solid POD?

            The documentation at https://linkeddata.github.io/rdflib.js/doc/Fetcher.html is, as stated in the readme, of limited usefulness in its current state.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Feb-27 at 12:03

            QUESTION

            Are foaf:Person and schema.org/Person compatible with each other? or better stick with one of them?
            Asked 2019-Feb-19 at 10:37
            1. schema.org is better for SEO
            2. From https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/ it seems FOAF has more adoption?

            I have used the ontology:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Feb-19 at 10:37

            You can use multiple vocabularies/ontologies to describe the same entity.

            If a consumer (like a search engine) only recognizes terms from a specific vocabulary (like Schema.org), it will simply ignore the terms from the other vocabularies (like FOAF).

            So, for an entity that represents a person, you could use the types schema:Person, foaf:Person and/or dcterms:Agent. And for a book this person wrote, you could use the properties schema:creator, foaf:maker, and/or dcterms:creator.

            If your primary motivation is SEO (instead of Linked Data), I would recommend to use the vocabulary Schema.org as far as possible, and other vocabularies in addition (at least where Schema.org is lacking, or, if you prefer, wherever it’s possible).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54759338

            QUESTION

            Reasoner sets two different classes equivalent to each other and owl:Thing
            Asked 2018-Feb-12 at 11:50

            I am working on an ontology for video games for an university course project, specifically focused on the relations between different genres. I have included this ontology in my project and expanded on it. The current state of the OWL document is here.

            When I start the HermiT reasoner in Protégé, it states that Game is Equivalent To Genre with the explanations:

            Furthermore, it states that owl:Thing is Equivalent To Game and equivalent to Genre with the following explanations (respectively):

            As you may suppose, this is definitely not a result that I expected. I have tried setting Game Disjoint With Genre, but the reasoner then states that the ontology is inconsistent. The explanation it gives is the same as the explanation for Game Equivalent To Genre but with the added Disjoint With restriction in each explanation.

            This is my first time working with something like this, so I would be grateful if someone can explain to me the fallacy in my logic. What causes this behavior, why, and how can I fix it?

            In addition, here is the code of the two object properties that seem to cause the trouble (the rest can be found here):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Feb-12 at 11:50

            Just to give you a hint for the entailment owl:Thing EquivalentTo Game:

            We have

            Reflexive: isSimilarTo

            which is equivalent to

            owl:Thing SubClassOf isSimilarTo some Self

            which in fact means each individual in your ontology is related to itself via the property isSimilarTo, i.e. for each individual x in your ontology we can entail

            isSimilarTo(x, x)

            In addition, we have

            isSimilarTo Range Game

            which is semantically equivalent to the axiom

            owl:Thing SubClassOf isSimilarTo only Game

            This means, if there is such a relation isSimilarTo(x, y), the object y will belong to class Game.

            Now, remember that we already said that every individual in the ontology has such a relation, just to itself. Thus, we can infer that each individual belongs to class Game.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48737337

            QUESTION

            How to filter non-resolvable URIs on a SPARQL query?
            Asked 2017-Jan-05 at 21:56

            Is it possibe to filter out results that contains a non-resolvable URI within the SPARQL query?

            An example: I'm making the following query (endpoint: http://linkeddata.systems:8890/sparql):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Jan-05 at 17:02

            How do you know that it's not resolvable? RDF doesn't have a concept of a "relative URI", all the URIs are resolved relative to something (and perhaps to what is an implementation detail in some cases), so you end up with absolute URIs. In the HTML results from that endpoint, I get http://linkeddata.systems:8890/hostncbitaxid/, and that could easily be resolvable.

            That said, if you are ending up with results that include non-absolute URIs, and you want to filter those out, you could use some heuristics to do that. For instance, if you only want URIs beginning with http, you can do that. E.g., here's a query that returns two values for ?uri:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41489213

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install linkeddata

            The recommended installation method is via RubyGems. To install the latest official release of the gem, do:.

            Support

            http://ruby-rdf.github.io/
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular JSON Processing Libraries

            json

            by nlohmann

            fastjson

            by alibaba

            jq

            by stedolan

            gson

            by google

            normalizr

            by paularmstrong

            Try Top Libraries by ruby-rdf

            rdf

            by ruby-rdfRuby

            json-ld

            by ruby-rdfHTML

            sparql-client

            by ruby-rdfRuby

            sparql

            by ruby-rdfRuby

            spira

            by ruby-rdfRuby