attest | inline unit testing/spec framework | Unit Testing library
kandi X-RAY | attest Summary
kandi X-RAY | attest Summary
An inline unit testing/spec framework that doesn’t force you to follow arbitrary rules
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Parse command line options
- Define a command .
- Iterates over the arguments from the arguments .
- Resolve the option specified by options .
- Parse a calendar date
- Parses the input file option and returns the IO object
- Prints a new command .
- Collects arguments from the parameter list of parameters .
- Define a callable
- Wrap a string around each line of + string + .
attest Key Features
attest Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on attest
QUESTION
The maven build of our project fails with this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 14:52Those Yubico guys uses version ranges:
QUESTION
I am trying to implement SafetyNet in my app. I also, don't have a server, and I am using Firebase Firestore and Firebase Functions.
My knowledge about Firebase Functions is very limited. And I was wondering if I could somehow use the functions to help me with the SafetyNet attestation. As I see, I should be producing a nonce on the cloud, send this nonce to the app, use it to attest, and send it back to the cloud to verify the integrity correct?
But I can't seem to find anywhere on how to do this. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-05 at 14:29YES
Sorry for the excitement there, but this is possible since a few weeks ago through a new feature called Firebase App Check.
With App Check, you always end up with a two-step process:
- Use an attestation provider (such as SafetyNet) in your application, so that information about the app is attached to each request it makes to Firebase.
- Then at some point in time, when enough of your app requests have this information attached, check for the app information in Cloud Functions, or enable the check in one of the other supported services.
If you check the documentation on enabling App Check enforcement for Cloud Functions, you'll see that it mostly boils down to this check in the code:
QUESTION
I'm working on a capacitor app that uses capacitor-firebase-auth for phone auth using firebase. The app now has thousands of users and for the vast majority everything works fine. However, a few users per day are not able to login with phone number, and most of them are using a custom ROM like lineageos.
In order to debug the problem, I installed lineageos on one of my devices. Logcat of login with phone number looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 06:14ok, I found the solution: for some reason, google-services.json did not include my play store signing SHA1 key, despite it being present in firebase admin console. Solution: I removed the SHA1 key and added it again... Afterwards, google-services.json included my release SHA1 and phone auth works even on lineageos.
Apparently SHA256 is required for phone verification using safetynet which works on standard androids, and SHA1 is only required for the recaptcha flow which is required on non-standard androids. This explains why it worked for the vast majority of users.
QUESTION
I am using \multicolumn{2}{p{2cm}|}
to allow for wrap text. The header in the single cell above the two split cells is wrapping to the confinements of the first split cell.
This is my whole code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 22:27You need to do:
QUESTION
With the help of another thread I was able to construct the following matrix, with 100 diagonal matrices inside each of equal dimension 100 by 100:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 20:04I think you should use rep(list(...),100)
, rather than list(rep(...,100))
, i.e.,
QUESTION
I have implemented some sort of password-less authentication using DUO lab's webauthn
using Django. However, I keep getting this error:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-20 at 16:36The current version of the webauthn
library only supports the following attestation formats:
"fido-u2f"
"packed"
"none"
You mentioned you're trying to register an Android device - without seeing a response you're getting back from the call to navigator.credentials.create()
I'd make an educated guess that you're getting responses with "android-safetynet"
or "android-key"
attestation statements which the library is unable to verify.
QUESTION
The documentation specifies this code to activate a factor:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-17 at 14:56I figured out. In this part
QUESTION
We currently use the legacy header method of authenticating with the DocuSign REST API for embedded signing ceremonies, and are looking to migrate our method of authentication to one that is fully supported by DocuSign. The signer, however, should not need to authenticate with DocuSign to sign this document. It is not a legally binding contract, but a document in which we collect information in order to perform a background check of the signer. The signature is simply for attesting that the information they have provided is accurate, and a paper or eSignature is required for this in the state of Illinois. What are our options?
EDIT: Based on similar questions I've seen here and in other forums, it seems that the documentation for this could be better. The part I was hung up on was obtaining consent for the JWT Grant authentication process. The impression is that the end user (either the signer or the sender), via the client application or service, would need to grant their consent via authenticating with DocuSign each time something needed to be signed or sent for signature. If you are using an integration such as ours, attempting to keep DocuSign as invisible as possible, this would not be an option. This is not the case. The URL constructed in Step 1 of this process is actually meant to be constructed manually, by the developer, as part of the development process, and navigated to in a browser, where the developer will log in with the DocuSign account that is meant to be used for the integration.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-10 at 16:50You can use JSON Web Tokens Authentication (JWT) and with JWT you only need a single system user that would be use to make API calls.
End-users won't need to log-into your application.
On other notes, since you wrote "The signature is simply for attesting that the information they have provided is accurate," I would suggest you look into using DocuSign Click. A clickwrap is exactly what you need for this and you won't even need to make API calls from the server once you set it up.
QUESTION
I've been trying to understand how to (in jQuery) traverse the DOM using $(this) as a starting point inside a setInterval/setTimeOut function and have come across some behavior I have found baffling.
It doesn't seem to be possible to traverse the DOM using $(this) as a starting point inside a setInterval/setTimeOut function
Why is that?
jQuery/javaScript people - get on that.
Sample code to illustrate the behaviour:
jQuery:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-08 at 07:25This is a basic this
scoping problem and has little to do with jQuery.
The most straightforward approach is to assign this
to another variable outside of the callback:
QUESTION
if (navigator.credentials && window.PublicKeyCredential) {
const available = await window.PublicKeyCredential.isUserVerifyingPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable();
if (available) {
const newCredentialInfo = await navigator.credentials.create(options);
var response = newCredentialInfo.response;
var clientExtensionsResults = newCredentialInfo.getClientExtensionResults();
alert(JSON.stringify(response))
alert(JSON.stringify(clientExtensionsResults));
}
else {
alert("Unsupported");
}
}
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-25 at 01:30I see you're calling navigator.credentials.create()
in your component's
componentDidMount()
. macOS and iOS Safari both require that WebAuthn API calls that want to use Touch ID must be made as a result of a "user gesture":
The amount of unsolicited prompts has been surprisingly low. The situation is different with the release of Face ID and Touch ID for the web. So, Face ID and Touch ID for the web require user gestures to function. (User gestures are not required for security keys for backward compatibility.)
See Apple's introduction of their support for WebAuthn for more guidance: https://webkit.org/blog/11312/meet-face-id-and-touch-id-for-the-web/
If you update your React code to move the logic that calls navigator.credentials.create()
into, say, a button click handler, you'll be able to use Face ID. It'll require you click a button to trigger WebAuthn instead of just loading the page, but that's the reality of working with WebAuthn on an Apple OS.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install attest
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page